Osama bin laden dead

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2011 | 10:03 PM
  #101  
dr_whigham's Avatar
The Scammer Hammer
15 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,710
Likes: 22
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

I'm glad he's dead, but how much more fun would it have been to assemble rallies like have been held today, take him to the center of ground zero in an armored truck, and just let him out.....
Old 05-02-2011 | 10:23 PM
  #102  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 317
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Jake_the_Snake
are you high? the information used to find him was acquired during the Bush administration. furthermore, it was allegedly acquired using techniques that were labeled "torture" by Obama and subsequently banned. if KSM had been captured during the Obama administration, Osama likely would not have been killed.
Some of the intel used to find bin Laden was obtained during the Bush administration, it wasn't until August that we even had an idea where he was and even then, like I said, it was a "best guess" at that. The guy that claimed the intel was obtained by KSM on Bill O'Reilly's show (R-Rep. Peter King) wasn't even informed of the mission until 30 minutes before Obama went on air to tell the world, yet the former director of the CIA (Ret. GEN Micheal Hayden) went on air today and wouldn't even disclose the detainee's identity, much less where he was held, except to say that it WAS NOT GITMO.

And I highly doubt Obama pushed to ban waterboarding because he didn't care to find Osama. It is torture, plain and simple, and its led to some good intel and a lot of bad intel. When Iraqis surrended to US forces by the hundreds, it wasn't because they were expecting to be tortured I assure you that, so there is justification to banning it. Whether KSM would have squealed with or without being tortured is debatable, and at this point unprovable. Cutting off a person's hand is very effective at thwarting would-be theives, but does that mean its acceptable practice?

Originally Posted by Jake_the_Snake
and that video proves nothing. it is highly impractical to focus on capturing one man while fighting a war. the capture or killing of OBL was but one of many goals of Bush's War on Terror, dubbed "Overseas Contingency Operation" by Obama. the US was not in afghanistan to hunt down OBL. Bush explained in his 2001 war on terror speech that the goal was to take down al qaeda and other terrorist networks abroad and States that support them, including but not restricted to afghanistan under the taliban. at the end of this clip, he says that his goal is to make sure that the troops are well supplied, that the strategy is clear, and the coalition remains strong. these are all appropriate things to say during a war, not "we have to catch that guy no matter what!" remember, he was but a man. without safety, money, supplies, etc, he could no longer pose much of a threat to the US. by removing these things and actively working to destroy terrorists, Bush was able to essentially neutralize him without actually killing him.
Its one thing to focus on one guy when we're fighting a war, but its another to start a war when we should be focusing on one man. Osama bin Laden orchestrated the attack that killed over 3,000 civilians, and changed America forever. After 9-11, our intelligence officials believed Osama was in Afghanistan and that would be where we would find him. What do we do? We send roughly 11,000 troops to Afghanistan, and then more than 10 times that to Iraq! For what? "WMD's"? To fight this "War on Terror"? To liberate Iraqis? Meanwhile, Osama's trail goes cold in Afghanistan, only to be found nearly 10 years later in a $1 million mansion in Pakistan!

Originally Posted by Jake_the_Snake
and by the way, Obama said basically the same thing, "My preference obviously would be to capture or kill him. But if we have so tightened the noose that he's in a cave somewhere and can't even communicate with his operatives, then we will meet our goal of protecting America."

the only real difference is that Obama more or less went with the flow, and is receiving credit for killing OBL, whereas Bush took the steps necessary to achieve the end result, but received much flak for doing it.
Went with the flow? He took a huge risk in giving the GO for that mission. There was absolutely no proof that Osama was even there, hence the reason they opted not to just have a UAV drop some smart bombs on the compound and keep our fighting men safe. That could have easliy ended badly for him if there were just innocent people there. With elections coming, it would have been a political suicide.

