H/C/I 150 shot mustang vs my cammed ws6! Vids
07-17-2010, 11:57 AM
#26
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mesquite TX
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've talked to Sam a couple of times actually. My only problem is Dustin is about a 45 min drive to touch up when needed. Sam will eventually end up doing it for me, him and I have talked about it already.
07-17-2010, 12:23 PM
#27
TECH Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was kinda surprised to see the Mustang go by up top... till I read stalled C4... That 'splains the less than stellar effort to get moving from a roll. "Back in the day" I had a similar setup with a 5spd and it ran mid-upper 11's on daily tires. The "launch" from a roll was way better than that though. Mine didn't have to play catch up with the converter. I expect that car would do well from 0 if it has traction. Adding juice to your car will make that one look kinda slow... again, with traction, even before a tune. 
07-17-2010, 01:57 PM
#29
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mesquite TX
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was kinda surprised to see the Mustang go by up top... till I read stalled C4... That 'splains the less than stellar effort to get moving from a roll. "Back in the day" I had a similar setup with a 5spd and it ran mid-upper 11's on daily tires. The "launch" from a roll was way better than that though. Mine didn't have to play catch up with the converter. I expect that car would do well from 0 if it has traction. Adding juice to your car will make that one look kinda slow... again, with traction, even before a tune.
07-17-2010, 02:40 PM
#30
TECH Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, so it was something else with the C4(I'm guessing maybe a C4 'Vette)... Moving on then, I can't say why it took off so poorly but then ran well. Maybe it took a bit for the nitrous to activate and/or hit the intake. 
That may explain the exhaust smoke at the start, not all that common on such a build. Lack of juice in the system would surely cause over-fueling. It could also be part of why in 1 run he caught you sooner than another.
That may explain the exhaust smoke at the start, not all that common on such a build. Lack of juice in the system would surely cause over-fueling. It could also be part of why in 1 run he caught you sooner than another.
07-18-2010, 10:17 AM
#34
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive had a couple camaros, now im building a 92 foxbody with a l92 headed 6.0. But Ive known dustin and the guys at mainstreet for years though. Awsome guys do work with.
