302 vs 305 vs 305 sadface GM
#22
^ Well it kind of is. Most people don't even think of the C4 for a build. Most are stock, or Stock'ish. But you really can't get a better platform for a build. And there damn good looking too. And yes, you can always do a solid axle if need be. For full disclosure. I do own a C4.
#23
7 Second Club
Fox is superior, most LS guys know this.
#24
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
^ Well it kind of is. Most people don't even think of the C4 for a build. Most are stock, or Stock'ish. But you really can't get a better platform for a build. And there damn good looking too. And yes, you can always do a solid axle if need be. For full disclosure. I do own a C4.
I have 2 c4s at the moment. One i bought just because it was cheap and ran good. The other was just cheap, in parts but all there.
Perfect cars to eff with.
#28
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet there is more 305 cars with the 305 still in them, than the fox with the 5.0 in it. Isn't it standard procedure now when you buy a fox to throw that motor away and put a sbc/LS in it lol?
#29
TECH Enthusiast
The electronics on a c4 with LS1 must be a nightmare. Saw a conversion on a corvette site. Hats off to whoever has done it.
#30
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "street car" fast list at my local track has/had (I don't keep up with it much) I guess a fox with a BBC and a whole he'll of a lot of n2o. I only saw it from a distance one night so I can't say for sure it has a BBC. But a BBC fox sounds Very BA
#31
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
Holy effing 80's mustaches. All of those guys were creepy and looked like my uncles 30 years ago.
Lol at 87mph trap speed.
Looks wise the Camaro has it hands down. The 5.0 is just ugly. And what was up with it running like 75 series tires? Nothing says performance like a nice 205/95/14.
Good stuff though. I watched that sow regularly in the 90's.
Lol at 87mph trap speed.
Looks wise the Camaro has it hands down. The 5.0 is just ugly. And what was up with it running like 75 series tires? Nothing says performance like a nice 205/95/14.
Good stuff though. I watched that sow regularly in the 90's.
#34
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
31 Posts
Absolutely the ford purests swap it out for a ford motor of sorts. Not all but the most I have seen they just don't use the original motor. Most now around here just use a old chebby motor.
The "street car" fast list at my local track has/had (I don't keep up with it much) I guess a fox with a BBC and a whole he'll of a lot of n2o. I only saw it from a distance one night so I can't say for sure it has a BBC. But a BBC fox sounds Very BA
The "street car" fast list at my local track has/had (I don't keep up with it much) I guess a fox with a BBC and a whole he'll of a lot of n2o. I only saw it from a distance one night so I can't say for sure it has a BBC. But a BBC fox sounds Very BA
All those GTOs, Chevelles, Novas, Camaros, TAs, Corvettes, Monzas, Chevy 2s, Monte Carlos, etc etc......and still end up with a FoMoCo chassis. Quite the compliment to Ford.
Dollar to dollar performance the 8.2 deck or 9.5 deck SBF wins all day. EVEN with the handicap the 8.2 has of needing a Dart block to make big power. Still better return per dollar.
#35
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
Anyone who denies this is definitely a fanboy.
A Camaro should have never been offered in 305. Hell, the 350 had hell with a notch 302.
A Mustang should have came with a 351.
Things would have been awesome if the Camaro would have had sequencial fuel injection, 350, 5 or six speed.
A Camaro should have never been offered in 305. Hell, the 350 had hell with a notch 302.
A Mustang should have came with a 351.
Things would have been awesome if the Camaro would have had sequencial fuel injection, 350, 5 or six speed.
#36
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To each there own I guess.
#37
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're on crack if you believe this Literally step one in the 305 handbook for performance: Swap in a 350.
It's nothing to do with Ford purists. It's GM guys who take a look at the 3 zillion GM models that have been offered over the years, and still let common sense lead them to buying a chassis that actually works...the Mustang.
All those GTOs, Chevelles, Novas, Camaros, TAs, Corvettes, Monzas, Chevy 2s, Monte Carlos, etc etc......and still end up with a FoMoCo chassis. Quite the compliment to Ford.
Dollar to dollar performance the 8.2 deck or 9.5 deck SBF wins all day. EVEN with the handicap the 8.2 has of needing a Dart block to make big power. Still better return per dollar.
It's nothing to do with Ford purists. It's GM guys who take a look at the 3 zillion GM models that have been offered over the years, and still let common sense lead them to buying a chassis that actually works...the Mustang.
All those GTOs, Chevelles, Novas, Camaros, TAs, Corvettes, Monzas, Chevy 2s, Monte Carlos, etc etc......and still end up with a FoMoCo chassis. Quite the compliment to Ford.
Dollar to dollar performance the 8.2 deck or 9.5 deck SBF wins all day. EVEN with the handicap the 8.2 has of needing a Dart block to make big power. Still better return per dollar.
Some ford guys believe a ford should stay ford powerd. Not a big deal. Both have had more R&D than the space shuttle. And can get it done.
And plenty of GM chassis cars out there getting it done. And I've seen guys go from a fox to something else. The faster you go the less ford/gm/mopar chassis have to so with it anyway . It's light and has a short wheel base. . It's a good street strip application, but there is plenty of other cars going A to B effectively
#39
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Some ford guys believe a ford should stay ford powerd. Not a big deal. Both have had more R&D than the space shuttle. And can get it done.
And plenty of GM chassis cars out there getting it done. And I've seen guys go from a fox to something else. The faster you go the less ford/gm/mopar chassis have to so with it anyway . It's light and has a short wheel base. . It's a good street strip application, but there is plenty of other cars going A to B effectively
And plenty of GM chassis cars out there getting it done. And I've seen guys go from a fox to something else. The faster you go the less ford/gm/mopar chassis have to so with it anyway . It's light and has a short wheel base. . It's a good street strip application, but there is plenty of other cars going A to B effectively
#40
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
Anyone who denies this is definitely a fanboy.
A Camaro should have never been offered in 305. Hell, the 350 had hell with a notch 302.
A Mustang should have came with a 351.
Things would have been awesome if the Camaro would have had sequencial fuel injection, 350, 5 or six speed.
A Camaro should have never been offered in 305. Hell, the 350 had hell with a notch 302.
A Mustang should have came with a 351.
Things would have been awesome if the Camaro would have had sequencial fuel injection, 350, 5 or six speed.