Sub frames
Thanks, talk to you soon.
When he gets his computer fixed he will be joining us soon.
I have SLP bolt-on's for a long time now and they have given me no problems (no loosening, noise, etc..) and they make a world of difference. They are a bit heavier than the other ones mentioned, but since they are diamond shaped, they are very strong.
Tommy
Trending Topics
If a part doesn't really work, it's just added weight and a waste of money.
With a bolt on part, the bolt holes are a tiny bit larger than the bolt itself. This tiny bit of play is necessary so the bolts will slide through the holes. When tightened, only the friction between the 2 flat surfaces is what keeps the SFCs from moving that tiny amount.
Now, what are you attempting to accomplish with SFCs? ... body flex. So the 2 points you have as connection points are moving against each other during chassis twist, held by only the friction of 90 ft/lbs of torque.
Do you think the forces generated by a hard launch or high G turn will induce chassis flex equal to or greater than 90 ft/lbs.?
Weld the damn things ....
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
But people still buy them bolt ins, & it would be better than nothing at all.
It's like telling someone to either go cheap & inferior w/their car or do it the right way.
The reverse psychology method.
Get in there & grind a few gears on 'em.
Weld the damn things ....
bolt-in is a waste of money. think about it. you buy bolt-ins for what reason? the only thing i can think of is so you can have them to sell whenever the car is being sold. you get maybe half of what you paid, right? save that half NOW, buy the weld-ins, and save yourself a lot of trouble in the future. my SFC's (brand new) costed - shipping and installation included - $140. can you find bolt-ins that cheap and that hassle free?
bolt-in is a waste of money.
The explanation you stated above is flawed (90 ft/lb theory). Subframe connectors are primarily there to stop twist. The torque spec on the bolts have no directly correlation to how effective the SFCs are. The force on the bolts are complicated, but in my experience they are have never loosened or made a sound.
Anyway, I really don't think anyone is making a mistake by purchasing bolt-in SFCs. They work fantastic for me and other's I know. It's great for those do-it-your-selfers who can't weld.
Good luck in your decision. Either way you will be fine.
Tommy
I felt the same way as I had SLP bolt-on for 3 years on the car,
Then I had them welded in last fall.
And the difference IS noticeable, over the bolt on.
If you can find a competant welder, get it done, it's EVEN better.
My $.02.
But people still buy them bolt ins, & it would be better than nothing at all.
It's like telling someone to either go cheap & inferior w/their car or do it the right way.
The reverse psychology method.
Get in there & grind a few gears on 'em.
I think you ARE better without them, if they are bolt ins.
I understand sheer loading and bolt stretch. The point is if the chassis twists, and you must think it will or why would you buy SFCs in the first place, the 2 mounting points are going to be shifted out of align, in all 3 directions.
As tight as you get that bolt will be the deciding factor on how much force the SFCs can take before moving ... not loosening, moving. The bolts can stay at 90ft/lbs and if 100 ft/lbs of torque is applied, the bearing surfaces are gonna move.
And any welder worth his salt can stitch weld these guys. It's really not rocket science.
Last edited by mitchntx; Feb 2, 2004 at 07:02 AM.
One simple Example: I bring my 87 vette in for new tires. I must have warned the guys 10 times not to jack from a certain spot because the fiberglass WILL crack. Did they listen, NO! I am waiting outside the garage bay and I hear the most God awful crunching sound as the lift is starting to go, and I hear a guy yell "STOP!!" Morons...
Tommy
NY isn't that large of a state, though. There HAS to be a competent welder within a 2 hour radius of where you live.
It is well worth the investment of your time.





