Neck and Neck with a 96 GT???
04-11-2007, 03:46 PM
#24
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by casper98gt
The PI swap wouldnt beable to run with you still if you have a 00 SS. They dyno in around 180-190 at the rear wheels belive me. I ran a best of 14.4 on simple mods im running a 13.8 right now with radials. With PI intake. Not so bad at least i can still run with the LT1's....stock.
04-11-2007, 03:48 PM
#25
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bumperdragging
this guy has a point, maybe because the LT1 is STOCK
04-11-2007, 05:23 PM
#27
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GM still should of had a reason to keep making camaros/T/A's. The 99 and 01 cobra's seemed to run pretty damn well to me. That's the only race I haven't won yet against an 01 cobra, we were neck and neck through the first 3 gears. He had atleast exhaust and I am stock, but put him up against a 2.73 auto ls1 and he wins.
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.
04-11-2007, 06:07 PM
#28
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=kyle91z28]GM still should of had a reason to keep making camaros/T/A's. The 99 and 01 cobra's seemed to run pretty damn well to me. That's the only race I haven't won yet against an 01 cobra, we were neck and neck through the first 3 gears. He had atleast exhaust and I am stock, but put him up against a 2.73 auto ls1 and he wins.
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.[/QUO
The 99 GT was "capable" of 13.8-14.0 in the 1/4 mile with a good launch and good driving. Which is enough to tangle with stock LT-1's and the slower badly driven LS1 cars. 99- 01 Cobra's with bolt ons run high 12's pretty easy if and only if you can drive around the lack of low end torque. (higher rpm launch). Mine really woke up with a C&L intake and MAF, Bassani LT's and X, underdrive pullies and a Borla race catback. Never lost to any F-body which is more an example of them not knowing there car as well as I knew mine.
On another note I still am a sucker for the LT-4 SS, never had a chance to run one but driving one put a perma grin on my face
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.[/QUO
The 99 GT was "capable" of 13.8-14.0 in the 1/4 mile with a good launch and good driving. Which is enough to tangle with stock LT-1's and the slower badly driven LS1 cars. 99- 01 Cobra's with bolt ons run high 12's pretty easy if and only if you can drive around the lack of low end torque. (higher rpm launch). Mine really woke up with a C&L intake and MAF, Bassani LT's and X, underdrive pullies and a Borla race catback. Never lost to any F-body which is more an example of them not knowing there car as well as I knew mine.
On another note I still am a sucker for the LT-4 SS, never had a chance to run one but driving one put a perma grin on my face
04-12-2007, 06:26 PM
#29
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=germeezy1]
I'm curious as to what my car would run at the track once I get some new tires. I haven't taken it to the track yet, but the 2 Ls1's that I have ran on the street I pulled both of them and I'm stock.
Originally Posted by kyle91z28
GM still should of had a reason to keep making camaros/T/A's. The 99 and 01 cobra's seemed to run pretty damn well to me. That's the only race I haven't won yet against an 01 cobra, we were neck and neck through the first 3 gears. He had atleast exhaust and I am stock, but put him up against a 2.73 auto ls1 and he wins.
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.[/QUO
The 99 GT was "capable" of 13.8-14.0 in the 1/4 mile with a good launch and good driving. Which is enough to tangle with stock LT-1's and the slower badly driven LS1 cars. 99- 01 Cobra's with bolt ons run high 12's pretty easy if and only if you can drive around the lack of low end torque. (higher rpm launch). Mine really woke up with a C&L intake and MAF, Bassani LT's and X, underdrive pullies and a Borla race catback. Never lost to any F-body which is more an example of them not knowing there car as well as I knew mine.
On another note I still am a sucker for the LT-4 SS, never had a chance to run one but driving one put a perma grin on my face
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.[/QUO
The 99 GT was "capable" of 13.8-14.0 in the 1/4 mile with a good launch and good driving. Which is enough to tangle with stock LT-1's and the slower badly driven LS1 cars. 99- 01 Cobra's with bolt ons run high 12's pretty easy if and only if you can drive around the lack of low end torque. (higher rpm launch). Mine really woke up with a C&L intake and MAF, Bassani LT's and X, underdrive pullies and a Borla race catback. Never lost to any F-body which is more an example of them not knowing there car as well as I knew mine.
