96 cobra vs 95 trans am
#382
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
How bout finding some et's for that motor. That dyno is likely the happiest on earth. Yes the 5.7 can make that or more. A friend made 620 on a engine dyno with stock 243 heads and a hydraulic cam. Not even turning it that hard.. It's a dirt car ls motor. Lots of room for improvement on that motor. But you don't see me comparing engine dyno to whp dynos.
Hhhhmmmmm....nothing near what you claim here.
https://www.svtperformance.com/forum...4-dohc.140331/
Hell....they mostly don't even want to talk about it...lol
Hhhhmmmmm....nothing near what you claim here.
https://www.svtperformance.com/forum...4-dohc.140331/
Hell....they mostly don't even want to talk about it...lol
#385
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That is quite an accomplishment for sure. You may likely not see an answer to that from an LS, maybe nof ever. Would it be imposssible, no. There would have to be substantial reason to spend that kind of money. In most cases, it makes more sense to go with an aftermarket block, heads, etc. The mod motor used to do that had absolutley zero stock mod parts left on it.
#386
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yup....untouched ports and stock valves. I don't think they were the light weight valves either. 5.3 ironblock(ruels say has to be iron block) bottom bored to 5.7. Wet sump with external pump, hydraulic cam. Said he used junk weisco off the shelf pistions, stock crank with good rods. It was built to be a budget race motor for the dirt guys. Carb'd to. It was a experiment. Won it's race a couple weeks ago. He wanted to use stock rods but he had these on the shelf. He said he basically wanted to build one like anyone could in their garage.
His personal race motor is a simple 408, gmpp ls3 heads with springs to match the cam but other than that untouched. Same cam as 5.7 and makes 720.
His personal race motor is a simple 408, gmpp ls3 heads with springs to match the cam but other than that untouched. Same cam as 5.7 and makes 720.
#387
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#389
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That is quite an accomplishment for sure. You may likely not see an answer to that from an LS, maybe nof ever. Would it be imposssible, no. There would have to be substantial reason to spend that kind of money. In most cases, it makes more sense to go with an aftermarket block, heads, etc. The mod motor used to do that had absolutley zero stock mod parts left on it.
#390
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea they have loads of average power. Far from a peaky hp number. Just like the 3400lb r/w pure street 4.6s that made ~460 and trap 130+. The car that made 615+ went 150+.
#391
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
How bout finding some et's for that motor. That dyno is likely the happiest on earth. Yes the 5.7 can make that or more. A friend made 620 on a engine dyno with stock 243 heads and a hydraulic cam. Not even turning it that hard.. It's a dirt car ls motor. Lots of room for improvement on that motor. But you don't see me comparing engine dyno to whp dynos.
Hhhhmmmmm....nothing near what you claim here.
https://www.svtperformance.com/forum...4-dohc.140331/
Hell....they mostly don't even want to talk about it...lol
Hhhhmmmmm....nothing near what you claim here.
https://www.svtperformance.com/forum...4-dohc.140331/
Hell....they mostly don't even want to talk about it...lol
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
#393
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Now lets get with more common h/c builds. You seem to be avoiding that.
I've saud that before myself.
#395
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually there isn't much legit about it at all. I didn't even see any info on the engine. It makes way more than the nearest 5.4. Then you claim it goes 10-12 mph faster than you while having 100+ less hp.
Now lets get with more common h/c builds. You seem to be avoiding that.
I've saud that before myself.
Now lets get with more common h/c builds. You seem to be avoiding that.
I've saud that before myself.
A h/c 5.4 is not common for obvious reasons. However boost for boost mod for mod the 5.7 has nothing on it. The stock ported LS heads are junk compared to a ported GT head.
#397
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No I'm not actually
H/c 5.4 is not common because they are a pile of ****. Apparently it takes a 9k rpm race engine with no doubts lots of custom **** to even get in the ball park. .....open your eyes dipshit. You even failed at making them go na.
I think i would be rather depressed at 9k+ rpm and only 600whp to be honest. That car is likely much lighter than mine and you still haven't posted **** for builds or info on the cars. All this confirms you post nothing but bullshit.
Oh with the stips.
No it does not actually. There are 2 others that make 590+ sae. Open your eyes **** boy. Yea it went faster with less power because it weights about what your car does not 3700lbs. Not to mention 9k + shift points and average power out the ***.
A h/c 5.4 is not common for obvious reasons. However boost for boost mod for mod the 5.7 has nothing on it. The stock ported LS heads are junk compared to a ported GT head.
No it does not actually. There are 2 others that make 590+ sae. Open your eyes **** boy. Yea it went faster with less power because it weights about what your car does not 3700lbs. Not to mention 9k + shift points and average power out the ***.
A h/c 5.4 is not common for obvious reasons. However boost for boost mod for mod the 5.7 has nothing on it. The stock ported LS heads are junk compared to a ported GT head.
I think i would be rather depressed at 9k+ rpm and only 600whp to be honest. That car is likely much lighter than mine and you still haven't posted **** for builds or info on the cars. All this confirms you post nothing but bullshit.
#400
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No I'm not actually
H/c 5.4 is not common because they are a pile of ****. Apparently it takes a 9k rpm race engine with no doubts lots of custom **** to even get in the ball park. .....open your eyes dipshit. You even failed at making them go na.
I think i would be rather depressed at 9k+ rpm and only 600whp to be honest. That car is likely much lighter than mine and you still haven't posted **** for builds or info on the cars. All this confirms you post nothing but bullshit.
H/c 5.4 is not common because they are a pile of ****. Apparently it takes a 9k rpm race engine with no doubts lots of custom **** to even get in the ball park. .....open your eyes dipshit. You even failed at making them go na.
I think i would be rather depressed at 9k+ rpm and only 600whp to be honest. That car is likely much lighter than mine and you still haven't posted **** for builds or info on the cars. All this confirms you post nothing but bullshit.