Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

S550 vs LSX GTO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2019, 10:01 PM
  #101  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,971
Received 466 Likes on 365 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

You simply don't know wtf you're talking about mac......nothing unusual about that tho.
Old 03-22-2019, 10:02 PM
  #102  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
HpipeFlowmasterStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 21
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
maybe using the biggest cam out there with all the bolt ons that one certain people do sure. But not everyone does the biggest cam and not everyone buys electric water pumps or under drive pulley etc... So no it's shouldn't. Also dynos arent consistent either mustang dynos read lower than dyno jets. Hell you can have two dyno jets and run the same car on both and get different numbers there is way too many variables and making an assumption with no experience is dumb.
Jake has plenty experience. He has about 20 slips with all 9 second runs. Even with him starting in 2nd, spinning then short shifting.. its just those 2 valves he cant beat..
Old 03-23-2019, 06:24 AM
  #103  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

King Jake owns you
Old 03-23-2019, 06:25 AM
  #104  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
maybe using the biggest cam out there with all the bolt ons that one certain people do sure. But not everyone does the biggest cam and not everyone buys electric water pumps or under drive pulley etc... So no it's shouldn't. Also dynos arent consistent either mustang dynos read lower than dyno jets. Hell you can have two dyno jets and run the same car on both and get different numbers there is way too many variables and making an assumption with no experience is dumb.
You don't know jack ****, Mr. 1,000 pounds has no effect on gas mileage.
Old 03-23-2019, 01:26 PM
  #105  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You simply don't know wtf you're talking about mac......nothing unusual about that tho.
so a 228 cam upgrade being dynoed on a mustang dyno will dyno the same as a ms4 cam being dynoed on a dyno jet? Both using stock rocker arms?
Old 03-23-2019, 03:36 PM
  #106  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,971
Received 466 Likes on 365 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

You see....something else dumb from you
Old 03-23-2019, 05:22 PM
  #107  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So in conclusion im right good talk
Old 03-23-2019, 05:29 PM
  #108  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To put it into perspective I guided my brother in what to buy for his parts for his gto, he out down 425rwhp (which is very respectable) he now has a HCI and stalled and gears iirc
Old 03-23-2019, 05:36 PM
  #109  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
Old 03-23-2019, 09:58 PM
  #110  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Chris25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 774
Received 114 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
umm that's a HCI GTO that makes 425 ? That's pretty terrible even for a stalled auto I mean I have a way smaller cam and my car should Dyno just under 500 now
Old 03-23-2019, 11:05 PM
  #111  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,971
Received 466 Likes on 365 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
So in conclusion im right good talk
Originally Posted by "MAC"
To put it into perspective I guided my brother in what to buy for his parts for his gto, he out down 425rwhp (which is very respectable) he now has a HCI and stalled and gears iirc
Originally Posted by "MAC"
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
and for more perspective i put down 26whp more than the combo you so hand crafted with a bolt on ls6. Your brother must be dumber than you to listen to your dumbass
Old 03-24-2019, 04:41 AM
  #112  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
So in conclusion im right good talk
Originally Posted by "MAC"
To put it into perspective I guided my brother in what to buy for his parts for his gto, he out down 425rwhp (which is very respectable) he now has a HCI and stalled and gears iirc
Originally Posted by "MAC"
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
I guess your brother is a retard just like you.
Old 03-24-2019, 07:28 AM
  #113  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I figured you retards would say that, none of y'all have any experience and are too stupid or blinded by GM ball sack. The fact is it was 425rwhp on a mustang dyno that reads at least 14% lower than a higher reading dyno jet. You do the math.
Old 03-24-2019, 08:36 AM
  #114  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 316 Likes on 245 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Dino racing is fun!
Old 03-24-2019, 09:26 AM
  #115  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Chris25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 774
Received 114 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
I figured you retards would say that, none of y'all have any experience and are too stupid or blinded by GM ball sack. The fact is it was 425rwhp on a mustang dyno that reads at least 14% lower than a higher reading dyno jet. You do the math.
Sorry but even on a mustang Dyno those numbers are low it should be making 450+ to the wheels.
Old 03-24-2019, 09:35 AM
  #116  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 316 Likes on 245 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Chris25
Sorry but even on a mustang Dyno those numbers are low it should be making 450+ to the wheels.
Who you think has the highest trapping dino in North America?
Old 03-24-2019, 10:20 AM
  #117  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,971
Received 466 Likes on 365 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
I figured you retards would say that, none of y'all have any experience and are too stupid or blinded by GM ball sack. The fact is it was 425rwhp on a mustang dyno that reads at least 14% lower than a higher reading dyno jet. You do the math.
i seem to have way more actual experience than you. Picking ******* parts out of a catalog does not make for great experience.
Old 03-24-2019, 10:35 AM
  #118  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris25
Sorry but even on a mustang Dyno those numbers are low it should be making 450+ to the wheels.
no it shouldn't not all dynos read the same this dyno reads lower than most mustang dynos to begin with on a dyno jet he would be over 500rwhp. This is why it's hilarious that you and the others are saying what some should do vs reality lol for example my 2010 camaro ss made 349 rwhp on the same dyno yet on dyno jet they have made 380+ to the wheels hmm... Sorta weird considering what you and hio and Jake have been saying huh
Old 03-24-2019, 10:37 AM
  #119  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
i seem to have way more actual experience than you. Picking ******* parts out of a catalog does not make for great experience.
says the guy that said all HCI ls2 should be over 500rwhp
Old 03-24-2019, 10:41 AM
  #120  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,635
Received 68 Likes on 57 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Run the car. Dyno numbers don't mean ****.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.