S550 vs LSX GTO
#102
Banned
Thread Starter
maybe using the biggest cam out there with all the bolt ons that one certain people do sure. But not everyone does the biggest cam and not everyone buys electric water pumps or under drive pulley etc... So no it's shouldn't. Also dynos arent consistent either mustang dynos read lower than dyno jets. Hell you can have two dyno jets and run the same car on both and get different numbers there is way too many variables and making an assumption with no experience is dumb.
#104
maybe using the biggest cam out there with all the bolt ons that one certain people do sure. But not everyone does the biggest cam and not everyone buys electric water pumps or under drive pulley etc... So no it's shouldn't. Also dynos arent consistent either mustang dynos read lower than dyno jets. Hell you can have two dyno jets and run the same car on both and get different numbers there is way too many variables and making an assumption with no experience is dumb.
#108
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To put it into perspective I guided my brother in what to buy for his parts for his gto, he out down 425rwhp (which is very respectable) he now has a HCI and stalled and gears iirc
#109
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
#110
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
#111
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
#112
He has a 238/244 cam, fast 102 mid runner, tea ported ls2 heads, nwTb. All that and it made 425rwhp but if you listen to Doug and the derp it should be way more lol. I advised him with the bolt ons, and convinced him to go heads cam the tuner speced everything out for him.
#113
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I figured you retards would say that, none of y'all have any experience and are too stupid or blinded by GM ball sack. The fact is it was 425rwhp on a mustang dyno that reads at least 14% lower than a higher reading dyno jet. You do the math.
#114
7 Second Club
Dino racing is fun!
#116
7 Second Club
#118
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no it shouldn't not all dynos read the same this dyno reads lower than most mustang dynos to begin with on a dyno jet he would be over 500rwhp. This is why it's hilarious that you and the others are saying what some should do vs reality lol for example my 2010 camaro ss made 349 rwhp on the same dyno yet on dyno jet they have made 380+ to the wheels hmm... Sorta weird considering what you and hio and Jake have been saying huh