Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Adj Torque Arm questions....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2008, 08:36 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
BBYZED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Adj Torque Arm questions....

Hey everyone,

I've got a 2000 Z28 with M6. I lowered my car earlier this summer, and installed an adj panhad bar at the same time. I'm still experiencing some drivetrain whine, mostly just in 6th gear. So, time to get an adj torque arm. I'm looking for a couple recommendations:

1. Which is the better option, connecting to the tunnel brace or the transmission?

2. I'm leaning toward the UMI adj tq arm, but is there another similar option that may be lighter or stronger?

3. Keep in mind that my car is still pretty close to stock power wise, with no plans to have a 9 sec 1/4 mile car, so the extreme duty arm is likely not necessary.

Thanks!
Old 08-19-2008, 09:58 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
BadBandit69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bourbonnais, IL
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well if you get the tunnel brace style ta that is designed for longtubes you will lose some ground clearance. The trans connect ta is i believe a lil cheaper. But if you plan on running some low 60's it may not be the best choice. The chromemoly versions are stronger and lighter. Btw i have the umi tunnel mount and love it. My car is lowered about an 1" and I do hit the crossmember from time to time. But it is one stout piece so you don't have to worry about hurting it.
Old 08-19-2008, 10:13 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Its not better to connect the TA to the trans. Its better to get the relocation crossmember & get the TA off the trans if you go with a TA. I have heard many stories of the trans tailshaft housing breaking because TA is trans mounted. Getting the relocation crossmember & adjustable TA costs more than the tunnel mounted. Thats one of the reasons I went with the tunnel mounted.
Old 08-20-2008, 09:41 AM
  #4  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

We offer a full length torque arm/relocation setup that will clear your long tubes and is one of the strongest setups on the market. I will post you a link and some pictures. Give me a call if you have any questions. We are in the office mon-fri 8:30am-6pm est.

http://www.bmrfabrication.com/F4.htm
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!

Last edited by BMR Tech2; 12-09-2008 at 09:26 AM.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:16 PM
  #5  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,586
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Let's take a step back here and review what the thread starter stated. Mostly: "3. Keep in mind that my car is still pretty close to stock power wise, with no plans to have a 9 sec 1/4 mile car, so the extreme duty arm is likely not necessary."

It's clear you want an adjustable TA. That's fine. The trick is deciding what style...

Regarding Trans vs. Tunnel mount: For all the whining about the tranny mount, it's very rare they break and even less in situations where the isn't making stupid power. I think the tranny mount is more than adequate in most normal situations.

If you absolutely want to get the TA off the tranny, that's fine too. Then you have to decide which type of TA you want to do that job. Choices being tunnel mount, or standard TA with a relocation bracket.

I opt for the standard length TA with relocation bracket for a couple of very simple reasons. First, the relocation bracket is a new tranny crossmember and bolts to/puts the TA load into a part of the floor designed for drivetrain loads from GM. Further that setup transmits less vibration--again due to the fact it's bolted to a much stronger part of the floorpan.

If you opt for a tunnel mount you need to consider that the TA will bolt to a thin part of the car (and if you aren't sure, just look at it vs. where the transmission crossmember/TA relocation bracket bolts up). That location is not only thinner, but also right under you. *IF* you opt for this setup, I pretty much consider it a requirement to also have 3-point SFC's to disperse the TA load to the SFC's and outer unibody rails and not into the sheet metal floorpan.

What I'm recommending is a standard length TA. You can do that for $299.

If you want it off the tranny you get a relocation bracket for $239.


Those two together do add up to more than a tunnel mounted TA. However you can do them separately if you want to. TA first, bracket later. And If you add 3-pt SFC's to the cost of the the tunnel mount TA (assuming you don't have the SFC's already) you're actually spending a bunch more money.

TA's and Relocation brackets can be seen here: http://www.stranoparts.com/searchbym...D=18&ModelID=7

SFC's are here: http://www.stranoparts.com/searchbym...D=22&ModelID=7
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 08-20-2008, 08:27 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
BBYZED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good stuff so far, and I'll add a bit more.

I have the BMR boxed, weld-in SFCs on the car. I'm going for the adjustable ta so the pinion angle can be adjusted to remove the drivetrain noise, and of course, make the chassis just a little stronger.

Given Sam's advice, the standard length seems fine. Mostly I was just worried about the ta having the same effect as some transmission mounts were reported to have, in that they created more noise and vibration.

Now, that being said, I do plan to add headers in the future, so the standard length ta will allow me the most flexibility in that regard?
Old 08-21-2008, 11:29 AM
  #7  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,586
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BBYZED
Good stuff so far, and I'll add a bit more.

I have the BMR boxed, weld-in SFCs on the car. I'm going for the adjustable ta so the pinion angle can be adjusted to remove the drivetrain noise, and of course, make the chassis just a little stronger.

Given Sam's advice, the standard length seems fine. Mostly I was just worried about the ta having the same effect as some transmission mounts were reported to have, in that they created more noise and vibration.

Now, that being said, I do plan to add headers in the future, so the standard length ta will allow me the most flexibility in that regard?
The TA will not make the chassis any stronger, fwiw. It's a suspension part, not a chassis part like SFC's or STB's. And the noise comes from not from tranny mounted TA's, but tunnel mounted ones. After all the standard TA is tranny mounted too.

I'm wondering if there might not be a bit of confusion here. If so, you can feel free to call me to discuss. 814-849-3450
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 08-21-2008, 03:30 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
ynkssws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sam,

I'm in the same boat of the OP. I have diamond bolt in subframe connectors with LT's and the QTP merge. Can I give you a call and help me out?
Old 08-21-2008, 03:40 PM
  #9  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,586
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Sure.....
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 08-23-2008, 08:24 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
BBYZED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sam Strano
The TA will not make the chassis any stronger, fwiw. It's a suspension part, not a chassis part like SFC's or STB's. And the noise comes from not from tranny mounted TA's, but tunnel mounted ones. After all the standard TA is tranny mounted too.

I'm wondering if there might not be a bit of confusion here. If so, you can feel free to call me to discuss. 814-849-3450

It is a suspension part. It's just my dumb a** using the wrong terms.

The noise I was referring to was not from TAs, but from people replacing the tranny mount itself (from what I had heard). I want the adj ta to reduce or remove the drivetrain noise (pinion angle being off), and off course to aid with launches.

I'm not confused, I think.
Old 08-23-2008, 08:56 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My tunnel mount UMI does not vibrate the car anymore than stock. But Im still messing with it because sometimes on hard downshifts or launches there is some very loud banging coming from somewhere near the mount or rear of the trans or possibly DS is banging the loop???? Still not possitive what it is and it doesnt happen unless your WOT. Anyone else with this prob? I really dont want to use washers to drop the mount a bit. With the suspension fully dropped the DS weight DOES just barely rub the DS loop.
Old 08-24-2008, 11:53 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
tpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't forget also that if you get into some really hard braking you are much more likely to induce wheel hop with a shorter TA. I'm a big fan of the UMI arm with the relocation kit, I just don't need it on a V6




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.