sfc's tubular or boxed
08-31-2004, 01:48 PM
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sfc's tubular or boxed Just what it says, tubular or boxed? The car is not lowered, but I would like to not have any ground clearance issues when I am done. I have decided that I will do weld in, but I need to know if I should do tubular or boxed. Any help and suggestions wouyld be greatly appreciated.
08-31-2004, 01:53 PM
#2
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anna, TX
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just installed the BMR boxed. Honestly, I don't know what the big deal was. My pacesetter/Y/stock exhaust hang lower than the SFC did.
They tuck up very nicely. I have been intending to take some side profile pics as I didn't find any when I was shopping around.
DEE
They tuck up very nicely. I have been intending to take some side profile pics as I didn't find any when I was shopping around.
DEE
08-31-2004, 04:34 PM
#3
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the boxed SLP units on my car, everyone says the hang low, but it dosent pose a problem. If your not wanting to do a double diamond design id give the hotchkis a try. Theyre a boxed design also, and from the ones ive seen tuck up really well too.
08-31-2004, 06:28 PM
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plainfield, CT
Posts: 10,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check out the BMR web site. www.bmrfabrication.com They have an explination on the pros & cons of each. Basically the boxed are stronger, but give up some ground clearance.
