Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

ProCharged 2v vs Vortech LS3 C6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2013, 08:00 PM
  #81  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Proper bolt on ls3 vettes have no problem running 125 +. If you guys think your sc 2vis running with one your just dumb. Sure there are **** cars it There on both sides. But if both are right the 2v loses.


Hey autostupid.....how's that n/a mach super build goin.......oooo..... that's right. .... It didn't.
If you just ignore him he doesn't know what to do.
Old 09-01-2013, 08:02 PM
  #82  
Teching In
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But I haz video proof.
Old 09-01-2013, 08:29 PM
  #83  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A proper full bolt on LS3 vette could easily go 125+ can't say the same for the procharged 2v LOLLLLLL
Old 09-01-2013, 08:30 PM
  #84  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's not 125+. The vette that ran the 2v has been faster.
Old 09-01-2013, 08:31 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2SSARME
If you just ignore him he doesn't know what to do.
Yea you got me
Old 09-01-2013, 08:37 PM
  #86  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Dude those procharged 2vs are nasty!

Old 09-01-2013, 08:41 PM
  #87  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
OneSlowV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 406
Received 218 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

I got money that the camaro would spank automachs GT500
Old 09-01-2013, 08:58 PM
  #88  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
I got money that the camaro would spank automachs GT500
What camero are you talking about?
Old 09-01-2013, 09:04 PM
  #89  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
I got money that the camaro would spank automachs GT500
I think it would be a waste of gas for the camero. automachs moostang has had trouble with a not even full bolt on GTR, this camaro walked a 138 mph low 11 sec GTR on the jug, its no contest.
Old 09-01-2013, 09:09 PM
  #90  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
I think it would be a waste of gas for the camero. automachs moostang has had trouble with a not even full bolt on GTR, this camaro walked a 138 mph low 11 sec GTR on the jug, its no contest.
138 low 11s
Old 09-01-2013, 09:10 PM
  #91  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
138 low 11s

Yuh on street tires and heavy voseens


Edit it was 10.2 at 136 mph
Old 09-01-2013, 09:16 PM
  #92  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
Yuh on street tires and heavy voseens


Edit it was 10.2 at 136 mph
Cool so what camero are we talking about?
Old 09-01-2013, 09:18 PM
  #93  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Cool so what camero are we talking about?
Same camero that walked that forged d1sc 2v in the video above. That was on motor. Camero below

Old 09-01-2013, 09:58 PM
  #94  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
Same camero that walked that forged d1sc 2v in the video above. That was on motor. Camero below

h/c ls1 camaro-b18chatch06 vs 2.8KB cobra-03terminator - YouTube
That's a old vid. Looks like that 2.8 gave him all he could handle.
Old 09-01-2013, 10:08 PM
  #95  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

**** id feel dumb if i needed to upgrade my blower to a KB just to run with a H/C camaro. LMAO.
Old 09-01-2013, 10:13 PM
  #96  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
**** id feel dumb if i needed to upgrade my blower to a KB just to run with a H/C camaro. LMAO.
H/C kit camero
Old 09-01-2013, 10:16 PM
  #97  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
H/C kit camero
That was on motor.
Old 09-01-2013, 10:20 PM
  #98  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
That was on motor.
Then that 2.8 car was a turd.

It runs good for the mods but it's not that damn fast lol

Him on the kit vs a lightly moded c6z.

Old 09-01-2013, 10:21 PM
  #99  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

First of all, I thought a SC'ed LS3 would trap higher than 125 however, if the actual number is closer to 123 or 124mph, then the 2V in the original thread (w/meth and SChrgr) should be a good run if he is also trapping about the same (or a little less).

Looking at the trap speeds for both cars in the original vid, it seems that the race makes a little more sense now. It wasn't that the Vette was slow or having problems, it was more that the 2V was pretty damn quick. Simple as that.

I think we all have in our mind that 2Vs are slouches no matter what mods they have however, when they are set up right or have the right combination, they can run pretty damn hard.

Sometimes you just have to give credit where credit is due.

Last edited by MACHXLR8; 09-01-2013 at 10:27 PM.
Old 09-01-2013, 10:28 PM
  #100  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Then that 2.8 car was a turd.

It runs good for the mods but it's not that damn fast lol

Him on the kit vs a lightly moded c6z.

b18chatch06-h/c spray camaro vs slowvette-magic intake c6z06 60 roll - YouTube
That vette has gone 130mph in its current form IIRC. Hence "magic intake" C6Z. Guy claims intake only and has beat ZR1s before, people call BS but w/e. Self explanatory. Refer to video below. Don't get too butthurt now, the truth hurts mane.



That KB car was actually one of the few cobras here to keep up with the camaro on motor, and IIRC there run was with the Z28 on its nitrous tune.


Quick Reply: ProCharged 2v vs Vortech LS3 C6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.