Texans 2009 Schedule!!!
04-16-2009, 10:45 AM
#21
Fitz and 'Dre are more like 1 and 1A, not 1 and 2.
The only reason I might put 'Dre at 1 instead of 1A is because he sees way more coverages rolled his way than Fitz does and he still came out with more catches for more yards. The Cardinals have another legit #1 receiver in Boldin so it's almost impossible to do that to Fitz.
The only reason I might put 'Dre at 1 instead of 1A is because he sees way more coverages rolled his way than Fitz does and he still came out with more catches for more yards. The Cardinals have another legit #1 receiver in Boldin so it's almost impossible to do that to Fitz.
04-16-2009, 11:11 AM
#22
Mustang Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd have to put Andre at #1 IMHO....Teams all knew last season who the #1 threat was on the Texans and he still was able to put up the numbers he did...
Fitz is good but teams had to worry about Boldin on the other side...
Plain and simple....
C. Johnson is going to be good too...saw him burn the Texans last year!
Be interesting to see how M. Crabtree works out for whoever drafts him....
Fitz is good but teams had to worry about Boldin on the other side...
Plain and simple....
C. Johnson is going to be good too...saw him burn the Texans last year!
Be interesting to see how M. Crabtree works out for whoever drafts him....
04-16-2009, 12:37 PM
#24
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Alvin Tx
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the O-line will improve this year with the addition of a new coach. Bruce Matthews should be able to show them how it is supposed to be done.
I am predicting 10-6 but hopefull for something better.
I am predicting 10-6 but hopefull for something better.
Last edited by Randy_S; 04-17-2009 at 10:29 AM.
04-16-2009, 08:12 PM
#28
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bill Kolar is the new defensive line coach. Bruce Matthews was an O-Lineman.
04-16-2009, 08:13 PM
#29
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are tons of people outside of Houston who think Andre is better. Even during the playoffs when Fitz got to keep playing and 'Dre was watching people said he was better.
04-16-2009, 11:05 PM
#30
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston/288
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it may not be CLEARLY understod that AJ is better, but he IS better in most of the leagues eyes.
even on an 8-8 team with no legitimate 2nd WR, AJ put up the best numbers for any WR IN THE LEAGUE.
115 receptions (led league)
1,575 yards (led league)
13.7 average per catch
this guy was a monster. he was THE GO TO GUY for the Texans and people STILL couldn't stop him from "gettin his".
<---- AJ nutthugger
even on an 8-8 team with no legitimate 2nd WR, AJ put up the best numbers for any WR IN THE LEAGUE.
115 receptions (led league)
1,575 yards (led league)
13.7 average per catch
this guy was a monster. he was THE GO TO GUY for the Texans and people STILL couldn't stop him from "gettin his".
<---- AJ nutthugger
04-17-2009, 02:17 AM
#31
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it may not be CLEARLY understod that AJ is better, but he IS better in most of the leagues eyes.
even on an 8-8 team with no legitimate 2nd WR, AJ put up the best numbers for any WR IN THE LEAGUE.
115 receptions (led league)
1,575 yards (led league)
13.7 average per catch
this guy was a monster. he was THE GO TO GUY for the Texans and people STILL couldn't stop him from "gettin his".
<---- AJ nutthugger
even on an 8-8 team with no legitimate 2nd WR, AJ put up the best numbers for any WR IN THE LEAGUE.
115 receptions (led league)
1,575 yards (led league)
13.7 average per catch
this guy was a monster. he was THE GO TO GUY for the Texans and people STILL couldn't stop him from "gettin his".
<---- AJ nutthugger
04-17-2009, 04:32 AM
#32
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston/288
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i expect great things from Walter and Owen Daniels.
hell, i expect 9 wins this year from the Texans. BUT, i think 11 wins will get them in the playoffs. i think they can have 10 and STILL miss
hell, i expect 9 wins this year from the Texans. BUT, i think 11 wins will get them in the playoffs. i think they can have 10 and STILL miss
04-17-2009, 10:11 AM
#33
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We could easily go 10-6 and not make the playoffs. Hell last season the Patriots went 11-5 and didn't make the playoffs. We have to start winning division games.
04-18-2009, 12:46 PM
#36
TECH Resident
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that being said, i don't care what anybody says, Andre Johnson is the nastiest, fastest, strongest and most premier receiver in this league. he has just been robbed of numbers and productivity by the likes of Carr and Shaub. evenso, he will be a hall of famer, guaranteed.
if LeBron James and Randy Moss ever had kids, Andre Johnson would be that kid
if LeBron James and Randy Moss ever had kids, Andre Johnson would be that kid
04-18-2009, 01:55 PM
#37
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston/288
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
did you know that LeBron is pretty much 270lbs and pretty much is faster, stronger, more explosive and more athletic than anyone in the league.
the NBA is evolving right before our eyes. but this thread ain't about LeBron, it's about the Texans. AJ is the premier WR in the NFL right now. this year it's going to be a battle of WR's and i'm almost poitive, barring injury, that AJ will lead the league in catches and yards again.
that would be awesome if he could get about 11 or 12 TD's this year though
