another 46 bites the dust
#101
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
although as some figures ive seen come out to about 75 dollars saved per car(HUGE amount in ford's case). the smartest answer on why ford switched from the old TRW slugs was due to both cost and increased emissions. haha its another reason why an x3z computer isnt too great and why 93 cobras were quite underrated and had alot to gain w/ just a tune.
#102
TECH Resident
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 88blackgt
just though i would help you guys out w/ a little fox history. 85 was the first year for forged pistons, 86 was the first year for the 8.8. 87 was the first year for EFI(SD) and MAF came in 89(88 for cali cars). also hyper pistons came about due to increasing emissions standards(cost probably had some to do with it too). hyper pistons have less thermal expansion.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Bob
#103
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 88blackgt
haha in that case you need to do a little more reading on the subject, as the switch to hyperpathetic pistons was a common thread among auto manufacturers as emissions regulations increased. the major advantage is in the clearances for the motor. tighter piston to wall clearances allowed for less blowby and lower cold-start emissions(hardest test to pass). not to mention the reduced blowby keeps the o2s alive longer and the emissions system happy. hyper pistons also reduce scuffing ![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
#104
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
One minor point of clarification....86 was the first year for EFI. 87 changed to E7 heads and got a corresponding 25 hp boost. ![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Bob
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Bob
thanks bob
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#105
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by speedshifterNC
Termi, since you're the only one worth talking to: I should have included the 3v's b/c that's the "new" block I was refering to and I hear they won't hold more than 500rwhp. Your block on the other hand is rock solid. I have a friend with one that's atleast a 10 sec. car with way more than 600 horses. I knew the location bit was coming so we can meet at Mooresville's 1/8 mile. It will have to be next week however as I'm out of money(hope you wanna run for fun). You have a better chance of running who you want to down there.
![Smokin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/smokin.gif)
By the way, I posted a kill of an SS that runs 10.0s on motor in the 1/4 with my Cobra. My 85 GT is faster in the 1/4...so we'll drop the **** measuring crap.
You might want to check on the ford 3V blocks...they hold more than 500HP. Look around and you'll find the dyno numbers for my S281E.
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)