this is how sad mustangs are!
04-27-2007, 06:22 PM
#81
[QUOTE=Irunelevens] wow......this thread is really entertaining! thanks to all the 'stang guys for keeping my attention for the last 10 minutes. (respect to all the cobras btw)
As for f-bodies not being musclecars......what are you smoking? I believe the '67 - '69 SS, Z28, RS/SS, etc...are considered muscle cars by almost everyone
........and they're f-bodies too!
Originally Posted by lswon!!
And no, the Mustang is not a musclecar. And neither is the F-body.
As for f-bodies not being musclecars......what are you smoking? I believe the '67 - '69 SS, Z28, RS/SS, etc...are considered muscle cars by almost everyone
........and they're f-bodies too! 
04-27-2007, 06:31 PM
#82
Administrator
[QUOTE=lswon!!]
then what the hell are they? most 2 door v8 rwd cars are considered muscle cars or "performance cars" They are pony cars. Muscle cars, at least the true meaning, refers
to big *** family sized 4 door tanks with huge CID powerplants. Performance
car is a good description. Sports cars have two seats.
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
then what the hell are they? most 2 door v8 rwd cars are considered muscle cars or "performance cars"
to big *** family sized 4 door tanks with huge CID powerplants. Performance
car is a good description. Sports cars have two seats.
04-27-2007, 06:44 PM
#85
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depends... the Nova/F-body weren't in the "musclecar" class officially, but the Chevelle was. As was the Buick GS, and the big Mopars. Performance does not necessarily dictate whether something is a sports/muscle/pony/econo-car. I could convert a Cobalt to RWD and put a 502 in there, and it still wouldn't be a "musclecar." Just like no matter what you do, a Mustang/F-body will not be a "sportscar." It's all semantics, to tell you the truth. But it's still a widely-recognized way of identifying and classifying cars. They have to meet certain criteria.
04-27-2007, 06:52 PM
#86
MOTOR TREND strikes again!! ^
K, well sorry I didn't take Muscles on Cars 101 in school, and my terminology was misconcepted, along with my false notation of previous mentioned automobiles.
You know I hear the Speed channel needs a new voice over on the Muscle Car series! Iron out some things, because all the cars I mentioned have been on the show, along with auctions, stating them as muscle cars. But I must be in the "muscle car" minority!
Good Day!
K, well sorry I didn't take Muscles on Cars 101 in school, and my terminology was misconcepted, along with my false notation of previous mentioned automobiles.
You know I hear the Speed channel needs a new voice over on the Muscle Car series! Iron out some things, because all the cars I mentioned have been on the show, along with auctions, stating them as muscle cars. But I must be in the "muscle car" minority!
Good Day!
04-27-2007, 06:55 PM
#87
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by '02 Double U S-6
MOTOR TREND strikes again!! ^
K, well sorry I didn't take Muscles on Cars 101 in school, and my terminology was misconcepted, along with my false notation of previous mentioned automobiles.
You know I hear the Speed channel needs a new voice over on the Muscle Car series! Iron out some things, because all the cars I mentioned have been on the show, along with auctions, stating them as muscle cars. But I must be in the "muscle car" minority!
Good Day!
K, well sorry I didn't take Muscles on Cars 101 in school, and my terminology was misconcepted, along with my false notation of previous mentioned automobiles.
You know I hear the Speed channel needs a new voice over on the Muscle Car series! Iron out some things, because all the cars I mentioned have been on the show, along with auctions, stating them as muscle cars. But I must be in the "muscle car" minority!
Good Day!
And I don't know where you get this "Motor Trend" crap from 
.
04-27-2007, 06:58 PM
#88
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you know I'm not making this **** up... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
Originally Posted by That page
The term muscle car generally describes a rear wheel drive mid-size car with a large, powerful engine (typically, although not universally, a V8 engine) and special trim, intended for maximum torque on the street or in drag racing competition. It is distinguished from sports cars, which were customarily and coincidentally considered smaller, two-seat cars, or GTs, two-seat or 2+2 cars intended for high-speed touring and possibly road racing. High-performance full-size or compact cars are arguably excluded from this category, as are the breed of compact sports coupes inspired by the Ford Mustang, the "pony car".
04-27-2007, 07:01 PM
#89
Well you seem to have all of your automobile knowlege like it came straight from the damn magazine. I've seen all your posts and it's nothing but contradictory crap, and basically all on the street racing thread.
Contribute someting to the board (by means of other threads), quit lurking on here waiting to correct someone when they state a wrong hp number, tail lights on yr. model, front fascia on certain years, and 1/4 times, or when by some miraculous way, an LS1 overcame a GT.
Go back to the 'Stang forums, and banter there.
K well my arguing side of this is done.
Contribute someting to the board (by means of other threads), quit lurking on here waiting to correct someone when they state a wrong hp number, tail lights on yr. model, front fascia on certain years, and 1/4 times, or when by some miraculous way, an LS1 overcame a GT.
Go back to the 'Stang forums, and banter there.
K well my arguing side of this is done.
04-27-2007, 07:05 PM
#92
Originally Posted by BigBronco
You are a complete tool.
04-27-2007, 07:05 PM
#93
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by '02 Double U S-6
Well you seem to have all of your automobile knowlege like it came straight from the damn magazine. I've seen all your posts and it's nothing but contradictory crap, and basically all on the street racing thread.
Contribute someting to the board (by means of other threads), quit lurking on here waiting to correct someone when they state a wrong hp number, tail lights on yr. model, front fascia on certain years, and 1/4 times, or when by some miraculous way, an LS1 overcame a GT.
Go back to the 'Stang forums, and banter there.
K well my arguing side of this is done.
Contribute someting to the board (by means of other threads), quit lurking on here waiting to correct someone when they state a wrong hp number, tail lights on yr. model, front fascia on certain years, and 1/4 times, or when by some miraculous way, an LS1 overcame a GT.
Go back to the 'Stang forums, and banter there.
K well my arguing side of this is done.
04-27-2007, 07:07 PM
#96
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Get off my nuts, man. Don't be jealous because I good general knowledge about alot of cars. I correct mis-information when I see it, and contribute to other parts of the forum when it's something I actually have specific knowledge of. I don't know which cam will work best with a set of AFR205 heads on an LS2 or something like that, so I stay out of the tech sections for the most part. And you're talking like you have 5,000 posts or something. You don't even have 200
04-27-2007, 07:09 PM
#97
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sugarland, TX
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by '02 Double U S-6
MOTOR TREND strikes again!! ^
K, well sorry I didn't take Muscles on Cars 101 in school, and my terminology was misconcepted, along with my false notation of previous mentioned automobiles.
You know I hear the Speed channel needs a new voice over on the Muscle Car series! Iron out some things, because all the cars I mentioned have been on the show, along with auctions, stating them as muscle cars. But I must be in the "muscle car" minority!
Good Day!
K, well sorry I didn't take Muscles on Cars 101 in school, and my terminology was misconcepted, along with my false notation of previous mentioned automobiles.
You know I hear the Speed channel needs a new voice over on the Muscle Car series! Iron out some things, because all the cars I mentioned have been on the show, along with auctions, stating them as muscle cars. But I must be in the "muscle car" minority!
Good Day!
04-27-2007, 07:11 PM
#100
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sugarland, TX
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
