Raced a New Mustang with Roush blower
#201
Administrator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by will82
ANY of you Ford guys want to respond to this???
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
Originally Posted by will82
I'm interested to hear how you defend a setup that uses more space/weight/moving parts for less displacement & power.
I've said it a million times and I'll say it again, the LSx platform is
incredible in terms of potential and simplicity. The DOHC 4.6 4V motor
is very stout and respectable in it's own right. In the case of the '03
Cobra motor, Ford chose to use a low compression, small CID motor
(with a bullshit blower on it) to make power. GM uses big naturally
aspirated BIG CID motors with high compression to make power. Is
that really hard to comprehend?
How much power are you making with that P1? I would certainly hope
in the 7xxx rwhp range.
Keep in mind that both the 4.6 4V and the LSx motors are nothing in the
world of drag racing. I'm talking real racing, not this 10 second car stuff.
It unfortunately but true...they just aren't competitive at the highest
level.
#202
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somewhere Between Mild Insanity and Complete Psychosis
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by unit213
In the case of the '03
Cobra motor, Ford chose to use a low compression, small CID motor
(with a bullshit blower on it) to make power. GM uses big naturally
aspirated BIG CID motors with high compression to make power. Is
that really hard to comprehend?
Cobra motor, Ford chose to use a low compression, small CID motor
(with a bullshit blower on it) to make power. GM uses big naturally
aspirated BIG CID motors with high compression to make power. Is
that really hard to comprehend?
Originally Posted by unit213
How much power are you making with that P1? I would certainly hope in the 7xxx rwhp range.
Last edited by will82; 05-28-2007 at 01:54 PM.
#203
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somewhere Between Mild Insanity and Complete Psychosis
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I'm a Ford guy....perhaps you missed my response? Here's another.
![Bang Head](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_banghead.gif)
The Ford motors advatage in strength to withstand boost has nothing to do with the engine design, it's just simply a matter of using the correct pistons, rods, rod bolts, etc. If they would use the same quality components, but in an engine similar in style to the LS1, it would be a real winner. And vise versa, if GM would build an LSX motor, but with the same quality internals as the Mod motor in the Ford Cobra, GT500, and GT, then they too would have a knock-out engine to offer. Leave it to American manufacturers to shoot themselves in the foot with stupidity. Making the change would save Ford $$$, and using better Pistons would only cost GM a fraction of the $500-$600 it costs us to buy them because of sheer quantity.
#204
Teching In
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bay Minette, Alabama
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The ls motor is not slightly better than the 03-04 cobra motor. As far as dependability goes they might be tit for tat but stock for stock the cobra engine makes more power and under modified conditions can handle a lot more hp for a lot longer than the ls motor. I completely agree that the ls motor is better than the 2v 4.6 in stock terms but not the cobra motor by no means. As far as how complicated a motor is, well, that's personal opinion. I've built 4.6 engines and think that there is nothing complicated at all about them. I've never built a ls engine nor seen one tore down. I've just heard that they are a bitch to work on and very expensive. A lot of ls guys would say the same about the 4.6.
#205
Administrator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by will82
Again, my point is that the GM engine is not BIG, compared to the DOHC 4.6L 4V motor Ford uses.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
That's pretty much irrelevant to me. I'm talking about CID...you know...
cubic inches? That last time I checked, the external size of a motor doesn't
make power.
I won't waste my time replying to the remainder or your post. Arguing
this is pointless. There is nothing that you can tell me about the LS1
platform that I don't already know. But feel free to defend it. I'm not
sure why you would since I'm a big fan of them.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
#206
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by unit213
Are you actually comparing the external dimensions of each motor? ![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
That's pretty much irrelevant to me. I'm talking about CID...you know...
cubic inches? That last time I checked, the external size of a motor doesn't
make power.
I won't waste my time replying to the remainder or your post. Arguing
this is pointless. There is nothing that you can tell me about the LS1
platform that I don't already know. But feel free to defend it. I'm not
sure why you would since I'm a big fan of them.![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
That's pretty much irrelevant to me. I'm talking about CID...you know...
cubic inches? That last time I checked, the external size of a motor doesn't
make power.