In the end, I don't care who gets the credit. KSM can have the credit since he gave up some of the intel. Lockheed can have the credit for providing the aircaft used to collect more intel. Lets give credit to the manufacturers of the SEAL Team's boots, clothing, and ammo while we're at it. All I care about is that the goat ****** is finally dead and I take satisfaction in knowing the last thing that went through his head was likely a 5.56 NATO round.
Old 05-02-2011 | 11:01 PM
  #103  
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
From: NW Houston, TX
Default

IBTL
Old 05-03-2011 | 02:23 AM
  #104  
dr_whigham's Avatar
The Scammer Hammer
15 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,710
Likes: 22
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

LOL

Old 05-03-2011 | 10:42 AM
  #105  
BigBronco's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Old 05-03-2011 | 12:48 PM
  #106  
5w20's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
From: Houston , Tx
Default

WASHINGTON – When one of Osama bin Laden's most trusted aides picked up the phone last year, he unknowingly led U.S. pursuers to the doorstep of his boss, the world's most wanted terrorist.
That monitored phone call, recounted Monday by a U.S. official, ended a years-long search for bin Laden's personal courier, the key break in a worldwide manhunt. The courier, in turn, led U.S. intelligence to a walled compound in northeast Pakistan, where a team of Navy SEALs shot bin Laden to death.
[Related: Timeline: Key dates in the hunt for bin Laden]
The violent final minutes were the culmination of years of intelligence work. Inside the CIA team hunting bin Laden, it always was clear that bin Laden's vulnerability was his couriers. He was too smart to let al-Qaida foot soldiers, or even his senior commanders, know his hideout. But if he wanted to get his messages out, somebody had to carry them, someone bin Laden trusted with his life.
Shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, detainees in the CIA's secret prison network told interrogators about an important courier with the nom de guerre Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti who was close to bin Laden. After the CIA captured al-Qaida's No. 3 leader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he confirmed knowing al-Kuwaiti but denied he had anything to do with al-Qaida.
Then in 2004, top al-Qaida operative Hassan Ghul was captured in Iraq. Ghul told the CIA that al-Kuwaiti was a courier, someone crucial to the terrorist organization. In particular, Ghul said, the courier was close to Faraj al-Libi, who replaced Mohammed as al-Qaida's operational commander. It was a key break in the hunt for in bin Laden's personal courier.
"Hassan Ghul was the linchpin," a U.S. official said.
Finally, in May 2005, al-Libi was captured. Under CIA interrogation, al-Libi admitted that when he was promoted to succeed Mohammed, he received the word through a courier. But he made up a name for the courier and denied knowing al-Kuwaiti, a denial that was so adamant and unbelievable that the CIA took it as confirmation that he and Mohammed were protecting the courier. It only reinforced the idea that al-Kuwaiti was very important to al-Qaida.
If they could find the man known as al-Kuwaiti, they'd find bin Laden.
The revelation that intelligence gleaned from the CIA's so-called black sites helped kill bin Laden was seen as vindication for many intelligence officials who have been repeatedly investigated and criticized for their involvement in a program that involved the harshest interrogation methods in U.S. history.
[Related: Major attacks by al-Qaida]
"We got beat up for it, but those efforts led to this great day," said Marty Martin, a retired CIA officer who for years led the hunt for bin Laden.
Mohammed did not discuss al-Kuwaiti while being subjected to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, former officials said. He acknowledged knowing him many months later under standard interrogation, they said, leaving it once again up for debate as to whether the harsh technique was a valuable tool or an unnecessarily violent tactic.
It took years of work before the CIA identified the courier's real name: Sheikh Abu Ahmed, a Pakistani man born in Kuwait. When they did identify him, he was nowhere to be found. The CIA's sources didn't know where he was hiding. Bin Laden was famously insistent that no phones or computers be used near him, so the eavesdroppers at the National Security Agency kept coming up cold.
Ahmed was identified by detainees as a mid-level operative who helped al-Qaida members and their families find safe havens. But his whereabouts were such a mystery to U.S. intelligence that, according to Guantanamo Bay documents, one detainee said Ahmed was wounded while fleeing U.S. forces during the invasion of Afghanistan and later died in the arms of the detainee.
But in the middle of last year, Ahmed had a telephone conversation with someone being monitored by U.S. intelligence, according to an American official, who like others interviewed for this story spoke only on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive operation. Ahmed was located somewhere away from bin Laden's hideout when he had the discussion, but it was enough to help intelligence officials locate and watch Ahmed.
In August 2010, Ahmed unknowingly led authorities to a compound in the northeast Pakistani town of Abbottabad, where al-Libi had once lived. The walls surrounding the property were as high as 18 feet and topped with barbed wire. Intelligence officials had known about the house for years, but they always suspected that bin Laden would be surrounded by heavily armed security guards. Nobody patrolled the compound in Abbottabad.
In fact, nobody came or went. And no telephone or Internet lines ran from the compound. The CIA soon believed that bin Laden was hiding in plain sight, in a hideout especially built to go unnoticed. But since bin Laden never traveled and nobody could get onto the compound without passing through two security gates, there was no way to be sure.
