6g vs lbo br0 (neither my car) good race
#24
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't talk about specific numbers or what not on E85 but from real life street racing my hands are full with a lbo E85 br0. It is close but the br0 gets the edge when running E and lbo. I ran 2 different lbo E85 cars and only won 1 out of like 5 runs. I didn't get stomped but the yote definitely has the advantage running E and I can clearly see the difference.
#27
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
And with mod4mod as you used to say you won't beat them now.
What happened to that term anyway? You used to say it alot.
#28
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I can't talk about specific numbers or what not on E85 but from real life street racing my hands are full with a lbo E85 br0. It is close but the br0 gets the edge when running E and lbo. I ran 2 different lbo E85 cars and only won 1 out of like 5 runs. I didn't get stomped but the yote definitely has the advantage running E and I can clearly see the difference.
A good example is poppa. W/o e85 he woulda got thrashed by erry camaro he's ran.......well besides mappin. But he had his own issues.
#30
Teching In
When I had my coyote, I ran E85 because the local 91 was absolute trash and I was tired of driving around with a lot of knock retard.
All I had was Tune (E85), CAI, Offroad H, and an aftermarket muffler.
All I had was Tune (E85), CAI, Offroad H, and an aftermarket muffler.
#32
Hey do you still have the vids of me and you racing from a few years ago?
#33
Teching In
If I do remember correctly, the last time you and I raced, I had the CAI, aftermarket muffler, and a canned tune on the bad 91 lulz. Was fun though.
I sold it and bought a 2012 CTS-V several months ago.
#34
I do not. I didn't think to save any of my races when I mass deleted all of my videos from YouTube before I had to go to court for a careless driving offense
If I do remember correctly, the last time you and I raced, I had the CAI, aftermarket muffler, and a canned tune on the bad 91 lulz. Was fun though.
I sold it and bought a 2012 CTS-V several months ago.
If I do remember correctly, the last time you and I raced, I had the CAI, aftermarket muffler, and a canned tune on the bad 91 lulz. Was fun though.
I sold it and bought a 2012 CTS-V several months ago.
#36
I have my dynosheet. No more midrange gain than peak. It picks up the 6rwhp about 4500rpm and carries to 6500 where it drops off.
#37
I thought E85 made a worthwhile difference on my car before. Thats why I always just ran e85 in it when I drove 2hrs to the 1/4 mile track. I have not run the car on 93... I figured why do it when it can run e85 with the tune. Latest dyno disproves my particular car gaining much at all on it. Perhaps its how my tune is.. I don't know.
Didn't have problems before. Mod4Mod Pray is the only one I would have issues with. And he is pretty much the Ranger of the 6gens right now. Take a look at the fastlist. I am not worried. In general the 6gens seem to be turning out to be a performance flop. Let's throw boost on both and watch the 6gen get the gap band.
Didn't have problems before. Mod4Mod Pray is the only one I would have issues with. And he is pretty much the Ranger of the 6gens right now. Take a look at the fastlist. I am not worried. In general the 6gens seem to be turning out to be a performance flop. Let's throw boost on both and watch the 6gen get the gap band.
#38
It's a outside power source. I always said furd can't get it down w/o a power source. .....looks like i was right. They've just changed it to e85/ftw.
A good example is poppa. W/o e85 he woulda got thrashed by erry camaro he's ran.......well besides mappin. But he had his own issues.
A good example is poppa. W/o e85 he woulda got thrashed by erry camaro he's ran.......well besides mappin. But he had his own issues.
#39
BTW as yall can attest to... I have ALWAYS stated my car did not FEEL much stronger at all on E85 vs 93... everyone here can vouch for me always saying that from the beginning.