Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2014 C7 Corvette vs 2014 GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2013, 11:17 AM
  #41  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
at that point you arent even comparing the cars anymore... youre just comparing who has more money. As far as im concerned... the potential of a what a company sells you in a factory car ends with bolt ons. For example with my car. If i start changing the motor/trans and strapping boost to it. Its no longer the potential of the boss 302. Im maximizing a stock longblock/mt82. THATS the potential of the boss 302

And i would rather buy and build an NA car and leave it NA. But i ultimately know i cant beat all blower cars in the long run. Nor would i care to.
Incorrect, you're comparing platforms. Or is my Gto no longer a Gto, because it has a blower?
Old 11-05-2013, 11:25 AM
  #42  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JetBlack98Z
I'm pretty sure the C7 Traps around 120mph in the 1/4 mile, hence the reason why he shut it down for the sake of "Beating him in the 1/4 mile" I maybe way off the mark, its just the way I interpreted it.
So did they agree to stop at 120mph or at a specific distance?
Old 11-05-2013, 11:43 AM
  #43  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
at that point you arent even comparing the cars anymore... youre just comparing who has more money. As far as im concerned... the potential of a what a company sells you in a factory car ends with bolt ons. For example with my car. If i start changing the motor/trans and strapping boost to it. Its no longer the potential of the boss 302. Im maximizing a stock longblock/mt82. THATS the potential of the boss 302

And i would rather buy and build an NA car and leave it NA. But i ultimately know i cant beat all blower cars in the long run. Nor would i care to.
+1 man! We think alike
Old 11-05-2013, 11:43 AM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Incorrect, you're comparing platforms. Or is my Gto no longer a Gto, because it has a blower?
So by your logic... a 1990 C4 Vette has more potential then a 2014 GT500.
Old 11-05-2013, 12:20 PM
  #45  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
So by your logic... a 1990 C4 Vette has more potential then a 2014 GT500.
Now you're comparing apples and oranges. I never said anything about a C4. But to answer you, the platform does. Throw in a ls3 and a turbo, boom. How much more horsepower does a gt500 need to compete with a lighter car like that?
It's your opinion, but I'm one who is all for swapping engines into different a different chassis. Take advantage of the positive factors of it.
Old 11-05-2013, 12:21 PM
  #46  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Lawhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: \
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Now you're comparing apples and oranges. I never said anything about a C4. But to answer you, the platform does. Throw in a ls3 and a turbo, boom. How much more horsepower does a gt500 need to compete with a lighter car like that? It's your opinion, but I'm one who is all for swapping engines into different a different chassis. Take advantage of the positive factors of it.
I like the word "swapping" here


That is all
Old 11-05-2013, 12:24 PM
  #47  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Now you're comparing apples and oranges. I never said anything about a C4. But to answer you, the platform does. Throw in a ls3 and a turbo, boom. How much more horsepower does a gt500 need to compete with a lighter car like that?
It's your opinion, but I'm one who is all for swapping engines into different a different chassis. Take advantage of the positive factors of it.
If you have to swap power plants, you are no longer comparing the potential of what the factory provided to you...IMO....that just comes down to who has more money.....and eventually...who has more traction....which I dont know of a single max effort straight line car that runs faster with IRS.
Old 11-05-2013, 12:37 PM
  #48  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Now you're comparing apples and oranges. I never said anything about a C4. But to answer you, the platform does. Throw in a ls3 and a turbo, boom. How much more horsepower does a gt500 need to compete with a lighter car like that?
It's your opinion, but I'm one who is all for swapping engines into different a different chassis. Take advantage of the positive factors of it.
Originally Posted by evangto87
If you have to swap power plants, you are no longer comparing the potential of what the factory provided to you...IMO....that just comes down to who has more money.....and eventually...who has more traction....which I dont know of a single max effort straight line car that runs faster with IRS.
I understand where both of you are coming from. You both are comparing two completely different things. However, I would take the turbo LS3 C4. You can have a max effort car if that's "your thing", but you'll still be getting beat by built cars that cost a fraction of that. Say what you want, in the end the max effort car will be slower vs. something built to be a rocket. I'll take the rocket.
Old 11-05-2013, 12:42 PM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im just the opposite. I like being different. Cost to get there means nothing to me. Its not a hobby where you cut costs to go faster
Old 11-05-2013, 12:43 PM
  #50  
Teching In
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
If you have to swap power plants, you are no longer comparing the potential of what the factory provided to you...IMO....that just comes down to who has more money.....and eventually...who has more traction....which I dont know of a single max effort straight line car that runs faster with IRS.
Uh what

