Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

***VIDEO***Procharged C6 Corvette vs 2013 GT500 vs Supra vs Evo 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 09:09 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Camper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its a kenne bell ... why does that suprise you. Slap your friend for buying a KB
Old 08-26-2013, 09:15 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just dont understand regardless of blower, why it would make so much power and not run even a semi respectable number. We even made 3 more hot lapped pulls on the dyno... only lost 12whp from its coldest run to its hottest run. So you cant blame heat soak. Its not like his pass was inefficient either. He went 11.4 while trapping 124... thats pretty efficient for a stick car.
Old 08-26-2013, 09:45 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
I just dont understand regardless of blower, why it would make so much power and not run even a semi respectable number. We even made 3 more hot lapped pulls on the dyno... only lost 12whp from its coldest run to its hottest run. So you cant blame heat soak. Its not like his pass was inefficient either. He went 11.4 while trapping 124... thats pretty efficient for a stick car.
What was his 1/8th mph vs 1/4? 650rwhp should net him 130mph traps, or high 120's minimum. My 1/8th trap with pulley/tune @ 558rwhp was 99mph. Safe to say the car would have hit low-mid 120's on the big end.
Old 08-26-2013, 01:52 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Couldnt tell ya... but it just doesnt run hard. Its all stock except off road x pipe and kenne bell and suspension. Regardless still made 650whp
Old 08-26-2013, 02:11 PM
  #25  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
LS1rob00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Silly GT500, tricks are for kids
Old 08-27-2013, 08:18 PM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Silver408z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have run the evo and the c6. I lost to the evo and beat the c6. Pretty sure the evo was taking it easy on the gt500. The c6 also needs a clutch bad
Old 09-07-2013, 09:26 PM
  #27  
Staging Lane
 
408-99-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
What was his 1/8th mph vs 1/4? 650rwhp should net him 130mph traps, or high 120's minimum. My 1/8th trap with pulley/tune @ 558rwhp was 99mph. Safe to say the car would have hit low-mid 120's on the big end.
I agree with this. Was he late on the tree? My car has 490 rwhp and I can run a 11.6 @125 and that was just testing some things out. I didn't launch hard because I haven't welded my subframe connectors in yet. That is a huge hp difference ?????
Old 09-08-2013, 07:14 AM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,938
Received 430 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

I agree ....huge hp difference. But it's no secret gt500 seem to dyno well compared to the times they run.

The bigger story here is that bolt-on e85 vette. Anybody take notes on that car......he has his **** together.
Old 09-08-2013, 07:37 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
TheHitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waffle Land
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those cars run well. I would like to see the C6 run the Evo. Also OP did you run ninja again?
Old 09-09-2013, 03:51 AM
  #30  
Teching In
 
markmatthews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that GS pulls like crazy
Old 09-09-2013, 12:38 PM
  #31  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
AWD75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I agree ....huge hp difference. But it's no secret gt500 seem to dyno well compared to the times they run.

The bigger story here is that bolt-on e85 vette. Anybody take notes on that car......he has his **** together.
That GS is a very quick car, and its still on stock internals and stock heads!!!

Originally Posted by TheHitman
Those cars run well. I would like to see the C6 run the Evo. Also OP did you run ninja again?
I will try to arrange c6 vs evo when they come out again to play. I am not planning to run with ninja ever again, even if I have 500whp advantage, however I ran w/another GTR that was made by T1 Race. Vid is on the way

Originally Posted by markmatthews
that GS pulls like crazy
Yup.
Old 09-09-2013, 04:48 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

nice.
Old 09-10-2013, 12:22 PM
  #33  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
brians91formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
Great runs... I actually thought the GT500 did great for its power to weight. I really think the 2013s with the same HP are a whole different breed then the previous runs. Friend of mine just went to the track in his 650whp kenne bell 07 gt500. Went 11.4 at 124....only 2 tenths and 3 mph faster then his 500whp eaton.
I know a 630rwhp 03/04 cobra that only traps 126mph. The guy who owns it is a decent driver too. Some run good some run like **** it seems.



Quick Reply: ***VIDEO***Procharged C6 Corvette vs 2013 GT500 vs Supra vs Evo 8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.