Injector info for those with 98-02 PCM's using HPT. Since there isn't a PID listed for it in the older PCM's you can use:

IPW * RPM / 1200

That will give you the percentage, plotted on either the spark or VE axis's. I use spark since you can determine if spark advances did anything by the resulting decrease in PW, since the engine will be making more power, thus running more efficiently if spark is in the right spot. Worth a mention since that came up. Useful info to someone out there.

 

Seems as tho the sts v and the 03 cobro ran 1/4 in the same times with the caddy being much heavier. So i would say something is off with your whp. 03/04 cobros were known dyno queens tho.

 

Both of them ran mid 12s?

 

Neither ran mid 12s. Low 13s and once in a while a dip into the 12s was on par for both.

 

Those cars can run low 13s to high 12s depending on air and where the cams are positioned. MPH anywhere from 108-113. Keep in mind they never get out of third gear. They can hit high 170s top end. Exhaust,gears and a tune(prom) and they are capable of 118-120MPH. Their top end is pretty impressive

 

I'd rather have the termi over the caddy unless it's a ctsv.

 

You gonna have to have a pulley for 118-120. They came with 3.55 gears and were very much in 4th at the end of the qtr. If anything they kinda laid down in 4th a bit from what i have seen......and were known to blow up on long 5th gear pulls.

I would rather have the cobro to. But if you're a fella wanting a sporty large 4door luxury sedan with a auto then the sts v wasn't a bad choice in that era.

 

I was talking about the ZR-1 Hio. Not Terminator. Terminator was slower stock to stock

 

Huh cause the fastest ls1 camaro ran 12s and you claim they run 12s so using that logic the termi ran mid 12s so it's definitely a mod 12s car stock but for this argument you gonna play stupid and say they don't run 12s ok hypocrite.

 

Oh ok.....yea the zr1 was no doubt in 3rd.
Stfu dumbass. You're really just a dumb bitch. They shoulda left you bant.

 

HOC rages hard when caught saying dumb stuff.

Mac ftw!

 

Oh look mac's daddy. I'm sure you're proud of him

 

Hio gets real mad when people point out how the 03-04 Cobras raped f-bodies when both were stock, and when bolt ons started, it got uglier for the f-body

 

Eh no. 13.2@107 is the best the STS-V did, the Cobra did a best of 12.9@112, both were car and driver. Then you look at the XLR-V, which is nearly the same weight as the Cobra, which did a best of 12.7@112. So, same trap speed, same weight, and slightly better ET, likely due to the auto, but claimed 50HP better.

 

They didn't really...only slightly faster. And it took the 03 cobro a supercharger and steeper gears to get that .2-.3.....along with a extra a cost of a extra $12k. Mac is just a dumbass and deserves to be treated like one.

 

So like i said the 4.4 accelerated the car better.....thanks for confirming.

 

Actually you said 4.6l made more power than the ford 4.6L which was proven wrong, not that you'd ever admit it. .2 better ET can easily be explained by the auto vs stick, and identical trap speeds.

 

No the 4.4s were dogs that leaked and couldn't stay on the road long enough to complete a 1/4 mile pass. Those motors were complete ******* junk. Idc if they ran 10s from the factory, they were a garbage design.

 

Big deal dude...i meant the supercharged version. So no i wasn't proven wrong.

The only way you believe that the .2 is because auto on those cars is because you can't drive a stick. I'm not one that believes a auto is faster. The mustangs of that era were much much slower with a auto.

 

You said 4.6L, you were wrong. The 6L80 is a hell of a long way from a 4R70W.