big hammer

it's because a muscle car was different than a sports car. essentially the muscle car started as your family cruiser with a big badass engine.

stockz

Naa, ugly long heavy nose, pop up headlights

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

This × infinity and beyond

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Sorry but wrong the camaros look plain and nothing special compared to the WS6

ZFreie

Only thing I cant stand is the double set of snouts on the hood, looks like it has two noses

Blown383LS1

iTrader: (23)

I also prefer the looks of the t/a over the Camaros. My 02 Z/28 just looked plain. I didn't like the pewter color either. I put a set of 10 spoke ss wheels on it and it helped it in the looks department but still imo did not look as good as either of my t/a's or my formy. The ss hood and wing help them a lot too. To this day, the 4th gen ws6 is one of the baddest looking factory cars ever made. IMHO of course...

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Thats what makes it look like a monster ready to eat mustangs.

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

Trans ams have an "ugly" nose?

It'llrun

I couldn't (stand to) read it all, but this has been one of the most stupid threads ... EVAAARRRR!

Two poor performers race in what appears to be a "slow contest" and someone is stupid enough to make like it's a bragging point. To top that off, the video doesn't actually show any of the supposed evidence, other than 2 cars were on a track, driving slowly as if afraid to win! What a joke...

OP... I did get far enough to realize, you're not very smart. For example: You talked to Mike, trying to put him down for "assuming" your car is still.... what YOU claim it is! Dunce! Carry on.

6PntHo

iTrader: (2)

Troof!!!!
The 5.0s are stout, granted I pulled one from a 40 roll in my "ugly slow *** 04 gto"

ZFreie

Thank god I don't own some ugly catfish

2003Cobro

WS6 > Camarbro i thought this was common knowledge on the tech.

MACHXLR8

WS6 is a badass car and I love the hood. However, the Camaro SS with center exhaust is pretty nice to. It is close between the two at least in my opinion with a slight tilt to the WS6 just because of the hood.
I'd take either one though.

98CayenneT/A

I don't think it's as much common knowledge as it is a fact ! Not even arguable ! No if and or but ! Just straight 100 % fact

Nick.H

Ehh I like them both

Wes_33

This.

Pretty lame argument when both cars are virtually identical underneath. Take your pick.

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

its not a lame argument in the cosmetic department. performance wise, yes, an idiotic argument, which is why none of us are arguing that........

Wes_33

Meh, I guess. When I here both sides call the other car "ugly" it seems ridiculous to me. Both cars look pretty good in my opinion and share some similarities. Neither of them look as good as the Mustangs of that era.

Oops, I probably shouldn't have said that.

98CayenneT/A

Come on meow, you liquored up? Close one eye, it helps.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Sure....it started in the 50's though. You had 55 bel airs with power packs.....57 fuelie cars.....that lead to 409's with 2 4's and 400+hp in the early 60's. Other manufacturers had stuff like that too. It was hardly a new concept.
Nope
LOL......yea......not so much
Me too.....but I prefer the clean lines of the camaro.