Stock 1/4 mile and 0-60 times
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock 1/4 mile and 0-60 times
I am not sure if this will help or if everyone has already seen this, but it might stop some of the bench racing. This list covers stock vehicle 1/4 mile and 0-60 times as reported by various magazines. It should at least give people an idea of what the cars they are about to race are capable of stock, and then figure in mods and you can get a decent idea of what you are about to race.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Hope this helps,
Alex
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Hope this helps,
Alex
#3
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems like they get most of their times from good sources. The times also seem revy realistic. I love the site, and just thought I would share with anyone who hasn't found it.
~Alex
~Alex
#4
1990 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 6.8 15.1
1992 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 6.7 15.2
1994 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 6.6 14.6
1992 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 6.7 15.2
1994 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 6.6 14.6
#6
Originally Posted by LS1Lust
I am not sure if this will help or if everyone has already seen this, but it might stop some of the bench racing. This list covers stock vehicle 1/4 mile and 0-60 times as reported by various magazines. It should at least give people an idea of what the cars they are about to race are capable of stock, and then figure in mods and you can get a decent idea of what you are about to race.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Hope this helps,
Alex
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Hope this helps,
Alex
bench racing encylopedia, now we GOTTA sticky this
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used to go there a lot, it's great for giving you a general idea but unless they were all recorded in a a head to head comparison there are simply too many variables.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by diambo4life
Why the discrepancy? It's the same damn car. That however is not bad for a car that came out in the early 90's. Mid 6's knot to 60mph was stellar back then. Pretty much identical to the Z28 Camaro of the same year.
How does a 94 Talon run a 14.6 with a 6.6 0-60 and AWD? They must have killer top end, or the site is not as accurate as we thought.
#9
Originally Posted by 2000 SILVERADO
How does a 94 Talon run a 14.6 with a 6.6 0-60 and AWD? They must have killer top end, or the site is not as accurate as we thought.
#10
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, it might not be the most accurate on all the times, but it is still good for a general idea. Might help get rid of some of those, "So my friend has a (insert can here) I was wondering what it could run, and if I would win."
~Alex
~Alex
#12
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wesmanw02
They don't run 14.6 in the 1/4, thats ridiculous. More like low 15's, obviously that number is off.
I agree with you that it's not normal, or necassarily likely, but I definitely wouldn't say that it CAN'T be done, considering that sometimes the stock boost level varies from car to car, usually between 8 and 12psi. If the car was on 11 or 12 psi then that 14.6 should be no problem.
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (5 Speed) 4.7 13.2 (MT Feb 05)
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (Auto) 5.6 13.88 (MT Apr 04)
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (Auto) 5.6 13.88 (MT Apr 04)
#17
1991 GMC Syclone 5.3 14.1 (M/T Sept 91)
1993 GMC Typhoon 5.3 14.1 (M/T June 93)
??The trucks running the same timeswhile the weight is ~500 difference? The Syclone was a bit quicker as tested.
Syclone:
http://www.sportmachines.com/magrack...ver_11-90.html
Typhoon:
http://www.sportmachines.com/magrack...iver_3-92.html
...just to clear it up a bit.
1993 GMC Typhoon 5.3 14.1 (M/T June 93)
??The trucks running the same timeswhile the weight is ~500 difference? The Syclone was a bit quicker as tested.
Syclone:
http://www.sportmachines.com/magrack...ver_11-90.html
Typhoon:
http://www.sportmachines.com/magrack...iver_3-92.html
...just to clear it up a bit.
#18
Originally Posted by nokeman
Does this make much sense. I know an auto may be a little slower but damn!
So the auto is about a 8/10ths slower in 0-60MPH and about a half second slower in the 1/4 mile. Manual is the only way to go.
#19
Originally Posted by Wesmanw02
They don't run 14.6 in the 1/4, thats ridiculous. More like low 15's, obviously that number is off.
Actually, it can but again, it's not common. Generally accepted stock times for a 1G AWD 5-speed are 14.8-15.2. I never got to run mine at the track while it was bone stock. By the time I got it home a full turboback exhaust system was in the mail.
#20
Originally Posted by diambo4life
Actually, it can but again, it's not common. Generally accepted stock times for a 1G AWD 5-speed are 14.8-15.2. I never got to run mine at the track while it was bone stock. By the time I got it home a full turboback exhaust system was in the mail.