I won't waste my time replying to the remainder or your post. Arguing
this is pointless. There is nothing that you can tell me about the LS1
platform that I don't already know. But feel free to defend it. I'm not
sure why you would since I'm a big fan of them.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
No, ofcourse not. This is using hyperbole to get across his point. The LS1 is impressive because of the power it can make while being a relatively small block and very light weight. It's displacement of 5.7 Liters is always an argument used against the LS1 in terms of how it compares to other engines, which is extreme bull **** considering that it is an achievement to fit that 5.7 L in such a small lightweight package.
#207
9 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Braunfels ,Tx
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Originally Posted by unit213
Are you actually comparing the external dimensions of each motor? ![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
That's pretty much irrelevant to me. I'm talking about CID...you know...
cubic inches? That last time I checked, the external size of a motor doesn't
make power.
I won't waste my time replying to the remainder or your post. Arguing
this is pointless. There is nothing that you can tell me about the LS1
platform that I don't already know. But feel free to defend it. I'm not
sure why you would since I'm a big fan of them.![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
That's pretty much irrelevant to me. I'm talking about CID...you know...
cubic inches? That last time I checked, the external size of a motor doesn't
make power.
I won't waste my time replying to the remainder or your post. Arguing
this is pointless. There is nothing that you can tell me about the LS1
platform that I don't already know. But feel free to defend it. I'm not
sure why you would since I'm a big fan of them.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
#208
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
GUYS Y ARE WE ARGUING ABOUT BOTH PLATFORMS THIS THREAD WAS ABOUT A RACE BETWEEN MY CAMARO AND A SUPERCHARGED MUSTANG. BOTH THE LSX AND COBRA MOTORS HAVE THERE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES AND I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU COULD SAY AN LSX MOTOR IS HARD TO WORK ON I THINK ITS EASIER THAN AN OLD SCHOOL MOTOR, BUT THAT DOESN'T MATTER. AGAIN COMPARING AN LSX AND COBRA MOTOR IS NOT COMPARING APPLES TO APPLES JUST TO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS IN EACH ON THEY ARE BOTH GOOD MOTORS AND IF I HAD THE MONEY MY NEXT CAR WOULD BE AN 03-04 COBRA JUST CUS I WANT ONE AND I WOULD STILL KEEP THE CAMARO.
I used caps cus nobody seems to understand this thread it was just supposed to be about a race and you die hard FORD or die hard CHEVY fans need to be more open minded hell I love my ls1 camaro but I'd love to have an 03-04 cobra or a GT500 but I'm just an all around car freak (except imports). But this is quite an interesting thread
I used caps cus nobody seems to understand this thread it was just supposed to be about a race and you die hard FORD or die hard CHEVY fans need to be more open minded hell I love my ls1 camaro but I'd love to have an 03-04 cobra or a GT500 but I'm just an all around car freak (except imports). But this is quite an interesting thread
#209
Administrator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JMBLOWNWS6
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Im sure I know something you dont know
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
I'm fully aware of the LSx potential. I don't need the lesson that
people feel compelled to give me.
...and I was right...it's wise *** apparently ya bastard.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
#210
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Agreed. Not sure what the relevance is to this discussion, but I agree with your statement none-the-less.
Both of the above were made on the same DynoJet 248 at Abacus Racing in Va Beach.
BTW...my cut on the LSx vs Mod Motor, posted some time back on the Corral. But that is not to say that a Modular can't compete....even in N/A form.
Bob
Both of the above were made on the same DynoJet 248 at Abacus Racing in Va Beach.
BTW...my cut on the LSx vs Mod Motor, posted some time back on the Corral. But that is not to say that a Modular can't compete....even in N/A form.
Bob
#211
Administrator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Louie83
It's displacement of 5.7 Liters is always an argument used against the LS1 in terms of how it compares to other engines, which is extreme bull **** considering that it is an achievement to fit that 5.7 L in such a small lightweight package.
I figured I'd bold everything as well since you did.
Holy Christ...I need to buy another LS1 so you ******* will quit nit
picking every god damned word I say.
![Nono](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/nono.gif)
...I'm sick of this crap.
![Locked ...](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/lockd.gif)