Old 11-05-2013, 12:45 PM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and it would be faster if it was a max effort SRA car. Theres a reason that its a big deal it still has IRS...because its at a disadvantage..
Old 11-05-2013, 12:46 PM
  #52  
Teching In
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
Im just the opposite. I like being different. Cost to get there means nothing to me. Its not a hobby where you cut costs to go faster
Must be nice
Old 11-05-2013, 12:48 PM
  #53  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not nice at all... that doesnt mean I have money. Im just as broke as anyone else in this hobby. But my point is if i cant afford something... i wont cheap out. Ill just wait till I have the money to get what I want.
Old 11-05-2013, 12:51 PM
  #54  
Teching In
 
2003Cobro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 9
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Video seems pretty clear. C7 gets the hit and has a great launch GT500 comes out late and slow but being the faster car drags down the C7.

Whats there to argue?
Old 11-05-2013, 12:58 PM
  #55  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
Im just the opposite. I like being different. Cost to get there means nothing to me. Its not a hobby where you cut costs to go faster
Oh trust me, I know you can't cut costs with this obsession and expect positive outcomes. What I was getting at was,

Buy Boss 302 for 40k+ along with $X amount of bolt ons.

Buy C4/C5 Vette for under 10k. install lq4 turbo or ls3 turbo or whatever your heart desires for several thousands less, and be faster.

Again, apples to oranges, but just saying.

Not trying to be pushy, just making it clear. I do understand having something so new and cutting edge is nice. But I would go the other route every day, all day.
Old 11-05-2013, 01:05 PM
  #56  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
If you have to swap power plants, you are no longer comparing the potential of what the factory provided to you...IMO....that just comes down to who has more money.....and eventually...who has more traction....which I dont know of a single max effort straight line car that runs faster with IRS.
So if two people with equal money work on a fox body swap versus a gt500, whose car do you think will be faster, assuming equal drivers?
Old 11-05-2013, 01:08 PM
  #57  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would...forever
Old 11-05-2013, 01:40 PM
  #58  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LightningTeg
So we are comparing built racecars? With hundreds of thousands in them?
Old 11-05-2013, 01:42 PM
  #59  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

The c7 will not be as fast as a gt500 mod for mod. Add sc to c7 then swap the new 4.5L whipple on the gt500. Add turbo to c7. Add the TT compound setup to to the gt500. The gt500 will handle making 900-1000whp on stock engine. The c7 I imagine will be like the ls3 and break well before that. Once you start modding it a money game.
Old 11-05-2013, 02:04 PM
  #60  
Staging Lane
 
Knight-Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: san antonio
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
The c7 will not be as fast as a gt500 mod for mod. Add sc to c7 then swap the new 4.5L whipple on the gt500. Add turbo to c7. Add the TT compound setup to to the gt500. The gt500 will handle making 900-1000whp on stock engine. The c7 I imagine will be like the ls3 and break well before that. Once you start modding it a money game.
firstly the vette will not need 1000 hp to beat a 1000 hp Shelby

secondly "id imagine" makes your statement a conjecture

third I like how you put the biggest possible blower on the Shelby
when you can easily swap some pistons and connecting rods in the vette
and match the hp of the Shelby with more reliability than a stock motor on 1000 hp

bottom line is the vette is better has more potential and looks cooler
bring it the **** on .....


Quick Reply: 2014 C7 Corvette vs 2014 GT500



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.