Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

K-members, control arms and some common misconceptions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2015, 11:21 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I don't see any binding issues with those front end components as they are not using a poly bushing in that vertical caster bushing area. Definitely a non-issue. Being rod end and poly vs rubber may have an impact on ride comfort however, but how much I don't know.
Old 05-04-2015, 10:48 AM
  #22  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Streetability is not at all compromised. The rear rod end does transfer slightly more NVH than a factory rubber bushing, but when you are already running a tubular K-member it won't really be noticeable above that. Binding it not an issue at all however. The poly bushings are free floating, as well as the rod end that is in the vertical position. That is one of the main advantages of a tubular arm versus a stock arm with bonded rubber bushings, your suspension has less resistance to movement
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 05-04-2015, 02:54 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1 FMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMR Tech2

We also put a set of our AA004 adjustable upper arms up to see. As we expected, due to the extra hardware and rod ends and such, they came in at 7 lbs. 1 lb more than the stockers. However, they can provide much more camber and caster adjustment for those who are lowered more than usual, or are after hardcore handling performance.
will your AA004 a-arms help me compete with these guys ?

The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (09-30-2022)
Old 05-04-2015, 03:12 PM
  #24  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

LMAO... I mean, if you are so inclined you could probably get creative with them. Just please don't tell anyone they are ours. I don't want that crowd calling me for parts and advice and being considered and enabler among the community lol
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 05-25-2015, 07:21 AM
  #25  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
jstero99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm currently swapping out factory k member and a arms with your BMR replacements. I'm looking forward to feeling the difference. On your lower a arms it says modification to the strut mount may be needed for KYB struts. Of course I have KYB struts, what modification may be needed?
Old 05-26-2015, 08:47 AM
  #26  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

the center bushing portion of the KYB's in between the bolts are larger and do not fit in the opening. The center opening may need to be enlarged. Or instead of opening up the arm, I have had customers actually buy the aluminum spacer we sell and enlarge the opening in it so as not to modify their arms
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 05-28-2015, 06:35 PM
  #27  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
jstero99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much does the spacer affect ride height? It would have to raise the front end in the air. What about modifying the strut? How much would modifying the strut affect its strength structurally?
Old 05-29-2015, 09:01 AM
  #28  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

The spacer adds about 1/2" to the ride height. The issue with modifying the shock would be you have to narrow the mounting loop which means you would need a smaller bushing to fit in it. In other words, not worth it. Unfortunately there isn't really a good option when it comes to getting KYB's to work with aftermarket arms. The modified spacers are probably the the simplest and most reversible way of doing it.
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 05-29-2015, 12:11 PM
  #29  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
jstero99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Can you post a link for the spacer? I'll give it a try and see how the car sits when it's done. I rather not modify the A arm, so the spacer is the only other option besides for new struts. Thanks for all your help, it's appreciated!
Old 05-29-2015, 12:17 PM
  #30  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

http://www.bmrsuspension.com/?page=p...506&superpro=0
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 06-28-2015, 12:39 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Good info here on the weights. I have thought about going coil over for a while.
Old 06-29-2015, 07:11 PM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
ssjason232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Warrenton VA
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I have the BMR 1" drop lower control arms. The ride does not feel any worse, how ever, after about 8k of street miles, they do make a hell of a lot of noise. The creaking and clanking of the rod ends can drive one nuts on a day with the windows up and no radio on.

I had thoughts of trying one of UMIs roto joints, but not sure yet if they would tread up.
Old 10-19-2015, 08:57 PM
  #33  
Teching In
 
jaimers16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interested in quote for front and rear coil overs for a 96 Camaro RS that is daily driven and likes turning quick yet want to drive smooth!
Old 10-19-2015, 09:11 PM
  #34  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
BLINGOLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeland floirda
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've ran my Bmr k member and a arms for about 4years now without a single problem and still love the stuff.
Old 10-20-2015, 07:19 AM
  #35  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
UMI Sales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jaimers16
Interested in quote for front and rear coil overs for a 96 Camaro RS that is daily driven and likes turning quick yet want to drive smooth!
P.M. Sent
Old 10-20-2015, 09:20 AM
  #36  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (40)
 
BMR Sales2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jaimers16
Interested in quote for front and rear coil overs for a 96 Camaro RS that is daily driven and likes turning quick yet want to drive smooth!
PM coming your way!

Originally Posted by BLINGOLE
I've ran my Bmr k member and a arms for about 4years now without a single problem and still love the stuff.
We definitely appreciate you choosing us for your suspension and chassis needs. If you ever need anything else just hit me up.
__________________
Glenn ***
Sales Tech
www.bmrsuspension.com
813.986.9302


Find a Quality alignment shop near you!
Old 02-08-2016, 09:45 AM
  #37  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (40)
 
BMR Sales2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Going to bring this back up, since I have had a few more questions lately regarding this
__________________
Glenn ***
Sales Tech
www.bmrsuspension.com
813.986.9302


Find a Quality alignment shop near you!
Old 02-08-2016, 12:36 PM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMR Tech2
Streetability is not at all compromised. The rear rod end does transfer slightly more NVH than a factory rubber bushing, but when you are already running a tubular K-member it won't really be noticeable above that. Binding it not an issue at all however. The poly bushings are free floating, as well as the rod end that is in the vertical position. That is one of the main advantages of a tubular arm versus a stock arm with bonded rubber bushings, your suspension has less resistance to movement
I just purchased your turbo k-member and tunnel mount torque arm.

I too was worried about losing any of the solid stock steering feel and smoothness it has.
Also, my car will see 160-180mph runs......and need solid lateral stability.

Will BMR upper and lower arms change anything at all....or will the feel be 100% the same where I wouldn't even know the parts were changed...?

.
Old 02-08-2016, 12:43 PM
  #39  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (40)
 
BMR Sales2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

The arms will deliver a firmer, more positive and responsive feel. The stock arms flex some and the bushings are rather sloppy. Especially talking those kinds of speeds. The only debate at that point would be whether or not to run adjustable uppers. The adjustable ones will deliver a more solid feel, but in trade will deliver more NVH transferred into the cabin of the car
__________________
Glenn ***
Sales Tech
www.bmrsuspension.com
813.986.9302


Find a Quality alignment shop near you!
Old 02-08-2016, 05:02 PM
  #40  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMR Sales2
The arms will deliver a firmer, more positive and responsive feel. The stock arms flex some and the bushings are rather sloppy. Especially talking those kinds of speeds. The only debate at that point would be whether or not to run adjustable uppers. The adjustable ones will deliver a more solid feel, but in trade will deliver more NVH transferred into the cabin of the car

Would I be wasting my time just getting lowers and using stock uppers...?

.


Quick Reply: K-members, control arms and some common misconceptions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.