Originally Posted by ponygt65

And what if Ford made the 351 with an S/C..........

some people are so ignorant and stupid, it never seizes to amaze me.



can this thread die now?

Originally Posted by Azrael

Define "pieces of ****", with flawed design and old technology?

Just because they are Amercian? Because I can not think of another car that could do what either does even today. Shall we go into the recall history of the Honda Prelude? Or the fact that there are LT1 and LS1 cars in the 200k+ mile family? OHV old *** technology? Is that why they are LEV certified, drop more than 300 to the ground, and still get 26 mpg?

I am still trying to grasp how my intimidating looking, H/C bolt-on SS dropping more than 400 to the ground, and getting up to 26mpg with 80k on the clock; is more a POS than the Honda Civic I owned that ate its head gasket at 50k???

Originally Posted by TRMach1

Feel free to come laugh at me anytime.

Originally Posted by darrensls1

I all ready am and it has nothing to do with your car. This is your first post in this thread and no where did it congratulate the thread starter on a nice kill. You simply jumped in with a attempt (and a successful one) to start a fight and hijack a thread.

You want respect for your car but offered none to Import Slayer. Interesting.

Good kill Import Slayer! Stay safe out there

Originally Posted by 2K1WS6TA

I have to agree. And I laugh at you also.........see

Originally Posted by Irunelevens

WTF kinda ignorant *** **** is that? Camaro, Firebird, Mustang... ALL Pony cars. It doesn't matter how powerful you are, a Camaro/Firebird isn't a musclecar. ESPECIALLY if you're saying a Mustang GT isn't, and the F-body is. I guess if you're basing it on the F-body having a bigger engine, the '95 Cobra R beats the F-body, huh?

Edit: I'm basing this off the classic accepted definition of a "muscle car." ie; intermediate (midsize) body, LARGE V8 (350 ain't large), and of course performance oriented. There hasn't been a musclecar made since the mid 70s

Originally Posted by chaman

OMG....You did not just typed that.....Please educate yourself more before attempting to sound like you know ****. My guess is you think its a pony car because it has a horse in the badge, right?????

Originally Posted by Irunelevens

If you go by the classic definition, a ponycar can't be a muscle car. If I put a 502 in a Miata, does that make IT a musclecar? No... it's the wrong bodystyle. The new GTO is the closest thing there's been to a musclecar since the 70s, and some people still say it's not, because of the "small" engine. Oh, and how about this... what if you have a 10s GT? Is it a musclecar then?

Originally Posted by ws.6kid

This plaque in my garage states otherwise. Why would you even compare a Miata to a Fbody? BTW my dad has a 1968 GTO so don't start trying to tell me about GTOs buddy. The GTO was the first Muscle car fyi.

Originally Posted by ws.6kid

STFU, I NEVER said that camaros and trans ams weren't pony cars. The Mustang GT is just a pony car, not a musucle car PERIOD. Now Mach1s and Cobras are muscle cars. So go drive your bolt on TA or your Piece Of **** Dodge Magnum and think what you will.

Originally Posted by chaman

Guess you dont have much of an argument...and you still wrong. Guess dumbness is hard to cope with. Go read about automotive history and learn....