LS1 slow up top?
05-14-2006, 08:32 PM
#21
Banned
iTrader: (92)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My M6 Firehawk bone stock down to the paper filter ran 13.3 @ 107.8 mph with a disgusting 2.23 60 foot. (lack of traction on street tires)
My car loves to be spun and now with all the mods making 420 rwhp N/A it's an absolute beast up top.
This is an LS1 you won't be seeing in your mirror.
My car loves to be spun and now with all the mods making 420 rwhp N/A it's an absolute beast up top.
This is an LS1 you won't be seeing in your mirror.
05-14-2006, 08:39 PM
#23
Banned
iTrader: (92)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
my buddies bone stock a4 traped 109 and ran 12.90's, this was a full weight 02Z28 3.42 car.
05-15-2006, 12:33 AM
#28
Who knows, im really depressed though, No WAY my setup should only trap 100 mph. But he was dead even w/me from a 20-100 roll (friend's S10). As SOON as I get the carb on it, I will be taking her to the strip
05-15-2006, 02:25 AM
#29
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jassick
Maybe you ran a car that's running like mine. I ran a 8.95@81.76 with a 2.15 60ft. completely stock.
05-15-2006, 07:21 AM
#30
Originally Posted by Stanger88
Not to be a jackass and split hairs, but with a 2.2 vs. his 2.0, could he have managed maybe a 103-104 trap speed? Thats what I think he would need to hang w/me like he did from a roll. Is that possible? He ran 13.611@100.7 w/ a 2.0 60'
look at the Reaction Time. There's your difference!
05-15-2006, 08:10 PM
#32
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: hatboro, pa
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my old ls1 bone stock went ONE 13.8 @ 102mph, then 14's @ 101 or 100mph. i put a thermostat, fan switch, and a lid on it and it went 13.40's @ 104mph consistently.
so yes, they can be pretty slow in stock form,- especially in the 2.73 variety but like said the 215-225*coolant temps i think is the real killer.
so yes, they can be pretty slow in stock form,- especially in the 2.73 variety but like said the 215-225*coolant temps i think is the real killer.
05-15-2006, 08:11 PM
#33
Administrator
Originally Posted by Stanger88
no stock auto has 3.42's
I'll just chime in to confirm that autos come with either a 2.73 or a 3.23, not
3.42's...just for clarification sake.
My '00 A4 Z28 went 13.67 @ 105mph if I recall correctly. That was 6 years
ago now.
05-15-2006, 08:56 PM
#35
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slow Vette
mine did that with just an intake and catback 
Also, for a previous poster, reaction time has nothing to do with your ET.
05-16-2006, 07:28 AM
#36
TECH Addict
Originally Posted by Stanger88
I killed that A4 LS1 Z28 00' as listed in my "ate a catfish" post. My friend Joey with his S10 and a 350 hung DEAD with me from 20-105 roll race. THen at the track he ran 13.6@100.7 Do ls1 a4'S trap high 90's or something!?!? Whats the deal!?
Originally Posted by Stanger88
no stock auto has 3.42's
If you easily beat one from a roll it may be driver, or their car isn't running right. Or that they went from a dead spot in the gearing. The 3.23 cars seem to suffer dead spots more so than the 2.73 cars due to the speeds that many people street race.
SOTP a LS1 (2.73) will pull really well upto ~120mph, still pull good to 140mph then it's a bit slower from 140mph to the 158mph limiter but it's still pulling, if you remove the speed limiter I feel pretty sure you'd see the high side of 165mph before you completely run out of rpms.
05-16-2006, 01:18 PM
#37
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stanger88
All i know is the Z28 saw my tail lights from a 75 punch and my friends S10 was right even with me. Yet my friends S10 trapped 100.7 Trying to figure out wth!?
05-18-2006, 12:21 PM
#38
On The Tree
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am the s10 owner and figured I would post up. I ran a 13.611 @ 100.7. The breakdown of the slip is as follows:
R/T .006
60' 2.056
330 5.724
1/8 8.746
mph 81.06
1000 11.376
1/4 13.611
mph 100.7
My truck falls on its face after 100 but I would have liked to have a sub-13.5 run. Maybe next time.
R/T .006
60' 2.056
330 5.724
1/8 8.746
mph 81.06
1000 11.376
1/4 13.611
mph 100.7
My truck falls on its face after 100 but I would have liked to have a sub-13.5 run. Maybe next time.
05-18-2006, 09:28 PM
#39
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just thought I'd chime in. Best time is in sig. That was on 245 street tires with a 1.95 60'. I think its a pretty good trap for an A4 w/ 2.73s for the few mods it has.
05-18-2006, 09:39 PM
#40
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sleeperstyle
my old ls1 bone stock went ONE 13.8 @ 102mph, then 14's @ 101 or 100mph. i put a thermostat, fan switch, and a lid on it and it went 13.40's @ 104mph consistently.
so yes, they can be pretty slow in stock form,- especially in the 2.73 variety but like said the 215-225*coolant temps i think is the real killer.
so yes, they can be pretty slow in stock form,- especially in the 2.73 variety but like said the 215-225*coolant temps i think is the real killer.
"The Truth.. shall.. set.. you.. free!"