Despite that uncertainty, intelligence officials realized this could represent the best chance ever to get to bin Laden. They decided not to share the information with anyone, including staunch counterterrorism allies such as Britain, Canada and Australia.
By mid-February, the officials were convinced a "high-value target" was hiding in the compound. President Barack Obama wanted to take action.
"They were confident and their confidence was growing: 'This is different. This intelligence case is different. What we see in this compound is different than anything we've ever seen before,'" John Brennan, the president's top counterterrorism adviser, said Monday. "I was confident that we had the basis to take action."
Options were limited. The compound was in a residential neighborhood in a sovereign country. If Obama ordered an airstrike and bin Laden was not in the compound, it would be a huge diplomatic problem. Even if Obama was right, obliterating the compound might make it nearly impossible to confirm bin Laden's death.
Said Brennan, "The president had to evaluate the strength of that information, and then made what I believe was one of the most gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory."
Brennan told CNN Tuesday that "there was no single piece of information that was an 'ah-hah' moment." He said officials took "bits and pieces" of intelligence gathered and analyzed over a long period of time to nail down the leads they needed.
Obama tapped two dozen members of the Navy's elite SEAL Team Six to carry out a raid with surgical accuracy.
Before dawn Monday morning, a pair of helicopters left Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan. The choppers entered Pakistani airspace using sophisticated technology intended to evade that country's radar systems, a U.S. official said.
Officially, it was a kill-or-capture mission, since the U.S. doesn't kill unarmed people trying to surrender. But it was clear from the beginning that whoever was behind those walls had no intention of surrendering, two U.S. officials said.
The helicopters lowered into the compound, dropping the SEALs behind the walls. No shots were fired, but shortly after the team hit the ground, one of the helicopters came crashing down and rolled onto its side for reasons the government has yet to explain. None of the SEALs was injured, however, and the mission continued uninterrupted.
With the CIA and White House monitoring the situation in real time — presumably by live satellite feed or video carried by the SEALs — the team stormed the compound.
Thanks to sophisticated satellite monitoring, U.S. forces knew they'd likely find bin Laden's family on the second and third floors of one of the buildings on the property, officials said. The SEALs secured the rest of the property first, then proceeded to the room where bin Laden was hiding. A firefight ensued, Brennan said.
Ahmed and his brother were killed, officials said. Then, the SEALs killed bin Laden with a bullet just above his left eye, blowing off part his skull, another official said. Using the call sign for his visual identification, one of the soldiers communicated that "Geronimo" had been killed in action, according to a U.S. official.
Bin Laden's body was immediately identifiable, but the U.S. also conducted DNA testing that identified him with near 100 percent certainty, senior administration officials said. Photo analysis by the CIA, confirmation on site by a woman believed to be bin Laden's wife, who was wounded, and matching physical features such as bin Laden's height all helped confirm the identification. At the White House, there was no doubt.
"I think the accomplishment that very brave personnel from the United States government were able to realize yesterday is a defining moment in the war against al-Qaida, the war on terrorism, by decapitating the head of the snake known as al-Qaida," Brennan said.
U.S. forces searched the compound and flew away with documents, hard drives and DVDs that could provide valuable intelligence about al-Qaida, a U.S. official said. The entire operation took about 40 minutes, officials said.
Bin Laden's body was flown to the USS Carl Vinson in the North Arabian sea, a senior defense official said. There, aboard a U.S. warship, officials conducted a traditional Islamic burial ritual. Bin Laden's body was washed and placed in a white sheet. He was placed in a weighted bag that, after religious remarks by a military officer, was slipped into the sea about 2 a.m. EDT Monday.
Said the president, "I think we can all agree this is a good day for America."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_bin_la..._for_bin_laden
Old 05-03-2011 | 01:27 PM
  #107  
Head Hunter's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: North Dallas
Default

Thanks for posting 5w20 - good read
Old 05-03-2011 | 01:28 PM
  #108  
Jake_the_Snake's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville, TN
Default

^^ thanks for posting that.

to kcs, the Bush administration had obviously been working on finding OBL for years. that courier, whose identity was ascertained during the Bush administration using techniques banned by the Obama administration. I stand by my statement, that if the detainees had been captured during the Obama administration, Osama would still be alive. im not saying obama banned waterboarding because he did not want to catch osama. rather, im saying that the information would not have been extracted, due to the fact that it was banned. this courier was the missing link and it was by chance that he had slipped up when he did. i agree that the fact he's dead is more important than who gets credit for it, but to say Bush had nothing to do with it, or that he did not care about finding him is just wrong.

