Does this seem right?
Current car: 2001 Trans Am - LS6 MAF, ported TB, ASP u/d pulley, Cartek Stage 2X heads (2.02in 1.57ex milled .030), Comp Cams G5X2 clone (232/240 .595/.608 112+4), FLP LT's w/ORY and stock catback, FLT Level 4 trans w/Yank SS4000 and 2.73 gears in the rear. The car dyno'd 382/377 with the cutout open.
My previous car: 1998 Z28 - ported TB, FAST 78 intake, FM13 (230/232 .585/.591 114), Pacesetter LT's, 3" duals dumped at axle, TCI3500 SSF and 3.23 gears in the rear. This car made 384/375.
I'm more interested to see what the T/A will run at the track. The Z28 ran a best of 12.00@113.7
Last edited by Morbid; Jan 31, 2008 at 05:49 PM.
If anyone has a stock MAF and wants an LS6, I'll swap you. I have two LS6 MAF's, so if anyone needs one let me know.
I'm not entirely sure everything needed to swap to an LS6 MAF, may do a search on it.
Trending Topics
Last edited by chrysler kid; Jan 30, 2008 at 05:29 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

I definitely want to get a rear end under this car with some 3.73's or so. Not sure if that's a gear that would compliment the setup or not, I'll have to do some research.
My friend says this car feels a lot stronger than the Z28, but I'm not feeling it. Watching the speedometer climb seems a little slower than the Z28 as well. It may be all in my head though. That's why I want to get it to the track, that will dictate what I do next to it.
i still havent mashed the throttle on the Z yet. i drove it to lubbock and i drive it once a week to walmart down the street so im not gonna get the best track times out of it without the driver mod lol

I definitely want to get a rear end under this car with some 3.73's or so. Not sure if that's a gear that would compliment the setup or not, I'll have to do some research.
My friend says this car feels a lot stronger than the Z28, but I'm not feeling it. Watching the speedometer climb seems a little slower than the Z28 as well. It may be all in my head though. That's why I want to get it to the track, that will dictate what I do next to it.
I personally will say get the 3.73's.. I think those 2.73's are killing you, and making it feel like it is not as fast....
3.73's are the ****... for a4.. IMO.
if its m6, go 4.10's
2.73s do not dyno well I hear
I mean how many people have 2.73s in their race cars? What an odd combo. I also bet that you wouldnt see as big a difference between 2.73s and 3.73s as you think. I don't think 3.73's would feel much different driving around. Looks like it drives like mine.
2.73s do not dyno well I hear
I mean how many people have 2.73s in their race cars? What an odd combo. I also bet that you wouldnt see as big a difference between 2.73s and 3.73s as you think.that was the selling point on my car....
I test drove alot of camaros, and T/A's, but none of them felt like mine.
I was looking for something, and they all just did not feel that good.
Then I found my baby.. LOL...

Put the car in gear and at about 40 MPH, look over at my wife and tell her.
This one is mine...
So we drive for about 2 miles, we went back and bought it.
So I think there is a nice difference in the gears, and noticeable..
This all IMO...
and if you have a stall.. dam. it makes the difference.
but as for driving around, I have no stall, the car feels good.
A4 is what I have.
this is what my MPH tops out at in the gears with the 3.73
MPH.. 1st 38
MPH...2nd 72
MPH...3rd 122
then OD4th for the rest
and this is not going past 6 grand.





