2V mustangs HA!
09-11-2007, 05:12 AM
#61
Originally Posted by The Black Mamba
I guess from now on I'll have to start using /sarcasm on...
With internet forums these days........I just wasnt too sure. Then every idiot will call a cam a bolt on and then we are back to 900,000 useless posts of "Bolt on LSX this....." I thought so though, thats why I had the smiley.
09-11-2007, 07:33 AM
#62
Originally Posted by sprayjunkie
LOL, still needs a driver...last two 2valves I raced were both blown.
Ran both from a dig, me on street tires, killed them both. (No spray, all motor)
Are you aware that most out of the box blower kits for the 2 valves dont even make 400rwhp?
****...400rwhp is practically bolt-on power in this crowd.
You are playing with the big boys...get your facts straight.
Ran both from a dig, me on street tires, killed them both. (No spray, all motor)
Are you aware that most out of the box blower kits for the 2 valves dont even make 400rwhp?
****...400rwhp is practically bolt-on power in this crowd.
You are playing with the big boys...get your facts straight.
400 rwhp = big boys... I-net testosterone. Can we get a smiley of Arnold flexing his biceps?
09-11-2007, 08:39 AM
#63
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Most stock or close to stock LT1's I've come across couldn't get out of the 14's.
09-11-2007, 09:47 AM
#64
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sidewayz28
so what WAS the best year for a GT mustang? fox bodies?
09-11-2007, 01:05 PM
#65
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 93transam
Please LS1 owners do not gloat about a kill on a stock or even close to stock SOHC Mustang.
YES we do know that in fact a stock 93-2002 F-body CAN beat a ******* stock or almost stock SOHC Stang.
And YES we know Mustang owners that those of you have modified the **** out of your car will smack down all the stock or close to stock F-bodies.
And YES we ******* know a Mach 1 and LS1 is a drivers race with edge to the LS1
And NO Ford is not cheating with a ****** supercharger and neither is GM with more cubic inches
I swear the Mustang, F-Body war is the longest ******* pissing contest known to man.
YES we do know that in fact a stock 93-2002 F-body CAN beat a ******* stock or almost stock SOHC Stang.
And YES we know Mustang owners that those of you have modified the **** out of your car will smack down all the stock or close to stock F-bodies.
And YES we ******* know a Mach 1 and LS1 is a drivers race with edge to the LS1
And NO Ford is not cheating with a ****** supercharger and neither is GM with more cubic inches
I swear the Mustang, F-Body war is the longest ******* pissing contest known to man.
09-11-2007, 02:29 PM
#68
Launching!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: auburn, california
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
And the majority of Camaros and Firebirds are also slow. Again...whats your f*ing point? The base models are 6 cylinders. Then the Camaro and Firebird have the Z28 and T/A (Formula) which are a step up. Mustangs have the GT. Then it goes to SS and Firehawks which are no faster. The Mustangs have the Cobra and GT500 which no stock F-body can compete with. Also the Mustangs have the Mach1. Dude you are fighting a losing battle there. I'd take your little LT1 and go look for some SOHC GT's and keep imagining you are the man. 
hmmm i wonder what i could do with allllllll that extra money i saved on my LS1 
09-11-2007, 02:56 PM
#70
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by supersickss
hmmm i wonder what i could do with allllllll that extra money i saved on my LS1
/ricer comment
09-11-2007, 03:12 PM
#71
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by supersickss
hmmm i wonder what i could do with allllllll that extra money i saved on my LS1
09-11-2007, 03:20 PM
#73
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And another Ford/GM threads goes to the wind... 
this is getting interesting Thats a clean LT1 you got there.
13.2 @ 106 is damn good rowing! And a damn good time for just headers/intake/catback.
Congrats on that time man, did you even use the clutch?
Originally Posted by 1994Z28Lt1
this is getting interesting13.2 @ 106 is damn good rowing! And a damn good time for just headers/intake/catback.
Congrats on that time man, did you even use the clutch?
09-11-2007, 05:12 PM
#74
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
who the F*ck's talkin about 99-04 gt's. Clearly written in my post 96 GT, so I'm not sure Dynotune04 what you are talking about, Also My car is pretty fast, If you live in Mass. Area I would love to prove it to you.
09-11-2007, 05:25 PM
#76
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the majority of Camaros and Firebirds are also slow. Again...whats your f*ing point? The base models are 6 cylinders. Then the Camaro and Firebird have the Z28 and T/A (Formula) which are a step up. Mustangs have the GT. Then it goes to SS and Firehawks which are no faster. The Mustangs have the Cobra and GT500 which no stock F-body can compete with. Also the Mustangs have the Mach1. Dude you are fighting a losing battle there. I'd take your little LT1 and go look for some SOHC GT's and keep imagining you are the man.
Cobra's and Gt500's are substantially more expensive, and yes I'm sure they could beat my $6k formula. Come stopsign let's not compare apples to pumpkins
Cobra's and Gt500's are substantially more expensive, and yes I'm sure they could beat my $6k formula. Come stopsign let's not compare apples to pumpkins
09-11-2007, 05:28 PM
#78
Originally Posted by phirepower
And the majority of Camaros and Firebirds are also slow. Again...whats your f*ing point? The base models are 6 cylinders. Then the Camaro and Firebird have the Z28 and T/A (Formula) which are a step up. Mustangs have the GT. Then it goes to SS and Firehawks which are no faster. The Mustangs have the Cobra and GT500 which no stock F-body can compete with. Also the Mustangs have the Mach1. Dude you are fighting a losing battle there. I'd take your little LT1 and go look for some SOHC GT's and keep imagining you are the man.
Cobra's and Gt500's are substantially more expensive, and yes I'm sure they could beat my $6k formula. Come stopsign let's not compare apples to pumpkins
Cobra's and Gt500's are substantially more expensive, and yes I'm sure they could beat my $6k formula. Come stopsign let's not compare apples to pumpkins
Phirepower, Im not knocking your car in ANY way, just making a statement.
09-11-2007, 06:15 PM
#79
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by supersickss
i sure hope when you wrote that you didnt mean your car...
09-11-2007, 06:25 PM
#80
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Um, I'm not sure if you actually read what I was responding to... the 96-98 GTs were not even close to the slowest Mustangs ever made. And you can say what you'd like about the new GTs, but atleast people CAN buy them