Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

srt4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #21  
slowmofo's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne, Florida
Default

Ibtl!! ^^ I Made It!!
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #22  
04Terminator's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 1
From: East Coast
Default

Dive.....IBTL....yes!
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #23  
BananaHead's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Lake Villa, IL
Default

Originally Posted by jimmy169
hey you can do the same with your chevy or pontiac but in the end it'll still be...u guessed it...a chevy, or pontiac...
That's one of their best selling points! Now, please, stop being a close-minded SRT4 fanboy. I like SRT4s, actually considered one for a DD, but the reality is that they are not THAT fast bone stock. Very high 13s if the owner can REALLY drive it. And, I'd be willing to bet that more than 1/2 of SRT owners can't REALLY drive em.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #24  
BananaHead's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Lake Villa, IL
Default

Oh...and IBTL!
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #25  
jimmy169's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BananaHead
That's one of their best selling points! Now, please, stop being a close-minded SRT4 fanboy. I like SRT4s, actually considered one for a DD, but the reality is that they are not THAT fast bone stock. Very high 13s if the owner can REALLY drive it. And, I'd be willing to bet that more than 1/2 of SRT owners can't REALLY drive em.
lol, close minded?? Speak for yourself domestic fanboy. The srt can have staged mods stock, warrantied stock, and the stage 1 or stage 2 srt-4 will be as fast if not faster than your precious fbody that really isn't THAT fast stock anyway (and nevermind the lt1's those get left in the dust, and the srt's look better but that's just imho). I'd be willing to bet you can't drive for **** either bananahead...man your reply is the funniest reply I've read yet, I'm just playing along so you could hopefully get a clue as to how dumb those statements of yours were....and I'm supposed to be the close-minded fanboy, lol.

Last edited by jimmy169; Apr 19, 2007 at 04:19 PM.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #26  
jimmy169's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Finite1
1. You're on an ls1 website, or did you forget that? classic fan-boy mentality on the wrong site.

2. I'm sure the history of Neon would dictate a huge enthusiast following that could compare to that of a pontiac firebird or a chevrolet camaro? no?

3. Would you drive a neon? no? but you'd drive an srt-4? It's a Neon. definately not for me though. They took a economy car and tossed a turbo on it, everything else is still economy neon. So sure it might be fast, but still a 4-door economy car with a turbo (even more economical). Unless I missed somthing. Since when were neon's anything other than cheap reliable transportation.

4. Probably more than 97% of new stock cars make less power and are slower than a stock ls1 in a straight line. 5 years after their last production model ls1 f-body. Go ahead and name some comparatively priced new cars that would be in the 30k range like an f-body would have been that would compare? What? EVO and............EVO... OH and used supras/3000gtvr4's, etc. haha.

********, I drive a peon, why would I care what I drive, are you that self conscious. There is a nice srt following for the few years it's been around, it's a great all around car not to mention a fast sports aspecially for the price, and it's funny your f-body was around 30k this little peon that the original poster is so worried about is around 20k new correct me if i'm wrong.


Man I really hate ignorant ****** that type in lists and numbers like they have a damn clue what their talking about. It's a 2.4l for starters, and they didn't just throw on a turbo, do u even know how a turbo setup works? I can't believe the crap some of u ppl are spitting out as though it's fact. And just to humor u, lets say u were right, and it's just a regular economy neon with a turbo on it, then don't u think that's pretty sad that it can keep up if not beat your fbody's for being just a regular ol' economy neon with a turbo thrown togather.

And the funny thing is I hope to own an ls1 one day, I'm waiting until the new camaro's come out since I figure that's when the fbody fans will wanna trade in their old one's for cheap...but I'm supposed to be the close-minded fanboy huh?
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #27  
jimmy169's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by darrensls1
IBTL

Run what ya brung and hope you brought enough. Only way to find out is to race and see what happens. Good luck in the race.

x2, I think the only reason why he care's so much beforehand if he'll def. win or not is because of how everyone's bashing on those cars as if they are nothing, if they're so bad then why is he even worried. I think it'd be a good race, with the neon having the upper edge, turbo applications love nitrous (if the piston ringlands can handle it) so I think the bottle is gonna yield em some good power. But don't worry about what other ppl think like these knuckleheads that wouldn't be cought dead driving in a neon because they must of had it real good all their live's, and enjoy this hobby for yourself, basically go race em and find out, and let us know how it went and i'm sure ppl will help you down a decent mod path to beat the neon next time if u do happen to lose.

edit: Sorry for the triple post!
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #28  
darrensls1's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 1
From: Sandwich, IL
Default

I'm certainly not calling you a fanboi or closed minded but I do have a few corrections to make.

