Whopped a Hemi RAM Daytona in my sick bogging 9C1!
#25
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shinerbock07
Ya?? Well why dont you do the research for me, thanks in advance!
Edit: Hince the name "Hemi" which derived from Mopar's Hemispherical heads..You gonna tell me the block is a revolutionary design too?and that how they make their power. The modern hemi is a marketing tool..
No response is needed, thanks!
Edit: Hince the name "Hemi" which derived from Mopar's Hemispherical heads..You gonna tell me the block is a revolutionary design too?and that how they make their power. The modern hemi is a marketing tool..
No response is needed, thanks!
if there's anything that gm could learn from dcx, it's how to package and market a product...
there's no doubt that the "hemi" name is a marketing tool.....calling it a "poly" doesn't have the same ring to it, nor the historical cache...but the actual design does take it's root in the 60's era mopar hemis.......wouldn't make much sense not updating half century old technology, and they did it and made a bad *** engine that is also emissions friendly......i can understand the resentment towards the pub it gets and the morons who buy into the "my truck is a race car" line, but the engine is wicked......if they ever get a clue and put it in something that weighs less than 4klbs you'll really have something that turns heads.....
this engine is more a "hemi" than the cobalt ss is a "super sport"
#26
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jdustu
if there's anything that gm could learn from dcx, it's how to package and market a product...
there's no doubt that the "hemi" name is a marketing tool.....calling it a "poly" doesn't have the same ring to it, nor the historical cache...but the actual design does take it's root in the 60's era mopar hemis.......wouldn't make much sense not updating half century old technology, and they did it and made a bad *** engine that is also emissions friendly......i can understand the resentment towards the pub it gets and the morons who buy into the "my truck is a race car" line, but the engine is wicked......if they ever get a clue and put it in something that weighs less than 4klbs you'll really have something that turns heads.....
this engine is more a "hemi" than the cobalt ss is a "super sport"
there's no doubt that the "hemi" name is a marketing tool.....calling it a "poly" doesn't have the same ring to it, nor the historical cache...but the actual design does take it's root in the 60's era mopar hemis.......wouldn't make much sense not updating half century old technology, and they did it and made a bad *** engine that is also emissions friendly......i can understand the resentment towards the pub it gets and the morons who buy into the "my truck is a race car" line, but the engine is wicked......if they ever get a clue and put it in something that weighs less than 4klbs you'll really have something that turns heads.....
this engine is more a "hemi" than the cobalt ss is a "super sport"
#30
Originally Posted by Shinerbock07
Ya?? Well why dont you do the research for me, thanks in advance!
Edit: Hince the name "Hemi" which derived from Mopar's Hemispherical heads..You gonna tell me the block is a revolutionary design too?and that how they make their power. The modern hemi is a marketing tool..
No response is needed, thanks!
Edit: Hince the name "Hemi" which derived from Mopar's Hemispherical heads..You gonna tell me the block is a revolutionary design too?and that how they make their power. The modern hemi is a marketing tool..
No response is needed, thanks!
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html
I will agree about the heads, but it also follows allot of other characteristics.
hemispherically-shaped combustion chambers, intake/exhaust port locations
And the motor put out equally as much power as their old motors did under their old ratings. Some company had an engine test sheet on the 426 hemi. So they compared that with the 6.1L and put out the same power but at much smaller cubes due to the technology.
Last edited by wickedwarlock; 10-10-2006 at 06:59 AM.
#31
Originally Posted by Shinerbock07
I think the 5.3 vortec would give a 5.7 "hemi" a run for its money...Stock for Stock.
Meaning 4x4 sc, sb versus 4x4 sc, sb, etc. I've seen it over and over the past 2 years. Now since they upped the horse power to 295 thanks to the nissan titan being introduced, possibly the outcome maybe slightly closer than previous. I haven't gone this year to say one way or the other but they were winning by 4-5 lengths when I was going in '04 and '05. I've seen countless stock silverado ss getting beat by 2wd stock 2wd quad cab hemis. Why do you think they put 6.0L in the 1500s?
#32
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
great dude you know more about trucks than I do, great u want a medal or something?
What are you gonna do next yell at the creator of this thread for beating one fo your almighty hemi's with a 300K miles 9C1 caprice?
Its people like you that come in here and try to be billy badass when someone is excited about a street kill and ruin it for everyone becuase you want to prove something about how much you know, great no one gives a **** or is impressed. I dont know much about this truck or anyother truck that is why i own a GENERAL MOTORS car and drive a TRANS AM. NOT A MOPAR TRUCK.
Why dont u quote this convo again, and then me and you can figure things out from here
You've made your point.
.
What are you gonna do next yell at the creator of this thread for beating one fo your almighty hemi's with a 300K miles 9C1 caprice?
Its people like you that come in here and try to be billy badass when someone is excited about a street kill and ruin it for everyone becuase you want to prove something about how much you know, great no one gives a **** or is impressed. I dont know much about this truck or anyother truck that is why i own a GENERAL MOTORS car and drive a TRANS AM. NOT A MOPAR TRUCK.
Why dont u quote this convo again, and then me and you can figure things out from here
You've made your point.
.
#33
Originally Posted by Shinerbock07
great dude you know more about trucks than I do, great u want a medal or something?
What are you gonna do next yell at the creator of this thread for beating one fo your almighty hemi's with a 300K miles 9C1 caprice?
Its people like you that come in here and try to be billy badass when someone is excited about a street kill and ruin it for everyone becuase you want to prove something about how much you know, great no one gives a **** or is impressed. I dont know much about this truck or anyother truck that is why i own a GENERAL MOTORS car and drive a TRANS AM. NOT A MOPAR TRUCK.
Why dont u quote this convo again, and then me and you can figure things out from here
You've made your point.
.
What are you gonna do next yell at the creator of this thread for beating one fo your almighty hemi's with a 300K miles 9C1 caprice?
Its people like you that come in here and try to be billy badass when someone is excited about a street kill and ruin it for everyone becuase you want to prove something about how much you know, great no one gives a **** or is impressed. I dont know much about this truck or anyother truck that is why i own a GENERAL MOTORS car and drive a TRANS AM. NOT A MOPAR TRUCK.
Why dont u quote this convo again, and then me and you can figure things out from here
You've made your point.
.
Hmmm, and let's go back to your posts. Yeap, they sure do contribute here too.