Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

K-member trade off's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #1  
sdbrown84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Question K-member trade off's?

I am seriously considering an UMI Race K-member as it seems to be the strongest one I can research. I don't mind paying the price tag for a better constructed unit, my question: is there any trade-offs with using any aftermarket K compared to stock?

I've heard of wheel rubbing issues, increased vibrations, and "others".

Has anyone had any complications with this K-member or even any other manufacturers in general?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
DanWS6's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Default

I'd like to know this as well
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #3  
sdbrown84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Nothing to be looking out for?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #4  
UMI Performance's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,473
Likes: 7
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Default

Hello, Thanks for considering our product

Our K-member retains the A-arms in the factory location so rubbing will not be a issue. But I have heard of others moving the wheels back or forth, I have not personally seen this though.

As for vibrations, the K-member really has no effect on this. My guess is there were multiple items installed with the K-member so a assumption of the K-member causing vibrations could be possible. It won't drive any different then a car with a factory K-member.

If I can help anymore please ask and I am glad to. Thank you!

Ryan
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #5  
jmilz28's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 125
From: Houston, TX
Default

The K-member itself should cause no changes to ride or handling. Thing is, most people go to poly motor and tranny mounts at the same time, which WILL cause massive changes (especially the tranny mount).
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #6  
DanWS6's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Default

Originally Posted by jmilz28
The K-member itself should cause no changes to ride or handling. Thing is, most people go to poly motor and tranny mounts at the same time, which WILL cause massive changes (especially the tranny mount).
What kind of changes?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #7  
sdbrown84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

I have changed to poly bushings all around already and you can "feel" more of the car. Which is what I wanted. Just wanted to make sure everything lines up perfectly with the install so I don't have to worry.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #8  
Sam Strano's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,610
Likes: 152
From: Brookville, PA
Default

He's talking about vibrations.... But I have poly engine mounts in my car, and it's no issue. A poly tranny mount has increased driveline vibration though. None the less, none of that has anything to do with the K-member.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #9  
DanWS6's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Default

Thanks for the replies. I'm trying to decide if $500 is really worth it for the 22lbs in weight savings.

Is there a major structural difference between the stocker and the UMI race/street version?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #10  
02Z28LS1's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by DanWS6
Thanks for the replies. I'm trying to decide if $500 is really worth it for the 22lbs in weight savings.

Is there a major structural difference between the stocker and the UMI race/street version?
you should also keep in mind that you are not only shedding weight off the front, but you are gaining strength and extra adjustability with the new k-member, as well as gaining much-needed clearance for things like long-tube headers. for $490 for the standard version, or $570 for the even stronger road race version, that seems like a bargain.

Last edited by 02Z28LS1; Apr 10, 2008 at 10:35 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #11  
DanWS6's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Default

Originally Posted by 02Z28LS1
you should also keep in mind that you are not only shedding weight off the front, but you are gaining strength and extra adjustability with the new k-member, as well as gaining much-needed clearance for things like long-tube headers. for $490 for the standard version, or $570 for the even stronger road race version, that seems like a bargain.
That's a valid point. I just started adding up figures of what it's going to cost to do my build. My head hurts.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #12  
sdbrown84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

I think I will do the standard version, it seems like a good deal. I'm sick of my headers hitting the stocker. Not to mention getting to the spark plugs should finally be easier now.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.