On another note I still am a sucker for the LT-4 SS, never had a chance to run one but driving one put a perma grin on my face
I'm curious as to what my car would run at the track once I get some new tires. I haven't taken it to the track yet, but the 2 Ls1's that I have ran on the street I pulled both of them and I'm stock.
04-16-2007, 05:43 AM
#31
[QUOTE=germeezy1] Yeah the 99 and 01 Cobras aren't that bad. My best friend (he's Kingsnake99 on here) has a 99 Cobra with 4.10's, cams, ported tb, Ford racing clutch and flywheel, and his car is most definately not slow. A guy around here has a 99 or so GT that runs 13 flat in the 1/4 and Kingsnake99 took him by a few cars. The only real race he's lost so far is to a supercharged GTO.
Originally Posted by kyle91z28
GM still should of had a reason to keep making camaros/T/A's. The 99 and 01 cobra's seemed to run pretty damn well to me. That's the only race I haven't won yet against an 01 cobra, we were neck and neck through the first 3 gears. He had atleast exhaust and I am stock, but put him up against a 2.73 auto ls1 and he wins.
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.[/QUO
The 99 GT was "capable" of 13.8-14.0 in the 1/4 mile with a good launch and good driving. Which is enough to tangle with stock LT-1's and the slower badly driven LS1 cars. 99- 01 Cobra's with bolt ons run high 12's pretty easy if and only if you can drive around the lack of low end torque. (higher rpm launch). Mine really woke up with a C&L intake and MAF, Bassani LT's and X, underdrive pullies and a Borla race catback. Never lost to any F-body which is more an example of them not knowing there car as well as I knew mine.
On another note I still am a sucker for the LT-4 SS, never had a chance to run one but driving one put a perma grin on my face
99 and 01 cobras were no joke, but still no 03 cobra.[/QUO
The 99 GT was "capable" of 13.8-14.0 in the 1/4 mile with a good launch and good driving. Which is enough to tangle with stock LT-1's and the slower badly driven LS1 cars. 99- 01 Cobra's with bolt ons run high 12's pretty easy if and only if you can drive around the lack of low end torque. (higher rpm launch). Mine really woke up with a C&L intake and MAF, Bassani LT's and X, underdrive pullies and a Borla race catback. Never lost to any F-body which is more an example of them not knowing there car as well as I knew mine.
On another note I still am a sucker for the LT-4 SS, never had a chance to run one but driving one put a perma grin on my face
04-16-2007, 11:17 AM
#32
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine didn't have the low end of the Mach 1's but was a beast from a roll!
I was close to doing the next stage which would have been FI or 4.10's and FR500 cams/upper intake, but my dream girl came along!
I was close to doing the next stage which would have been FI or 4.10's and FR500 cams/upper intake, but my dream girl came along!
04-16-2007, 02:50 PM
#36
12 Second Club
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bumperdragging
if i owned a 96-97-98...stang that is, itd be a turbo'd windsor with spray..
If I owned a 96-97-98 Stang, I would use it as a urinal post for my dog.
04-16-2007, 02:53 PM
#37
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FoxNotch
I'm pretty sure no mustang was 2.73 geared after the foxes, 3.08s were base.
04-16-2007, 03:23 PM
#38
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pretyflywiteguy
no it wouldn't! he's got a freak LT1 that beats stock LS1's 
How in the hell is your car so clean? You must wax the thing every hour!
04-16-2007, 03:58 PM
#39
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlashLCD33
I don't think he has a whole lot to worry about. And a near 300rwhp stang with good gears, is still pretty much a joke.
04-16-2007, 04:04 PM
#40
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Traction is a great equalizer especially on the street, thats why I really hate racing from a dig
And RWHP means absolutely nothing unless you have a Supra. Just because you have XXX RWHP doesn't mean that you can automatically beat a car with XXX RWHP. Heck I would be scared of my Cobra with 4.10's and DR's off the line in my C5!
And RWHP means absolutely nothing unless you have a Supra. Just because you have XXX RWHP doesn't mean that you can automatically beat a car with XXX RWHP. Heck I would be scared of my Cobra with 4.10's and DR's off the line in my C5!