Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

.14gs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2005, 04:00 PM
  #1  
HPP
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
HPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default .14gs?

How much difference is that really? Can it be felt? What would it do for lap times? (I know there's a plethora of other factors involved in lap times, but assuming all else equal but that....)

What about 4.6mph in the slalom?
Old 10-31-2005, 05:13 PM
  #2  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,591
Received 142 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

a .14g gain in grip is about a 15% gain in grip in a car that pulls .9g on a skidpad. Not insignificant at all. 4.6 mph in a slalom can be big too, but that depends a lot on the slalom spacing. 4.6 mph faster in a slalom with 60 foot gates is a lot more impressive than 4.6 with 100 foot gates.

All that said... Grip is nothing without driveability. Stock the car will pull around .9g on a skidpad. A smooth pad where the driving dynamics are not in play. You get the car to take a set and run around in circles. A car can pull great numbers and be a mess to drive. Gaining speed in a slalom is better measure of increased performance as the driving dynamics are at work.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
Old 11-01-2005, 09:42 AM
  #3  
HPP
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
HPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the answer.

Unfortunately I typo'd. I meant to say .04, not .14.

I didn't realize there were different sizes of slaloms. I thought it was an estabilished industry standard because every time you see that info listed, it never gives any indiction about the configuration of the test.

And since I'm looking at tests of 2 different cars from 2 different sources, it's next to impossible to tell if they are similar test conditions.
Old 11-01-2005, 11:00 AM
  #4  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The best thing would be to look at what your goals are; why are you comparing these two cars? What is important to you, and specifically what are you trying to find out? For small amounts like this, one car could easily perform better than the other with a slightly different setup, or on a slightly different track design. Driver style and ability will make the biggest difference, so the most important thing is for the car setup to make the driver feel confident.
Old 11-02-2005, 05:37 PM
  #5  
HPP
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
HPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My goals really are just to get a handle on the differences. To "grok" it, if you will. Numbers are great to read, but without understanding them, it doesn't mean much.

Unfortunately, I don't have access to the other car, so it's hard to drive them for comparison, and there are no local road courses either.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.