going to be road racing
Considering the significant amount of time Mitch and John have spent open tracking, and I have several hours of actual track time myself, what makes you think we don't know what's best when we say worry about the driver and brakes first?
1) you're not going to have a bad day at the track or have any diminished fun because you didn't buy any of those items in your original post
2) I have no problem saying that spending time working on your driving skills will net you 10 times the amount of time those parts will
3) all those parts would easily buy you 2 more track days which is nearly invaluable in comparison
4) if you really want to stick through the turns, I haven't seen you mention anything about a wheel & tire package. Besides brakes, that's where there's real time to pick up.
5) in the off chance you don't like it, or find it's too risky to chance permanently losing your car to the track, why buy $1,000 worth of stuff that's not going to be fully utilized or not work for taking to the strip?
6) assuming you have a blast, and want to do this more, then you'll truly need to decide whether you want the car to be built for open tracking/rr or for the strip. There really isn't room to compromise. The more you get into it, the more you'll later regret buying "compromise" parts that hold you back. We all dream of a super car capable of all things, but the reality is you're cheating yourself in two forms of motorsports rather than cheating yourself in one and excelling in another.
But you have a choice. The guy you plow into because you overdrove a "safe" car didn't.
Watch this video ...
http://www.teamsmr.com/movies/viperattack.mp4
It's a testament to how fast things can happen and what can happen when on the track with an ***-clown.
The other problem is that everyone has a slightly different style. Meaning, I may hate Mitch's car and he may hate mine. Absolute Speed may hate both of them (he's already has "issues" driving mine....
), etc. My setup may not work for you. I'm guessing that one of the 3 would, or parts of all 3 could, etc. Once you drive the car and find the things you don't like, we can help you change them. But, if we get it "wrong" and you go to the track with a car that is a bit nervous and that you're not comfortable with (like my current setup), you could wind up in a wall. The stock setup is "safe".If you must spend money/upgrade, buy shocks. They have the most impact on the feel of the vehicle. Then, get an alignment.
Last edited by trackbird; Jul 1, 2005 at 12:36 PM.
First, I guarantee that Mitch, Trackbird and John will all give you different recommendations on shocks and springs, though all three will speak from lots of varied experiences.
Second, I guarantee that if you listen to any of them or myself (which I'd defer to those guys anyway) and you want springs and shocks for $500-600 as you previously requested, you're hosed. It's just not going to happen unless you go out into the used market, and who wants used shocks with an unknown history unless you plan on having them rebuilt?
Third, I hope to heaven your $5-600 mark doesn't include install, or does involve you doing the install. You can go ahead and add $200 for install if you don't do it yourself.
Does that answer your question?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Handling is a very personal thing ... a comfort zone, knowing , WITH CONFIDENCE, where the edge is, feeling where it is and then reigning it back in. As Kevin eluded to, with a bunch of performance suspension parts, the window of oppurtunity to recover from a venture into 11/10s becomes smaller and smaller.
A good handling car handles great at track speeds under track conditions. It might absolutely suck on the hiway.
All any of us are telling you is ...
AFTER you get some comfort behind the wheel, then look and listen to what your car is telling you. Then and only then, begin swapping stock parts for aftermarket.
You ahve said time and time again that you have some worn out parts that need replacing. Well, replace them.
Just like with a motor, a tried and true measuring stick is to establish a baseline on a dyno. This allows you to analyze modifications to see where you have come and where you need to go.
Tuning a suspension is not unlike tuning a motor.
And, nobody plans to push their car 100%, but it does happen. You get into a corner too hot and wind up "in trouble". Or, you get comfortable and can get in trouble quickly. Tape a sticker (post it note?) on the dash that says "Smooth" or "Slow" or some combination of the above to remind you not to just crank on the wheel, keep your inputs smooth to avoid upsetting the chassis and to keep yourself "calm". That may do more for your driving than any parts you can buy.
And, have fun. (See, we're not trying to be big meanie heads, but we are trying to keep you out of trouble and help you avoid common pitfalls). You'll get plenty of help as soon as you know what you need (that will make more sense in the very near future).
BTW, Kevin, I really like that "SLOW" sticker idea. I'll slap one on your dash for the next AutoX.
BTW, Kevin, I really like that "SLOW" sticker idea. I'll slap one on your dash for the next AutoX.

You can't write "SLOW" in large enough print to affect me anymore....lol.
And, a "loose" car is a function of both the car and the driver. I've seen it in person. One driver has a car that just pushes like crazy, another driver tries it and winds up spinning it.....the same car. How? Throttle control is everything and you can mishandle it and spin it. The driver can make it loose, and so can the setup. When you start running the Camaro, just be gentle and remember "Smooth" and that applies to the throttle input as well.
And a big thanks to mitchntx and trackbird. Without your knowledge, I would've wasted my money as well as myself. That video not only demonstrates what I've witnessed on a Road Course, but several times a month on the highway. I commute from my home in San Diego to work in Irvine, and I have witnessed drivers like this on the I-5 more times than I care to admit.
Not to through a monkey wrench into it, but.... while I understand what you are saying about safety and car limits, I'm a little unsure about the analogy. In it, we have an imaginary absolute limit (the "edge") and before that we have a virtual line (car limit), and the idea mentioned is that with the line further from the edge, you can go past the car's limit but not "fall off". I'm not quite sure I see that one. Isn't the cars limit, the edge? If going past the car's limit isn't the worst that can happen, then what is? I guess to me it's a little like WWII fighters all having 100% throttle and "War Emergency Power" (110%) - well, which is 100% really? And when looking at "top speed at full power" charts, which are they talking about? (not a perfect analogy, but I hope it's close enough lol)
And... having said that, is a Corvette stock set up more dangerous on a track for the inexperienced? If not, doesn't it handle "better" than an F-Body?
Again, I agree with the intent of your posts and am not trying to argue or undermine, just curious.


