hornets got OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL!!!!!!!!!!
05-09-2008, 10:19 AM
#42
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spurs City!!! SA, Tx
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1 witcha man!! i had a feeling that the spurs would win, but during halfway through the game, i was like ya know the hornets might pull this close on off! i thought the spurs would give NO a bigger a$$ whoopin.. but NO was right with them the whole game till bout 5 minutes left..
btw slow poke, STFU dude
05-09-2008, 10:21 AM
#43
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort Worth / Crowley / Burleson, Texas
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well ****, the SA fans finally (in GAME 3) could say something.
However,
NO did NOT get owned! SA was OWNED in NO by 19 in game 1 and 18 in game 2, NO didn't lOOSe by THAT much, they only lost by 11, that is NOT owage. NO also had the halftime lead by 4
SA Fans get over yourself. yes, 4 rings PREVIOUSLY! So? that's in the PAST, ya'll need to live in the PRESENT and not count on the PAST to extrapolate FUTURE performances.
Manu AND parker can NOT BOTH have 30+ pts for the rest of the series. Ain't gonna happen.
However,
NO did NOT get owned! SA was OWNED in NO by 19 in game 1 and 18 in game 2, NO didn't lOOSe by THAT much, they only lost by 11, that is NOT owage. NO also had the halftime lead by 4
SA Fans get over yourself. yes, 4 rings PREVIOUSLY! So? that's in the PAST, ya'll need to live in the PRESENT and not count on the PAST to extrapolate FUTURE performances.
Manu AND parker can NOT BOTH have 30+ pts for the rest of the series. Ain't gonna happen.
05-09-2008, 10:29 AM
#45
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spurs City!!! SA, Tx
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well ****, the SA fans finally (in GAME 3) could say something.
However,
NO did NOT get owned! SA was OWNED in NO by 19 in game 1 and 18 in game 2, NO didn't lOOSe by THAT much, they only lost by 11, that is NOT owage. NO also had the halftime lead by 4
SA Fans get over yourself. yes, 4 rings PREVIOUSLY! So? that's in the PAST, ya'll need to live in the PRESENT and not count on the PAST to extrapolate FUTURE performances.
Manu AND parker can NOT BOTH have 30+ pts for the rest of the series. Ain't gonna happen.
However,
NO did NOT get owned! SA was OWNED in NO by 19 in game 1 and 18 in game 2, NO didn't lOOSe by THAT much, they only lost by 11, that is NOT owage. NO also had the halftime lead by 4
SA Fans get over yourself. yes, 4 rings PREVIOUSLY! So? that's in the PAST, ya'll need to live in the PRESENT and not count on the PAST to extrapolate FUTURE performances.
Manu AND parker can NOT BOTH have 30+ pts for the rest of the series. Ain't gonna happen.
that's why there is A team. someone else needs to step up and will. who?? we shall see on sunday
spurs don't need a blowout just a W!!!!
05-09-2008, 10:31 AM
#47
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-09-2008, 10:54 AM
#52
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well ****, the SA fans finally (in GAME 3) could say something.
However,
NO did NOT get owned! SA was OWNED in NO by 19 in game 1 and 18 in game 2, NO didn't lOOSe by THAT much, they only lost by 11, that is NOT owage. NO also had the halftime lead by 4
SA Fans get over yourself. yes, 4 rings PREVIOUSLY! So? that's in the PAST, ya'll need to live in the PRESENT and not count on the PAST to extrapolate FUTURE performances.
Manu AND parker can NOT BOTH have 30+ pts for the rest of the series. Ain't gonna happen.
However,
NO did NOT get owned! SA was OWNED in NO by 19 in game 1 and 18 in game 2, NO didn't lOOSe by THAT much, they only lost by 11, that is NOT owage. NO also had the halftime lead by 4
SA Fans get over yourself. yes, 4 rings PREVIOUSLY! So? that's in the PAST, ya'll need to live in the PRESENT and not count on the PAST to extrapolate FUTURE performances.
Manu AND parker can NOT BOTH have 30+ pts for the rest of the series. Ain't gonna happen.
So how much does a team need to win by for a team to be "owned"? is the cut off 19 pts? just curious.
And im not sure what point your trying to make by saying that NO was up by 4 at half?
GAME 1 - SA up by 4 at half.
GAME 2 - SA up by 1 at half.
So what point were you trying to make, have you even watched the games?
And yes, SA has had 4 prev titles. But they've been pretty damn recent. ie. LAST YEAR. Its not like we are celtics fans talking about titles 20+yrs ago.
And manu and parker cant have 30+ pts a game? we dont need it. We need TD or someone else to step up. NO was finally getting their double team exploited. They'd double team on TD and with a couple quick passes we had WIDE OPEN shots.
05-09-2008, 10:55 AM
#53
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-09-2008, 10:55 AM
#54
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And I dont blame them. If you bitch/whine about a call. Maybe the ref will make up for it the next time down.
05-09-2008, 10:57 AM
#55
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess he doesn't remember the last time the lakers played the spurs, Kobe didn't even have to play the 4th quarterAnd atl getting killed at away games, and barely winning at home means absolutely nothing when it comes to SA.
05-09-2008, 11:15 AM
#60
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All that you have posted the last week is how this series is going to end up 4-1. But when it comes down to it. All that you do is talk. I'm not going to bet 80 just to win 20 in a bet that you "supposedly" have all the confidence in the world about. When I bet. I bet even up. We arent las vegas. I've taken underdogs and never thought about betting "actual odds". If thats the case. then I should get some better odds if I decide to bet against boston. But thats not going to happen. If I prove you wrong in 1 post. All that you do is come back with some new BS. You say I have my blinders on and that Im bias. You obviously havent read my posts. I really do think after seeing SA in game 3. That SA can lose in 6 or 7. They havent looked good. If I had my blinders on, I'd be saying that SA is going to win in 6 blah blah blah. But thats not the case. I also didnt make any excuses for NO winning th 1st 2 games. Either you're seeing **** or your thinking of someone else when you make all these BS replies to me.