Lost to GTO :(
02-18-2007, 08:08 PM
#62
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slick1851
I know somone who went 13.0 in a 6.0 GTO......
People who say there slow are kinda retared, the same people also put down lt1s..
People who say there slow are kinda retared, the same people also put down lt1s..
02-18-2007, 08:30 PM
#64
Nice death.
I like the look of the GTO but this color looks like ***.
Black would look so much better.
BTW I think the WS6 and SS both look much better then the GTO.
Those tail lights look gay as F!ck.
I like the look of the GTO but this color looks like ***.
Black would look so much better.
BTW I think the WS6 and SS both look much better then the GTO.
Originally Posted by LittleMT
02-18-2007, 11:29 PM
#65
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It really does look like a bigger cavalier. I mean the engine is great, and the interior is nice or whatever. But F-Bodies just look so much better there is really no comparison.
02-18-2007, 11:50 PM
#67
Originally Posted by SmaknaSS
Nice death.
I like the look of the GTO but this color looks like ***.
Black would look so much better.
BTW I think the WS6 and SS both look much better then the GTO.
Those tail lights look gay as F!ck.
I like the look of the GTO but this color looks like ***.
Black would look so much better.
BTW I think the WS6 and SS both look much better then the GTO.
Those tail lights look gay as F!ck.
02-19-2007, 02:01 AM
#70
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow you all hijacked this thread so badly, lol. I have yet to run a GTO yet, so i cant give any input on the matter, but the numbers and times sound about right.
02-19-2007, 01:32 PM
#71
Originally Posted by BirdmanLS1
wow you all hijacked this thread so badly, lol. I have yet to run a GTO yet, so i cant give any input on the matter, but the numbers and times sound about right.
02-19-2007, 03:20 PM
#73
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTO JIMMY
Wow you are out of your mind, the GTO is an all around nicer car imo. Stock to stock it will not only outrun your beloved Fbodies in a straight line but it will do horrible things to them in the twisties! (My last ride was a low 12sec 99 Z28 for the record.) Interior is not even a contest, and yea if you prefer the looks of a catfish go with the camaro's. I cant really dog on the T/A's I have always liked how they looked.
sorry, but personally, i think a WS6 looks meaner than the GTO and IS what a muscle car should be. its funny..
how you resort to "in the twisties"
02-19-2007, 03:49 PM
#74
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On BananaHead's Decklid
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I owned my f-body I had a lot of people say it looked like a door wedge..profile view of course! Over the last couple of years the GTO's have grown on me a lot. I think Pontiac goofed up by releasing the Monaro under the GTO name plate here. If it was named something else it may have sold better but ths is all speculation and opinion.
02-19-2007, 04:03 PM
#76
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somewhere Between Mild Insanity and Complete Psychosis
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LittleMT
I likie very much how my chubby GTO looks...
02-19-2007, 04:34 PM
#77
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTO JIMMY
Now that is funny, I guess that makes you the all knowing and all powerful?
I could care less about this which looks better arguement because it is everyone's own opinion. Tell you the truth I didnt buy my car for the looks, I bought it cause it runs circles around most factory cars offered at the time. I wanted a brand new car for once and I made the right choice.
With 400hp and a sporty interior it would still be selling at msrp? Are you really that retarded? Just making sure you do realize that they DO have 400 hp and an interior that rivals that of your beloved pissed of UPS Truck. (Viper dummy)
Oh yea, dont forget the fact that my ugly *** australian car would do bad, bad things to your Viper.
I could care less about this which looks better arguement because it is everyone's own opinion. Tell you the truth I didnt buy my car for the looks, I bought it cause it runs circles around most factory cars offered at the time. I wanted a brand new car for once and I made the right choice.
With 400hp and a sporty interior it would still be selling at msrp? Are you really that retarded? Just making sure you do realize that they DO have 400 hp and an interior that rivals that of your beloved pissed of UPS Truck. (Viper dummy)
Oh yea, dont forget the fact that my ugly *** australian car would do bad, bad things to your Viper.
Ha ha ha...Your too funny...Your GTO rivals my viper hugh???LOL
LOL..
37K car that has 400 CRANK HP and 340 rwhp with a weight of 3750 pounds
VS
76K car that has 450 CRANK HP and 410 rwhp with a weight of 3380 pounds
BOTTOM line...
You do 0-60 in 4.8 vrs my 4.0
your car runs 13.3 at 109 in 90% of mags while my car runs 12.2 at 118 mph in 90% of mags...
real life...People have ran 12.6 at 112 bone stock in your car and 11.6 at 122 mph bone stock in my car...
While 400 crank HP may look similar to 450 CRANK HP on paper......340 rwhp vrs 410 rwhp and 3380 pounds vrs 3750 pounds means that stock for stock my viper was a solid second and 10 mph faster than yours...
