Homo Romo Again!
12-13-2011, 11:20 AM
#41
7 and 6? That billion dollar stadium might as well be turned into a parking lot, waste of space, not to mention the worthless fans, LOL.
12-13-2011, 12:18 PM
#43
Launching!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-13-2011, 12:53 PM
#46
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total
Baltimore doesn't have the offense to hang with the other top teams imo.
12-13-2011, 01:15 PM
#47
Yall also haven't faced a really potent offense either with the exception of the Saints. Not saying the texans D is bad because its not, just that the standings are a bit skewed by strength-of-schedule. The saints are the only top 10 team yall have played.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total
Baltimore doesn't have the offense to hang with the other top teams imo.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total
Baltimore doesn't have the offense to hang with the other top teams imo.
Edit: just realised you were referring to top ten offenses
Last edited by HTX; 12-13-2011 at 01:20 PM.
12-13-2011, 01:17 PM
#48
Yall also haven't faced a really potent offense either with the exception of the Saints. Not saying the texans D is bad because its not, just that the standings are a bit skewed by strength-of-schedule. The saints are the only top 10 team yall have played.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total
Baltimore doesn't have the offense to hang with the other top teams imo.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/total
Baltimore doesn't have the offense to hang with the other top teams imo.
For the record, we have played Pittsburgh, Oakland, Baltimore and Atlanta. All those teams are in the top half in the NFL in offense.
Pittsburgh, Oakland and Atlanta are all about 100-150 yards away from being in the top 10. If they don't face that Houston Defense, they might very well be top 10.
Give us some credit.
12-13-2011, 01:18 PM
#49
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The ones in that link, and when the texans played the saints Brees wasn't warmed up yet, he's gotten much better as the season has progressed. There's not doubt the texans D has improved enough to give them a decent shot, just need TJ to continue to hold up his end of the deal.
12-13-2011, 01:20 PM
#50
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We play #5 Carolina this week. We'll see how that goes.
For the record, we have played Pittsburgh, Oakland, Baltimore and Atlanta. All those teams are in the top half in the NFL in offense.
Pittsburgh, Oakland and Atlanta are all about 100-150 yards away from being in the top 10. If they don't face that Houston Defense, they might very well be top 10.
Give us some credit.
For the record, we have played Pittsburgh, Oakland, Baltimore and Atlanta. All those teams are in the top half in the NFL in offense.
Pittsburgh, Oakland and Atlanta are all about 100-150 yards away from being in the top 10. If they don't face that Houston Defense, they might very well be top 10.
Give us some credit.
12-13-2011, 02:23 PM
#51
that loss had nothing to do with how romo performed
yates: 26 of 44 for 300 yards 2td's 1 int
Romo 'homo': 21 of 31 for 400 yards 4 td's 0 ints
Obviously he had nothing to do with the loss, that loss fell onto the defense not holding a 12 point lead in the 4th, and special teams that cant punt further than 35 yards. Not romo.
yates: 26 of 44 for 300 yards 2td's 1 int
Romo 'homo': 21 of 31 for 400 yards 4 td's 0 ints
Obviously he had nothing to do with the loss, that loss fell onto the defense not holding a 12 point lead in the 4th, and special teams that cant punt further than 35 yards. Not romo.
12-13-2011, 02:37 PM
#53
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because the same people that are ******* the **** out of Romo are about to choke on TJs nutts they're riding him so hard. Romo had a better game and did his part but still lost because our D looked like a bunch of flag football players late in the 4th.
12-13-2011, 02:43 PM
#54
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio Tejas, TX
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If that's you case then it'd be NoRleans vs Texans sounds like a good game. I won't get much unto cowboys vs texans debate but I really don't like the cowboys mainly because jerry Jones is a horses ***. I don't like the way he belittles other players and coaches with his drinking buddies.
12-13-2011, 02:47 PM
#55
Only time will tell with the kid. He was certainly composed in the final drive Sunday.
12-13-2011, 02:52 PM
#56
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've never been a big fan of Romo, he's got great ups, but his downs are just too far down. I don't have a clue who we could legitimately replace him with and not squander atleast one season with them getting into the swing of things. Yates is looking good but he's also got a lot of support around him and a pretty damn good D. If yall lost Foster or Cushing I don't think he could compensate with his skill, but I don't think Schaub would either...
