Difference in LCA's
Secondly are there any cons with adjustables? Do they ever need re-adjusted?
I understand they help center your rear axle and reduce wheel hop but after that I'm pretty clueless haha.. Plus my car is lowered so I know they are needed quite badly
Rod/rod use rod ends on both ends. This setup allows for unrestricted articulation, but they tend to be quite harsh and noisy since there is no damping in them at all.
Poly/rod tries to bridge the gap somewhat, by having poly on the chassis side (doesn't need much articulation on that end) and rod on the axle side (where it needs to be able to twist). Gets you halfway between.
There are other options other companies have, such as UMI with their roto joint, Founders with their 3 piece poly joint, etc, each with varying degrees of articulation, noise, deflection, and harshness/comfort.
I'm running Founders 3 piece poly joint on my car as mine is street driven but I didn't want the noise from a rod end, but wanted less deflection than rubber would give me.
As far as adjustable, adjustable LCAs are only really needed when stuffing a really tall tire in the wheel well and you have to get it perfectly centered, or if you want to adjust your thrust angle. Once they're set they don't need readjusted usually. I'm running non-adjustable as they were cheaper and I didn't see a need for adjustable on my car.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
LCA relocation brackets are a maybe. I've heard if you're doing all street they really aren't that important and can hurt handling somewhat. I can't say for sure if mine do or not since I improved so many things at the same time any detriment from them is greatly overshadowed by all the other improvements lol.
The PH Bar can be poly ends, that doesn't add to harshness. And I'd stay away from adjustable LCAs unless you plan to run a 28" tire.










