5.0 (Axle back only) vs Camaro SS (Full Bolt ons)
02-26-2014, 02:05 PM
#41
02-26-2014, 07:45 PM
#44
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
That's the next step for the new LT.....if they would do it. I think I read where the LT has 60* of cam swing in it
I know on our bmw's moving the cams around with vvt basically gave them more mid-range with the ability to run to a higher rpm. Now how much the cams moved independent of each other I don't know. My guess would be probably not much. When **** got serious and we needed all the power we could get the VVT went away.
I know on our bmw's moving the cams around with vvt basically gave them more mid-range with the ability to run to a higher rpm. Now how much the cams moved independent of each other I don't know. My guess would be probably not much. When **** got serious and we needed all the power we could get the VVT went away.
02-26-2014, 07:49 PM
#45
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote from someone who claims to have more info about vid:
"I saw this video on the Facebook group for coyotes and the guy who owned the mustang stated mods for both cars. I believe the Camaro is a friend of his. He has only gt500 axle backs and the Camaro has long tubes, and full catback, Dyno Tune and a CAI. The guys also said they dragged raced also beat him there. Mustang owner ran 12.65 on stock tires and the Camaro ran 12.69 with the mods above and radials
Never stated if it was stick or auto"
"I saw this video on the Facebook group for coyotes and the guy who owned the mustang stated mods for both cars. I believe the Camaro is a friend of his. He has only gt500 axle backs and the Camaro has long tubes, and full catback, Dyno Tune and a CAI. The guys also said they dragged raced also beat him there. Mustang owner ran 12.65 on stock tires and the Camaro ran 12.69 with the mods above and radials
Never stated if it was stick or auto"
02-26-2014, 08:42 PM
#47
That's the next step for the new LT.....if they would do it. I think I read where the LT has 60* of cam swing in it
I know on our bmw's moving the cams around with vvt basically gave them more mid-range with the ability to run to a higher rpm. Now how much the cams moved independent of each other I don't know. My guess would be probably not much. When **** got serious and we needed all the power we could get the VVT went away.
I know on our bmw's moving the cams around with vvt basically gave them more mid-range with the ability to run to a higher rpm. Now how much the cams moved independent of each other I don't know. My guess would be probably not much. When **** got serious and we needed all the power we could get the VVT went away.
02-27-2014, 03:16 AM
#51
Anyone saying that is stupid. Embrace technology and build off it. Dont push it away or you will be left behind
