Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Lets talking about people who dont understand racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2007 | 01:48 PM
  #41  
blackhawk_02's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
The car makes ~440rwhp bone stock... that is not "bitching out." It's just heavy (3,950lbs).
Wrong, my friend.

Curb Weight: Coupe - 3920 lb
Convertible - 4040 lb

It's ok. You're just a Mustang guy. Why should you know that?
Old 12-05-2007 | 01:59 PM
  #42  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by blackhawk_02
Wrong, my friend.

Curb Weight: Coupe - 3920 lb
Convertible - 4040 lb

It's ok. You're just a Mustang guy. Why should you know that?
Excuse me for being 30lbs off of the coupe's weight... . And I am NOT a "Mustang guy." I just own one.
Old 12-05-2007 | 02:22 PM
  #43  
blackhawk_02's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

lol, chill buddy, it's all in good fun!
Old 12-05-2007 | 02:45 PM
  #44  
LT1SC95Z's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: orland park IL
Default

anyone say what they will about a GT500. dealer down the street has one in the show room and its pretty sharp, and im a chevy guy.
440 rwhp stock is nothing to be ashamed of, thats damn good.
with some fat tires and few little mods it would be considered fast by any stretch of the imagination or a streetable car.
thing that kills it is the cost of the car.
with what people are paying above sticker, you could get a new C6 with 436 horses (with the optional exhaust). which is much lighter and ive seen stock Vette vs GT500 and the vette won by more than a couple seconds traction worth.
Old 12-05-2007 | 04:50 PM
  #45  
SleeperCibby's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Akira_X
The gt500 has incredibly shitty suspension and doesn't even have an LSD...
Are you freakin serious?
Old 12-05-2007 | 07:33 PM
  #46  
NightWindDriftr's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: Key West, FL / Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Azrael
I thought "fast can" was the new Taco Bell slogan? You know, when I forget about what happens when I eat there, and then have to get to the "can fast"!
Old 12-05-2007 | 08:39 PM
  #47  
blackhawk_02's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

i heard the new gt500's had 475rwhp? who knows...frankly, who cares...i dont.
Old 12-05-2007 | 08:45 PM
  #48  
LT1SC95Z's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: orland park IL
Default

top gear chassi dynoed it at 447rwhp.
Old 12-05-2007 | 09:43 PM
  #49  
ponygt65's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Gt450?...when did that come out?
Old 12-05-2007 | 10:46 PM
  #50  
TXFORMULA's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ponygt65
Gt450?...when did that come out?
in between the GT350 & the GT500
Old 12-05-2007 | 11:18 PM
  #51  
ponygt65's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by TXFORMULA
in between the GT350 & the GT500
Closer to the 500 right?
Old 12-05-2007 | 11:27 PM
  #52  
mullenh's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: pensacola, florida
Default

Originally Posted by 95hitam6
for the price gt500's are not that fast
LOL you just made the list.
Old 12-06-2007 | 03:29 AM
  #53  
1badgt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

Everyone should know what a 'faster can' is, they are actually out there. That is what you put on your honda!
Old 12-06-2007 | 05:54 AM
  #54  
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Default

i think its 60% car 40% driver because some drivers can really screw up a car ;D
a fast car can be made slow by the driver lol
Old 12-06-2007 | 04:23 PM
  #55  
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 1
From: COLUMBUS GA.
Default spoken like a true racer.

Originally Posted by DarkJuggalo
i think its 60% car 40% driver because some drivers can really screw up a car ;D
a fast car can be made slow by the driver lol
People look at me crazy when I tell them my car runs 13 at 130+ I cant sixty the thing to save my life. Some people need to sit down and do the math lets say a car with 500hp traps 130+ in the 1/4 thats true numbers because the sixty and the power is there lets say a car with 120hp traps 120+ in the 1/4 that **** aint true do the math even with a .1.1 sixty it wont do it
Old 12-06-2007 | 05:58 PM
  #56  
305 h.o.'s Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Union City, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
The car makes ~440rwhp bone stock... that is not "bitching out." It's just heavy (3,950lbs).
Yea, It's just heavy and Slowwwwwwww.................
Old 12-06-2007 | 06:04 PM
  #57  
305 h.o.'s Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Union City, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Excuse me for being 30lbs off of the coupe's weight... . And I am NOT a "Mustang guy." I just own one.
Not a mustang guy? You post on here defending mustangs all the time!!!!!!!
There's no shame in admitting that your a ford fan, there's nothing wrong with that. At least your not a ricer fan and invested your money in one of those fast can intake and exhaust systems this guy who started this thread is talking about.
Old 12-06-2007 | 06:32 PM
  #58  
PowerShift408's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 1
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default

Originally Posted by OUTLAWZ RACING
People look at me like I'm crazy when I tell them my car runs 13s at 130+. I can't sixty the thing to save my life. Some people need to sit down and do the math. Let's say car "A" with 500hp, traps 130+ in the 1/4. That sounds reasonable because trap speed is the indicator of true power output. But you also have to take into account the weight of the car. Now, let's say a car weighing the same as car "A" with 120hp traps 120+ in the 1/4. That is not logical. The power to weight ratios say that this is impossible. Even with a .1 sixty, it won't do it
Fixed it for you.
Old 12-06-2007 | 06:37 PM
  #59  
PowerShift408's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 1
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default

Originally Posted by blackhawk_02
I think he meant "car".
No way, you've got to be kidding me.
Old 12-07-2007 | 12:17 AM
  #60  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 305 h.o.
Not a mustang guy? You post on here defending mustangs all the time!!!!!!!
There's no shame in admitting that your a ford fan, there's nothing wrong with that. At least your not a ricer fan and invested your money in one of those fast can intake and exhaust systems this guy who started this thread is talking about.
I am a car guy. I've owned/driven regularly everything from a '96 Taurus to a '94 Integra GS-R to a '94 Corvette... I just call it like I see it, usually based on personal experience or common sense.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.