Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors
View Poll Results: which sfc's?
SLP Welded
3
15.79%
SLP Bolt-on
4
21.05%
BMR Boxed
4
21.05%
BMR Tubular
8
42.11%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

SFC's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2004 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
02WS6Bird's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
From: Palos Hills, IL
Default SFC's?

Sub-frame connectors....from who should i get them...and tubular or boxed...weld-on or bolt-on?

im looking between SLP and BMR but any suggestions will be taken into consideration
Old 03-26-2004 | 08:12 PM
  #2  
XtinctHawk02's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX USA
Default

They say the "weld-ons" are alot better than bolt on's. I am probably going to go with BMR myself.
Old 03-26-2004 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
DARK AGE 53's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
From: Mi./Al.
Default

SLP or Don Goetz bolt-on SFC's have my vote.

Al
Old 03-26-2004 | 09:59 PM
  #4  
DaveX's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Default

I like the 3 point design like the SLP (and there is at least one other) myself. They are a bit heavier but I think they have a slight advantage in helping with chasis flex, which is what they are supposed to do. If you go SLP, the bolt ins and weld ins are exactly the same except the bolt ins come powder coated and with the mounting hardware and the weld ins come plain and will need to be at least painted. Buy the bolt ins and you can still weld them in if you want to and then you just have to touch up the welded areas with paint. I have mine bolted in right now and so far haven't fealt the need to weld them.
Old 03-27-2004 | 05:27 AM
  #5  
smokin' joe 00 ss's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

SLP bolt on's here.
Old 03-29-2004 | 01:20 AM
  #6  
Cal's Avatar
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 3
From: Northern Utah
Default

SLP weld on's.
Old 03-29-2004 | 01:41 AM
  #7  
95_Firehawk_Dude's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Tinley Park
Default

I heard that the Kenny Brown were real good. Any opinions on that? Those are the ones i was thinking about getting.

-Scott
__________

'95 Firehawk. Red on red. Stock (for now)
Old 03-29-2004 | 02:38 AM
  #8  
tuffluck's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

subframes are subframes are subframes...just get some damn subframes, it doesn't really matter which, they all will do about the same in the long run.
Old 03-29-2004 | 02:54 AM
  #9  
Gamble's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: 3rd CoAsSt
Default

Got the BMR Tubular... Still need to get em' on
Old 03-29-2004 | 10:19 PM
  #10  
droopy726's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by tuffluck
subframes are subframes are subframes...just get some damn subframes, it doesn't really matter which, they all will do about the same in the long run.
gotta disagree here, you get more ground clearance w/ tubular's but boxed ones are stronger, also theres a big difference between 2pt and 3pt sfc's.
Old 03-30-2004 | 01:47 AM
  #11  
98sspullin'em's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Texas
Default

and i dont care about long run, just 1/4 mile run....

im in the same boat as you man
Old 03-30-2004 | 03:22 AM
  #12  
Bad Mojo's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

I went with Spohn chrome moly tubular's. Weigh 25% less than steel, and they are 50% stronger.
Tuck up nice and tight too, can't see 'em unless your looking under the car.
Old 03-31-2004 | 10:49 PM
  #13  
demonspeed's Avatar
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

I like the way the Spohn tubulars tuck up nice like Bad Mojo said... but on the other hand, I like the boxed BMR's because you can use them as a jacking point... Hard choice, but you can't lose with either.
Old 04-01-2004 | 07:55 AM
  #14  
markss2oo1's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Eastern PA
Default

I dont know why people complain about ground clearence with SFC's. There is so much more stuff under our car that hangs lower than them.
Old 04-01-2004 | 10:12 PM
  #15  
WAHUSKER's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, WA
Default

Kenny Browns are stronger than SLPs. But they have issues with other mods, like drive shaft loops. Which you need at the track. I have the SLP bolt-ons, and the SLP DSL. They work fine so far. Boxed are stronger than tubular, and 3 point are stronger than 2. And you can use the boxed as jack points too!



Quick Reply: SFC's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.