Originally Posted by jimmy169
The srt can have staged mods stock, warrantied stock, and will be as fast if not faster than your precious fbody that really isn't THAT fast stock anyway
Our cars also came with a warranty when they were new and to my knowledge they were not voided by bolt-ons. Heads/cam/N20 is another story

Lets look at our "not that fast" F-bodies. The fastest stock time I ever heard of was 12.8 and it's considered normal for some older 2.73 geared autos to be closer to 13.8. That gives F-bodies a range of 12.8-13.8 in stock trim. The fastest stock SRT-4 I have ever heard of is 13.6 (which is as rare as a 12.8 F-body) and that can go as high as 14.6. So SRT-4s are 13.6-14.6 cars in stock trim.

Any way you slice it the F-body (on average) is a solid half second faster in the quarter mile then a SRT-4 in stock trim. You guys will average 14.0 and we average 13.5. So if LS1 F-bodies are "not that fast anyway" then SRT-4's are a half second slower then "not that fast anyway".

Originally Posted by jimmy169
(and nevermind the lt1's those get left in the dust, and the srt's look better but that's just imho).
The Irony here is that LT1's are also 13.6-14.6 stock trim cars. The general concensus is that the LT1 is a drivers race with a SRT-4 while the LS1 is one step ahead. Not being cocky here but just stating the facts.

SRT's being better looking is purely subjective but I have a feeling that opinion is in the minority. Not only here at LS1tech but also to the general public. Unless of course we were polling teenage girls across the country

I'm just kidding.

Or am I?
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #29  
95_formula's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Default

Originally Posted by unit213
Read the gosh damned rules please.
Rules are ment to be broken. This guy is just a reble without a cause.
Wa wa wa someone call the forum police because he broked the rules wa wa.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #30  
95_formula's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Default

Srt-4s sound like **** and look like ****. but I don't care about them they are 4cly **** boxes that I would never own so I will not talk about them ,they have nothing on any year f-body.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #31  
jimmy169's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by darrensls1
I'm certainly not calling you a fanboi or closed minded but I do have a few corrections to make.



Our cars also came with a warranty when they were new and to my knowledge they were not voided by bolt-ons. Heads/cam/N20 is another story

Lets look at our not that fast F-bodies. The fastest stock time I ever heard of was 12.8 and it's considered normal for some older 2.73 geared autos to be closer to 13.8. That gives F-bodies a range of 12.8-13.8 in stock trim. The fastest stock SRT-4 I have ever heard of is 13.6 (which is as rare as a 12.8 F-body) and that can go as high as 14.6. So they are 13.6-14.6 cars stock.

Any way you slice it the F-body (on average) is a solid half second faster in the quarter mile then a SRT-4 in stock trim. You guys will average 14.0 and we average 13.5. So if LS1 F-bodies are "not that fast anyway" then SRT-4's are a half second slower then "not that fast anyway".



The Irony here is that LT1's are also 13.6-14.6 stock trim cars. The general concensus is that the LT1 is a drivers race with a SRT-4 while the LS1 is one step ahead. Not being cocky here but just stating the facts.

SRT's being better looking is purely subjective but I have a feeling that opinion is in the minority not only here but in general. Unless of course we were polling teenage girls across the country

I'm just kidding.

Or an I?
Yeah I agree with a good driver, I've seen a 12.8 with those slp mods I think it was. The srt-4 compared to the lt1 I know is subjective and I was just playing along since everyone else was talking about looks (ricers, lol) but honestly, not that I have anything against the lt1's, but do you guys really prefer their looks over an srt-4? Many ppl that I've talked to can't stand the look of those cars, the ls1's though got it right, those look damn good, but something about those squared headlights of the lt1 just doesn't fit in with most of todays enthusiasts, just imho I know it's purely subjective, so think what you want.


