ZR1 vs. centri 5.bro - epic race
12-17-2016, 08:45 AM
#21
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I guess you missed the part where the coyore was on a mustang dyno and the zr1 on a dj. Mustang dynos are known to read low. Not always.....but mostly. One i was on with my old ls1 was about 40~hp off.
12-17-2016, 10:28 AM
#23
lol excellent comments! Thanks for the views, my Z is fairly lightly modded:
Intake
1-7/8" LT's
3" catless back
2.6" upper
Ported stock TB, snout and blower
Fasterproms E85 flexfuel kit
D3 HX kit
Nitrous outlet blower plate kit (not in use for the video)
Valve covers have never been off the car, I'd like to keep it that way at least for a little while longer.
Intake
1-7/8" LT's
3" catless back
2.6" upper
Ported stock TB, snout and blower
Fasterproms E85 flexfuel kit
D3 HX kit
Nitrous outlet blower plate kit (not in use for the video)
Valve covers have never been off the car, I'd like to keep it that way at least for a little while longer.
12-17-2016, 12:44 PM
#25
Why am I not surprised that you were the first one to take that bait? Looks like you don't know the difference between a mustang dyno and a dyno jet, you ignorant jackass. 
You should be forced to carry a potted plant around everywhere you go, to make up for all the oxygen you waste.
You should be forced to carry a potted plant around everywhere you go, to make up for all the oxygen you waste.
680 - 542 = 138HP 16%
680 - 523 = 157HP 19%
Either way, your math skills suck as bad as your driving. If I wanted to make your head explode, I would point out that a blown 5.0L is putting down 130+RWP more than a blown 6.2L
Same.
12-17-2016, 01:06 PM
#26
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, I laid a very subtle trap and I'm not shocked that you an Hio were the ones that walked into it. You two are under the belief that I am ford biased. The dynojet is actually 16%-19% high
680 - 542 = 138HP 16%
680 - 523 = 157HP 19%
Either way, your math skills suck as bad as your driving. If I wanted to make your head explode, I would point out that a blown 5.0L is putting down 130+RWP more than a blown 6.2L
I really didn't. See above.
Same.
680 - 542 = 138HP 16%
680 - 523 = 157HP 19%
Either way, your math skills suck as bad as your driving. If I wanted to make your head explode, I would point out that a blown 5.0L is putting down 130+RWP more than a blown 6.2L
I really didn't. See above.
Same.
And I could out drive you any day of the week. Maybe get a car that has more than 200whp and you'll find out what driving is all about, slow poke.
12-17-2016, 01:21 PM
#28
That's why you lost to a 2V mustang that you claim is way slower than you. Short shifting an automatic while hitting the rev limiter and bogging down, clearly you're ready to race on a professional level.
12-17-2016, 05:34 PM
#29
TECH Enthusiast
lol excellent comments! Thanks for the views, my Z is fairly lightly modded:
Intake
1-7/8" LT's
3" catless back
2.6" upper
Ported stock TB, snout and blower
Fasterproms E85 flexfuel kit
D3 HX kit
Nitrous outlet blower plate kit (not in use for the video)
Valve covers have never been off the car, I'd like to keep it that way at least for a little while longer.
Intake
1-7/8" LT's
3" catless back
2.6" upper
Ported stock TB, snout and blower
Fasterproms E85 flexfuel kit
D3 HX kit
Nitrous outlet blower plate kit (not in use for the video)
Valve covers have never been off the car, I'd like to keep it that way at least for a little while longer.
I'll be following suit in my C7Z... bolt ons/meth/E85(flex).
Gain 100hp+ and stock driveability and gas mileage= perfect.
Nice job man..car hauls ***.
The 5.0 ran real good as well...
12-17-2016, 05:54 PM
#30
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's why I also beat it twice. I'll ask again, where are your racing vids? Or is your **** too slow to even race anyone?