HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

No lies have been told by me. The rw of the car on that day was 3250 just like i said.

At stock fcar weight it likely wouldn't change much really. Because i would just add some gear. Probably hurt mph a little and might lose .2 at the most.

Besides it went 11s years ago at nearly stock weight w/o even a dr on it.

Shows wtf your dumbass knows. Maybe you are as bad *** Liarass. Because just like his dumbass you make up these scenarios in your stupid head like they have some truth to them.

Now go take a look at Liarass's sig and tell me who the liar is.

snake95

But you're biased to such a degree that you'll watch your buddy dump money into obviously **** parts for a subpar 347 Ford, as opposed to giving him good advice. There's one of two possible reasons. Either a) you're not knowledgeable enough on Ford anything to even give a good recommendation, or b) you're truly biased and hope to see him underperform so you can jerk it even harder to your bowtie.

Long story short, you keep your mouth shut in order to make sure your comparisons always seem fair between Chevy/Ford, but you write manuals of advice and travel the world to help your GM buddies, while letting your friend with the Ford build a motor making power that could easily be made with stock cam/intake/block/rotating assembly/etc.

snake95

Oh ****, this is good.

Lawhead straight up made a fool of him. What a lying ****.

sw07gt

iTrader: (10)

It's amazing that in Hio's world the Ford's are unbelievably light and the camaro with all that weight reduction, isn't all that light.

Lmao

2003Cobro

Yup hes definitely in a rock and a hardplace here. You hit him with the oldest trick in the book. FACTS. Again he also makes no sense what so ever...So we have a guy that will remove the air bags, crash bars, drill his brake hubs, whole saw, every weight loss trick possible, but somehow he also leaves his spare and jack in the trunk and runs a full tank and "doesnt really care"....come one DUG your making yourself look dumber than normal.

Woah lets not get crazy. I mean yeah without the motor swap and extreme weight reduction hed be in the low 12s. With the motor swap at stock weight hed be about 11.70s.

sw07gt

iTrader: (10)

All the effort he did and his car only gets ~300 lbs lighter than stock. His buddy's fox however, just halfasses a setup and gets over 700 lbs out of his car.

Guess Ford is superior.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

He bought the car sperm95. He didn't build it or the motor. He did rebuild the motor on a budget.

Hell he even borrowed some of my bits to do some porting on his ****. So much for me not helping him

I actually bought bits years ago when he was a teenager to help him port up his other fox. So much for me not helping a fellow hotrodder

Lol.....Liarass got manhandled here. I straight up let him hang himself.

Last i checked a 24xx-26xx lb car is lighter than a nearly 3100lb car.

Can anyone confirm this?

The only one here that spreadany facts was myself. The rest was made up bullshit by you guys.

It ran 11.8 at nearly stock weight almost 120. No drag pak...no dr very very basic. Shitty 1 3/4 mid length headers and all. And no rockers

R6cowboy

iTrader: (3)

Just my observation. Doug had mentioned his car has been 2980 lbs in its lightest form (w/o driver, very minimal fuel no spare & jack). RW "that" day was 3250 with him in it, 3/4 tank gas, spare tire & jack. So, say Doug is roughly a 150lbs homeboy. Gasoline is 6.3 lbs/gal. Spare & jack approx. 30-35lbs.

3250-150(homeboy)=3100
3100-80(13 gal. fuel)=3020
3020-30(spare/jack)=2990

I f*ck with Hio and give him **** too, but I take no sides. Please let me know if I'm off somewhere.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Well....when you start at 300-400lb lighter you tend to stay lighter.

They great part is i know the differences between the 2 cars because of fairly indepth builds. The rest of ya don't have a ****** clue. That is very apparent

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Thank you much sir.

Since the scales was toggleing between 2980 and 3000 (quarry scales they read in 20lb increments) that day i would say that is spot on.


R6 just threw the ******* to Liarass w/o even trying

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

you already straight up lied and got caught

sw07gt

iTrader: (10)

A hatch fox is not 300-400 lbs lighter than a hardtop 4th gen. Ford's must just lose weight a lot easier if he was able to add a cage and still get the car 700 lbs lighter than stock. You've cut and drilled every piece of your car, no cage and not even lost half what he did.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Not even a little.

What did happen is i let you make a fool of yourself once again.

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

Turbomach has been trying to outrun Hio for years. Hio still helps him to a degree. Hio worked on his Mach a lot too. Also his other fox he had. He also has 5.0bro now too.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I already said what his one hatch weighed with nothing more than a drag pak and ac compressor gone. Yes they start out 300-400lb lighter depending on year and options.

sw07gt

iTrader: (10)

No. But set that aside for the moment. He was still able to more than double your weight reduction while adding a cage. So Ford is superior?

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Holy **** all the furd crews theories are getting blown the **** up.

I feel like austin powers

Lawhead

iTrader: (14)

I asked if you ever had your car down under 3k in race trim w/o you

You said no

R6cowboy

iTrader: (3)

It's f'n Friday and for the work week I've had, my noggin is near capacity for the week. It took quite a few of brain cells to figure that one out. Lol

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

If i went the same route with a fcar it would likely loose more weight than the fox. You see when you have more weight there is more weight to lose.

You're not that ****** smart are you.