441ci LSX Twin Turbo new #'s! Precision CEA vs Turbonetics TC70"s
was that on 150shot?
01-09-2012, 05:29 PM
#46
Strong numbers y2k
Hey jeremym, why does the graph stop at about 57-58 with the old turbos rather than like 65-66 with the new ones?
Do you think it would have made a difference if you would have held it out a little higher in the rpms with the old turbos
Hey jeremym, why does the graph stop at about 57-58 with the old turbos rather than like 65-66 with the new ones?
Do you think it would have made a difference if you would have held it out a little higher in the rpms with the old turbos
01-09-2012, 05:46 PM
#47
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not really apples to apples since the WG pressure was increased to bring on the boost faster. i would ASSume that's why the old turbos never made any power early. i mean look at that linear tq line on the old turbos..... boost was coming in sllllllllllllllooooow.
regardless, happy that you're happy.
my money is on the caddy
regardless, happy that you're happy.
my money is on the caddy
01-09-2012, 08:18 PM
#52
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's funny the old turbos peaked 6200 and fell off at 6300 to 6500rpm and the new ones keep climbing . We should of pulled it to 6800-7000 rpm. Why is that?
01-09-2012, 08:34 PM
#53
9 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: HOUSTON-TX
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
something just doesn't seem right with your old turbos, I have bigger ones.. TC76s, with 0.81 A/R with a smaller motor, 427, and they spool more like your new turbos do, and never drop off, climbs all the way to 7500...
01-10-2012, 02:20 PM
#60
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts