another family man fight's back!
another family man fight's back! it sure is good to hear of another turd getting handled buy a victim. http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?se...cal&id=7877690
Trending Topics
left the red mustang with graphics on the doors in the street so they can look up the plates or have someone identify the car.
its because when things like this happen no one sees anything and if they do no one seems to care or want to help. that saying "you got to take matter in your own hand"
its because when things like this happen no one sees anything and if they do no one seems to care or want to help. that saying "you got to take matter in your own hand"
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever
Verdad Gallardo
Glad his family is safe....
"it was his choice to go outside and his choice to take 2 lives"
Damn straight it was his choice. and a good one. it was also the choice of those 2 ILLEGAL guys to go into someone else's house and take what someone worked hard for. if they weren't in this country this would NEVER would of happened. they broke the law as soon as they came here and obviously had no intent to better them self's.
im moving to texas!
Damn straight it was his choice. and a good one. it was also the choice of those 2 ILLEGAL guys to go into someone else's house and take what someone worked hard for. if they weren't in this country this would NEVER would of happened. they broke the law as soon as they came here and obviously had no intent to better them self's.
im moving to texas!
guess your right i did some research ...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O6OU...yer_detailpage
I'm all for Joe Horns Actions, he just made the mistaken of calling 911 first and using the wrong words with the 911 operater....
He has spent all kinds of $$ in legeal fees and now has to come out of retirement to be able to afford to defend himself in the Civil suites....
B
He has spent all kinds of $$ in legeal fees and now has to come out of retirement to be able to afford to defend himself in the Civil suites....B
I'm all for Joe Horns Actions, he just made the mistaken of calling 911 first and using the wrong words with the 911 operater.... He has spent all kinds of $$ in legeal fees and now has to come out of retirement to be able to afford to defend himself in the Civil suites....
B
He has spent all kinds of $$ in legeal fees and now has to come out of retirement to be able to afford to defend himself in the Civil suites....B
yup your right he will. He will end up wasting a ton of money defending himself. Sucks how the legal system works.
Yup it does, but they can still try and sue him and he will have to defend him and waste tons of money in court, like I said above, sucks how the legal system works these days.
In addition to providing a valid defense in criminal law, many versions of the Castle Doctrine, particularly those with a "Stand-Your-Ground clause", also have a clause which provides immunity from any lawsuit filed on behalf of the assailant for damages/injury resulting from the use of lethal force. Without this clause, it is possible for an assailant to sue for medical bills, property damage, disability, and pain and suffering as a result of the injuries inflicted by the defender, or for their next-of-kin to sue for wrongful death in the case of a fatality. Even if successfully refuted, the defendant (the homeowner/defender) must often pay thousands of dollars in legal costs as a result of such lawsuits, and thus without immunity, such civil action could be used for revenge against a defender acting lawfully.
The only exceptions to this civil immunity are generally situations of excessive force, where the defender used deadly force on a subdued, cooperative, or disabled assailant. A situation meeting this exception generally invalidates the criminal "castle defense" as well. In addition, someone who uses deadly force in self-defense is still liable for any damages or injuries to third parties who were not acting criminally at the time of the defensive action
The only exceptions to this civil immunity are generally situations of excessive force, where the defender used deadly force on a subdued, cooperative, or disabled assailant. A situation meeting this exception generally invalidates the criminal "castle defense" as well. In addition, someone who uses deadly force in self-defense is still liable for any damages or injuries to third parties who were not acting criminally at the time of the defensive action
The problem with that video / situation is the fact that it was another persons home/property and not his own. I understand why he did it but there are always differnt points of view and opinions. Whats stupid is they where "illegals". If he didnt want to face any legal trouble he should have fired in one shot in the air and im sure they would have dissapeared if they werent armed, the fact that he fired more than one shot and was still on the phone is what made it a contreversy.
Last edited by 99CamVanillaTop; Jan 5, 2011 at 01:18 PM.