5.0 vs LS1. We know who wins.
03-21-2014, 12:44 PM
#127
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...and my mistake on that earlier post.
Though, my car is the one that dyno'd less. I was using a similar 3.73 auto car with full exhaust, udp, ls6 intake as means of comparison to show my car is not making more power than it should.
Also showing at that point in time that(~5,700 rpm) although at peaks he only did 10 more whp and same torque, at that point in the graph he did 332 whp to my 315 whp and 304 to my 287 lb-ft.
Last edited by 4PointSlow; 03-21-2014 at 12:51 PM.
03-21-2014, 07:31 PM
#128
TECH Resident
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I gotta wonder if some previous owner put a small stall converter in your car before you owned it. I've watched that vid a few times and I never see your cars nose drop down as is typical of a stock stall setup. Normal for a stock stall is to jump out of the hole strong from the initial brake release/torque spike but then for it to bog down for a bit before getting up into the meat of the power band. A stock LS1 - or LT1 or LS2 - is gonna bog, no way around it unless you can manage to spin the tires to keep the rpms up AND keep that spin slow enough that you don't blow the tires off. <<If you were spinning them like that, it is possible to hit that 60' time on street tires but just barely.
Did it on my 01 Z28 A4 2.73 car and it was night and day. No lay over/nose down between shifts.
03-21-2014, 07:35 PM
#129
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
