93 camaro z28 vs cobalt ss
#24
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
The GFs 96 A4 2.73 car lost to a Cobalt SS manual from a stoplight (close race) but murdered it from a roll a few seconds later. FWIW
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by burnzilla
Thats a cute story there.
50% of the time, its true every time.
FWIW, A Cobalt SS has a chance against a 2.73 A4 LT1, the slowest example of an LT1.
Now thats impressive.
Who/what does he race?
50% of the time, its true every time.
FWIW, A Cobalt SS has a chance against a 2.73 A4 LT1, the slowest example of an LT1.
Now thats impressive.
Who/what does he race?
#26
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 06cobaltSS
It's his 98 firebird vs. my 06 cobalt ss/sc. He has won everytime. Digs and rolls. both cars are stock.
Im not going to spend the time and effort trying to explain that what I meant had nothing to do with if an LS1/LT1 should put up just as much as a fight in stock form to a SS Cobalt, thats simply not true.
Everytime, the LS1 will eat the SS Cobalt.
Most of the time the LT1 will club it, with crappier runs making for a good race.
Originally Posted by ls1wannabe
you shouldn't be a dick its not like lt1's are the fastest thing ever.
Just like stock for stock the LS platform out works the LT platform.
I think being the Underdog is fun.
Last edited by burnzilla; 09-14-2006 at 10:48 PM.
#29
Launching!
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Orange Tx
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man I dont know but the race I seen was a saturn ion redline which I beleive is the same hp and motor as the cobalt ss raced a 175000 mile auto lt1 with a cut out and got drug bye about 5 cars from a 40 roll. I have witnesses to the race that post here maybe one will chime in. nothing againt the lil car but I dont thinkit will stand a chance against a lt1 i know the saturn didnt
#30
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just for reference i have $700 in mods to my car and of the 2 lt1's i raced one was a 95 stock auto very well mainted, and the other was a m6 95 camaro with full exhaust and a cai. The auto was just plain bad the m6 put up a better fight but from 50 to 110 i had 2.5 to 3 cars.
#31
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
i smoke my friends cobalt... torque and the cubes win everytime stock for stock
Your an idiot.. lets compare a modded car to a stock car... that is ******* stupid and yoru ricer *** should be ******* beat.
Stock vs Stock the LT1 romps the lit balt.... when mods begin... well it all depends then..
Originally Posted by ls1wannabe
maybe stock to stock but a modded balt is another story. you shouldn't be a dick its not like lt1's are the fastest thing ever.
Stock vs Stock the LT1 romps the lit balt.... when mods begin... well it all depends then..
#33
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dragframe
i smoke my friends cobalt... torque and the cubes win everytime stock for stock
Your an idiot.. lets compare a modded car to a stock car... that is ******* stupid and yoru ricer *** should be ******* beat.
Stock vs Stock the LT1 romps the lit balt.... when mods begin... well it all depends then..
Your an idiot.. lets compare a modded car to a stock car... that is ******* stupid and yoru ricer *** should be ******* beat.
Stock vs Stock the LT1 romps the lit balt.... when mods begin... well it all depends then..
****** tool
#34
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ls1wannabe
Just for reference i have $700 in mods to my car and of the 2 lt1's i raced one was a 95 stock auto very well mainted, and the other was a m6 95 camaro with full exhaust and a cai. The auto was just plain bad the m6 put up a better fight but from 50 to 110 i had 2.5 to 3 cars.
If you beat that M6 by 2 cars, that means you run near a mid 13.
So, 20K for the car.... $700 in mods. Low 13.
I have 1/4 of that into my Z28 including buying it.
I do however find it interesting that those little cars run so good. I don't know nothing about them, but I do know they handle boost pretty good.
LT1's handle heads and cams well too
With my bolt ons, a simple $1200 LE1 package will put my A4 to 350+ RWhp, so lets not go into this anymore than we have too.
#35
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Macomb
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very true i ran my bro's car for the hell of it, was not pretty ls1 h/c/i ouch i lost count after 2 or so buslengths. ON a side note yes these cars handle boost very well im running 22.5 pounds to be exact.
#36
I raced one with AEM intake, header/downpipe, and a Borla catback exhaust. I'm an A4 with stock 3.23's, CAI, headers, and an open cutout. From a dig it wasn't even close. By the end of 1st I had at least 1-1.5 lengths on him. After 2nd gear, it was quite a bit more than that. We also went from a 25-100 roll and when I shut down I had probably 3 lengths. So yeah, they're decent from a roll, but suck from a dig. Their supercharger sounds pretty sweet though!
Last edited by trixareforkids28; 09-14-2006 at 11:46 PM.
#38
Originally Posted by ls1wannabe
race him from 50 i know it sucks in the auto but it will be a even better race i promise.
#40
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cobalt ss...
is it the cobalt SS or CObalt SS S/C?
the S/C probly could beat you they run low 14s and trap 99-100 mph. anything other than a dig would probly be risky for you being pretty much stock performance wise. no offense but you drive an old LT1 and unless it was very well maintained your probly a 14 second ride yourself and mabe even slower in the 1/4 than the S/C cobalt
the S/C probly could beat you they run low 14s and trap 99-100 mph. anything other than a dig would probly be risky for you being pretty much stock performance wise. no offense but you drive an old LT1 and unless it was very well maintained your probly a 14 second ride yourself and mabe even slower in the 1/4 than the S/C cobalt