As for finding the "one man", how would you have done it? its important to realize that though he was the "mastermind" of 9/11, he was not the only terrorist out there. by taking down the taliban and shutting down the various training camps and strongholds, the US has achieved much more than would have happened if all we did was kill one man. osama wasnt the alpha omega terrorist, or even the most dangerous one. he was just the most famous one. this whole war on terror is much bigger than one man, and its important to realize that.

and i'll agree that there was a fair amount of risk involved in this operation. however, i think you are wrong in saying that there was no evidence that he was there. there clearly was. also, i think the risk associated with attacking a compound that had evidence, but not undeniable proof that he was there pales in comparison to the risk of ignoring evidence and not taking the opportunity to find him. i'll give credit where credit's due. im glad he decided to do what he did, but to describe obama's decision to kill osama as "gutsy" is far from accurate, especially when compared to the alternative.
Old 05-03-2011 | 02:04 PM
  #109  
08-4door's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: houston tx
Default

Good.post 5w20
Old 05-03-2011 | 02:34 PM
  #110  
-Ross-'s Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 21
From: Houston/Alvin, TX
Default

Bin Laden - Arabic for fish turds.
Old 05-04-2011 | 07:54 AM
  #111  
TechCam97's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 29
From: Troy, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Slow LSX
What if the wrong man was killed.........
Old 05-04-2011 | 11:08 AM
  #112  
Texas-Firehawk's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas Texas
Default

Originally Posted by -Ross-
Bin Laden - Arabic for fish turds.
Walk in to the bar and order a Bin Laden....

You will get 2 Shots and a Splash of Water.

Then : Toast to his death.
Old 05-04-2011 | 11:09 AM
  #113  
jmurray87's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

His photo after being shot, or so I am told anyways.


No Graphic images allowed.

Last edited by jmurray87; 05-04-2011 at 12:08 PM.
Old 05-04-2011 | 11:20 AM
  #114  
Head Hunter's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: North Dallas
Default

Damn... looks too quick though
Old 05-04-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #115  
03Sssnake's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: H-Town/Cypress
Default

They have not officially released them yet, but that looks pretty real, could be a leaked photo. The CIA Chief says the photos are coming, however; Clinton is digging in her heals and saying no. She is about as worthless as rubber lips on a woodpecker.
Old 05-04-2011 | 02:29 PM
  #116  
Ravenous T\A's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 0
From: Burleson/Ftw,Texas
Default

They stated they are not releasing the photos
Old 05-04-2011 | 02:53 PM
  #117  
Head Hunter's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: North Dallas
Default

I say "good move" - I know I hate hearing or seeing pictures of dead Americans (soldiers or civilians) and I think this would have been a poor move just to silence a few people who would just claim it was photochopped anyway.
Old 05-04-2011 | 03:33 PM
  #118  
-Ross-'s Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 21
From: Houston/Alvin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Head Hunter
I say "good move" - I know I hate hearing or seeing pictures of dead Americans (soldiers or civilians) and I think this would have been a poor move just to silence a few people who would just claim it was photochopped anyway.
I think it's a ******* bitch move.
Old 05-04-2011 | 05:28 PM
  #119  
5w20's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
From: Houston , Tx
Default

Originally Posted by jmurray87
His photo after being shot, or so I am told anyways.


No Graphic images allowed.

weak.

PM the pic!
Old 05-04-2011 | 05:51 PM
  #120  
01FbTaWs6's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Rapids, IA
Default

Im very glad he is dead. Who gets the credit from a presidential standpoint is pointless to argue about. As it really does not matter, at all. The seals did the job. I will say it again, Im very glad he is dead. And i think its time to cut off the cash flow we give pakistan, as obviously there intelligence was bogus.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.