I'm not sure what the general consensus is but like I said most srt's already have their staged mods from the factory, i mean in 04 it already came stock with lsd and stage 1, so the newer one's with their staged mods are one step above the first one's produced. I've never seen an srt have a hard time with the lt1's, with the ls1's i think the stage II srt-4's would be a good race, and I think you'd be surprised how well they can keep up if not take the win (i'm just talking about the warrantied mods you can choose to get for the car stock, not any other mods, u can easily mod an srt-4 for hardly any more money to beat an ls1, maybe a little raised boost will do it).

Also lastly (heh, this is funny cause I don't even own an srt-4, i just like to keep an open mind and keep a look out at the dif. cars at the track) the srt-4's all seem to run under 14's, i've never seen one run over 14's unless it had a horrible 60ft, maybe the first year srt-4's without their lsd may have been close to 14's but even then I remember ppl clicking off time's in the 13's pretty commonly. IMO it seems stock newer srt-4's will go high 13's usually, stage 1 will go mid 13's, and stage II will go low 13's, really tough for them to dip into the 12's imo being fwd.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #32  
darrensls1's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 1
From: Sandwich, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 95_formula
Rules are ment to be broken. This guy is just a reble without a cause.
Wa wa wa someone call the forum police because he broked the rules wa wa.
You have 14 posts to your username and you're making fun of a moderator for pointing out the rules.

Are you trying to get banned or are you a rebel without a cause?
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #33  
jimmy169's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 95_formula
Rules are ment to be broken. This guy is just a reble without a cause.
Wa wa wa someone call the forum police because he broked the rules wa wa.

I believe unit is a mod here, just a heads up I'd show a little more respect.

Originally Posted by 95_formula
Srt-4s sound like **** and look like ****. but I don't care about them they are 4cly **** boxes that I would never own so I will not talk about them ,they have nothing on any year f-body.
Here's a secret, your lt1 looks like **** and has nothing for the srt-4, your 500lb's heavier with close to the same whp.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #34  
Finite1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by jimmy169
********, I drive a peon, why would I care what I drive, are you that self conscious. There is a nice srt following for the few years it's been around, it's a great all around car not to mention a fast sports aspecially for the price, and it's funny your f-body was around 30k this little peon that the original poster is so worried about is around 20k new correct me if i'm wrong.


Man I really hate ignorant ****** that type in lists and numbers like they have a damn clue what their talking about. It's a 2.4l for starters, and they didn't just throw on a turbo, do u even know how a turbo setup works? I can't believe the crap some of u ppl are spitting out as though it's fact. And just to humor u, lets say u were right, and it's just a regular economy neon with a turbo on it, then don't u think that's pretty sad that it can keep up if not beat your fbody's for being just a regular ol' economy neon with a turbo thrown togather.

And the funny thing is I hope to own an ls1 one day, I'm waiting until the new camaro's come out since I figure that's when the fbody fans will wanna trade in their old one's for cheap...but I'm supposed to be the close-minded fanboy huh?

hahaha @ not owning an ls1. Wow. As predicted.

I've been in both cars. the interior/exterior is the same mostly outside of wheels/spoiler/hood. The engine is definately built to perform, but it's barely comparable to a stock ls1 f-body in their own right. NO, sorry I dont know the specs of the individual engines. But I've seen bolt-on turbo kits and 4-cylinder engines. They just did more engineering (READ: SRT) but PLEASE humor US and tell us what they did special in those engines that make them a stand-out.

Hopefully one day you get to own one, so you can actually appreciate the car instead of posting generalized information. (READ: your original post)

Didn't they discontinue the SRT-4 Neon for 08"??? Must be a reason they redesigning it. 260ft lbs of torque? I think the Caliber still wouldn't be for me.