WERE NOT EVEN IN THE SAME LEAGUE...LOL
as for doing bad things to my viper...LOL
My 428 rwhp and 473 rwt recently ran dead nuts with a H/C 408 firebird with all bolt ons putting down 470 rwhp...
The vids coming shortly...So if your high 400's or low 500's SAE in your now 3800 pound goat...Dont think your gonna pull a lightly modded viper so easily brother..LOL
BTW...wasnt that baby rear end of yours blown up with only around 500 rwhp and your POS is dead in the water...
My factory forged 99 can handle 800 rwhp on all the stock components including fuel sytem LOL...
LOL...Your soo funny man...I could go sell my old 99 for 45 grand right now and by two 05 GTO's...LOL....
But i can barely stand looking at one of them....
Now two WS6's or one WS6 and 1 SS camaro would probally require a little thinking on my part.
But your G.eeze T.hats O.bscene is a dissapointment to all LSX lovers out their...
3700-3800 pounds and cavalier styling...Why GM..Why
02-19-2007, 05:11 PM
#79
Originally Posted by Killemall
Ha ha ha...Your too funny...Your GTO rivals my viper hugh???LOL
LOL..
37K car that has 400 CRANK HP and 340 rwhp with a weight of 3750 pounds
VS
76K car that has 450 CRANK HP and 410 rwhp with a weight of 3380 pounds
BOTTOM line...
You do 0-60 in 4.8 vrs my 4.0
your car runs 13.3 at 109 in 90% of mags while my car runs 12.2 at 118 mph in 90% of mags...
real life...People have ran 12.6 at 112 bone stock in your car and 11.6 at 122 mph bone stock in my car...
While 400 crank HP may look similar to 450 CRANK HP on paper......340 rwhp vrs 410 rwhp and 3380 pounds vrs 3750 pounds means that stock for stock my viper was a solid second and 10 mph faster than yours...
WERE NOT EVEN IN THE SAME LEAGUE...LOL
as for doing bad things to my viper...LOL
My 428 rwhp and 473 rwt recently ran dead nuts with a H/C 408 firebird with all bolt ons putting down 470 rwhp...
The vids coming shortly...So if your high 400's or low 500's SAE in your now 3800 pound goat...Dont think your gonna pull a lightly modded viper so easily brother..LOL
BTW...wasnt that baby rear end of yours blown up with only around 500 rwhp and your POS is dead in the water...
My factory forged 99 can handle 800 rwhp on all the stock components including fuel sytem LOL...
LOL...Your soo funny man...I could go sell my old 99 for 45 grand right now and by two 05 GTO's...LOL....
But i can barely stand looking at one of them....
Now two WS6's or one WS6 and 1 SS camaro would probally require a little thinking on my part.
But your G.eeze T.hats O.bscene is a dissapointment to all LSX lovers out their...
3700-3800 pounds and cavalier styling...Why GM..Why
LOL..
37K car that has 400 CRANK HP and 340 rwhp with a weight of 3750 pounds
VS
76K car that has 450 CRANK HP and 410 rwhp with a weight of 3380 pounds
BOTTOM line...
You do 0-60 in 4.8 vrs my 4.0
your car runs 13.3 at 109 in 90% of mags while my car runs 12.2 at 118 mph in 90% of mags...
real life...People have ran 12.6 at 112 bone stock in your car and 11.6 at 122 mph bone stock in my car...
While 400 crank HP may look similar to 450 CRANK HP on paper......340 rwhp vrs 410 rwhp and 3380 pounds vrs 3750 pounds means that stock for stock my viper was a solid second and 10 mph faster than yours...
WERE NOT EVEN IN THE SAME LEAGUE...LOL
as for doing bad things to my viper...LOL
My 428 rwhp and 473 rwt recently ran dead nuts with a H/C 408 firebird with all bolt ons putting down 470 rwhp...
The vids coming shortly...So if your high 400's or low 500's SAE in your now 3800 pound goat...Dont think your gonna pull a lightly modded viper so easily brother..LOL
BTW...wasnt that baby rear end of yours blown up with only around 500 rwhp and your POS is dead in the water...
My factory forged 99 can handle 800 rwhp on all the stock components including fuel sytem LOL...
LOL...Your soo funny man...I could go sell my old 99 for 45 grand right now and by two 05 GTO's...LOL....
But i can barely stand looking at one of them....
Now two WS6's or one WS6 and 1 SS camaro would probally require a little thinking on my part.
But your G.eeze T.hats O.bscene is a dissapointment to all LSX lovers out their...
3700-3800 pounds and cavalier styling...Why GM..Why
Jesus christ man. Do you get butthurt this easily over everything?
Unit please lock this, I cant stand to see people bash other cars for no reason no matter what it is.
You would think..LOL... that you..LOL..with so much money..LOL...be able to..LOL...take some ******* spelling classes..LOL.