Good luck on that ls1. Hopefully you can get out of that neon one day.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #35  
95_formula's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Default

so they put 300hp 325trq to the ground and weight 2700 pounds?
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #36  
six_string_wiz's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Chandler,AZ
Default

Originally Posted by jimmy169
lol, close minded?? Speak for yourself domestic fanboy. The srt can have staged mods stock, warrantied stock, and the stage 1 or stage 2 srt-4 will be as fast if not faster than your precious fbody that really isn't THAT fast stock anyway (and nevermind the lt1's those get left in the dust, and the srt's look better but that's just imho). I'd be willing to bet you can't drive for **** either bananahead...man your reply is the funniest reply I've read yet, I'm just playing along so you could hopefully get a clue as to how dumb those statements of yours were....and I'm supposed to be the close-minded fanboy, lol.
This here blows my mind.Are there really people thinking this way?The LS1 uses some of the most basic boltons, that make modding the car a snap.Not to mention, adding the next level components,that makes these cars sub 12.5 car
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #37  
darrensls1's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 1
From: Sandwich, IL
Default

Originally Posted by jimmy169
Also lastly (heh, this is funny cause I don't even own an srt-4, i just like to keep an open mind and keep a look out at the dif. cars at the track) the srt-4's all seem to run under 14's, i've never seen one run over 14's unless it had a horrible 60ft, maybe the first year srt-4's without their lsd may have been close to 14's but even then I remember ppl clicking off time's in the 13's pretty commonly. IMO it seems stock newer srt-4's will go high 13's usually, stage 1 will go mid 13's, and stage II will go low 13's, really tough for them to dip into the 12's imo being fwd.
FWD and street tires are reasons #1 and #2 for why I have never seen a stock SRT-4 hit better then a 14.0 at my track. I obviously don't own one either but I have been a long time member at srtforums.com so I know the 411 on these things stock or modded. Or at least I used to because I stopped hanging out there when warstories was removed.

Now granted the cars I see run are not stage 2 cars but as far as I know in 03 and 04 the SRT-4 didn't come from the factory with stage 2 or 3. People would buy the kits from aftermarket vendors. Not sure about 05 but from your remarks it sounds like Dodge offered stage 2 as a factory option.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #38  
edwardswb's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

I raped a stage 3 neon from a dig. Just go race him. Those cars are fun to drive though. The shifter feels sloppy like a Mack Truck, but running them through the twisties is actually a pretty good time. I'll give the little neon that could some credit for being a sweet all around car. I'd use one as a daily driver. Now go ahead boys, start flaming.
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #39  
six_string_wiz's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Chandler,AZ
Default

Wasnt the SRT4s engine the same platform as the Breeze or Stratus?"The family car"
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #40  
jimmy169's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Finite1
hahaha @ not owning an ls1. Wow. As predicted.

I've been in both cars. the interior/exterior is the same mostly outside of wheels/spoiler/hood. The engine is definately built to perform, but it's barely comparable to a stock ls1 f-body in their own right. NO, sorry I dont know the specs of the individual engines. But I've seen bolt-on turbo kits and 4-cylinder engines. They just did more engineering (READ: SRT) but PLEASE humor US and tell us what they did special in those engines that make them a stand-out.

Hopefully one day you get to own one, so you can actually appreciate the car instead of posting generalized information. (READ: your original post)

Didn't they discontinue the SRT-4 Neon for 08"??? Must be a reason they redesigning it. 260ft lbs of torque? I think the Caliber still wouldn't be for me.

Good luck on that ls1. Hopefully you can get out of that neon one day.

lmao, you crack me up. I got my little peon because I decided to get out of this hobby and save for something more important. I used to have a dsm and I know how ppl can get carried away with this hobby, so I choose to buy a simple economical car until I save enough money to feel comfortable with, hopefully enough to have a good down payment on a house when the time is right, and then when I'm comfortable I'll gladly jump back into this hobby and get a nice fun sports car, but thanks for your concern though. And didn't they discontinue the camaro in 02?? Can't believe I'm replying to this crap...

And by the way it's funny how your comparing a 30k car's interior and performance to a 20k car, and the original poster is worried about loosing a race to one, pretty impressive for the price huh?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.