Tools & Fabrication Hand | Power | Hydraulic | Pneumatic | Welding | Painting

Torque wrench dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2004, 11:38 AM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Cheatin' Chad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pete2k_Z28
Yep, you are correct. Why the hell was I thinking Proto was a Snap On brand??? Mabey somebody else told me that once? I knew they were a division of a big company, guess I mixed it up. Must have had something to do with posting at 12:30 in the morning

I still stand by my other statement though, Proto tools are VERY nice quality although I've never used their TQ wrenches.

Edit: Although looking at Snap On's site (under "other Snap On sites), it lists Blackhawk as a Snap On company. Yet, under Stanley's sites, it lists Blackhawk as a division of Proto..... although that's Blackhawk Collision Repair, and the Stanley Blackhawk is hand tools... wonder if that's just coincidance? The insignias are different but who the hell knows??? Ok now I'm confused.....
Stanley actually manufactures alot of Snap On's tools. My father has set up and manufactured several of the furnaces,washers, and tempers in Stanley's production facilities.
Old 02-16-2004, 08:28 PM
  #22  
Doc
FormerVendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love these cars, (Fbodies, Corvettes), this board, and anybody involved in said persuit. Being spoiled, working in a government calibration laboratory, traceable to the national standards and technology....I can't help but overemphasize the simple but much often overlooked part when selecting a precision tool to do a precise job. UNCERTAINTY-don't get sucked into the classic "CHic Jeans-Brand Name B.S.." If you are about to perform maintenance on a LS1/(5k++) motor- don't and, I repeat don't take any chances- Yes, the Pin Head engineers do put in some very tight wigggle room but, not slop. Don't let a brand name fool you. Get your wrenches cal'd by a reputatable co. once a year.
Old 02-25-2004, 10:08 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Reading this thread caused me to doubt my Craftsman clicker but I notice that Snap-On makes clickers too.
Old 02-26-2004, 03:28 AM
  #24  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Tom@SpeedInc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Proto torque wrenchs are good cause they use shims for calibration. I recently just picked up Snap on's new digital torque wrenchs in 3/8 and 1/2 work flawlessly and you can also tell how far you went past the torque you specified.

I don't think stanley makes many snap on tools, stanley make a ton of craftsman, Matco, and Mac hand tools not snap on though.
Old 12-04-2004, 06:46 AM
  #25  
Teching In
 
mech 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW! it sounds like some people need to do some research on the tools they use or plan to purchase. First off Proto is a product of Stanley. And no they are not the plain stanley tools made in china like they sell at wal-mart. To me Proto is as good as it gets. They are put through more testing b/c they are industrial tools used by NASA, the military, and other industries. I am a mech in the coal and oil industry. If you have ever been to either i build the dryers & shakers and stuff. You will hardly ever go to the tool room of a wash plant and find a Snap-On or Craftsman tool. <- JUNK. Ok stay with me here. There are three key players in the tool industry. Stanley Danahar & Snap-on all about the same in revenue. Blackhawk is a tool by Proto. Mac is owned by Stanley. Kobalt is a Snap-On tool. Craftsman tools was made by Stanley up until 1994 now they are made by Danahar which hires companies from thailand & china to make some of their tools. Craftsmans power tools like cordless drills are made by Ryobi (not sure about spelling) which is why they are such junk. Facom owns S&K (a.k.a Slip & Kill). When it comes down to it if you do your research most of these tools are junk except Proto and williams and maybe snap-on. I'm not saying that a proto tool is not going to fail. Nor am i saying that all Snap-on tools will fail. No tool is perfect. As far as Torque wrenches we have 1 craftsman torque wrench we only use it for1/2" 20 (which is fine thread) bolts which torques at about 135lbs. And the last time i used it it didn't want to click. when it comes to torque 1" bolts to 850 lbs the only tool we trust is a proto torque wrench. We have one machine we have to torque several bolts to 1900 lbs and i don't think a cheap pos is going to last after the first bolt. Now i don't know what you guys are torque n but one hing to keep in mind is lubrication. In some cases if you don't lubricate your bolts with anti-seize your bolt can lock up and yea break your torque wrench. Trust me you don't want this to happen when you are torqueing at 600+ lbs b/c your wrench will break and slip and it hurts. Just remember that if you use anti-seize you have to subtract 20% off your torque. Also using good bolts like L-9's or E8's instead of cheap grade 4's will help also. Well anyways i just happened to come to the page on a search hope i helped someone out. Got any good tool questions look me up.
Old 12-06-2004, 09:59 AM
  #26  
TECH Veteran
 
robertbartsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartsdale, NY
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey Mech1 - in your view does it make any difference where a tool is manufactured - say Asia vs. USA?

******
I have:
1. Craftsmutt clicker
2. Pittsburg clicker
3. Two Harbor Frieght clickers
4. Craftsmutt bar needle with scale (super cheapie)

I was wondering how accurate the Craftsmutt bar type wrench is so I torked a few bolts down and tested various readings from the different wrenches I own. Surprisingly, the bar-type wrench is quite accruate. Hey - the test was not really scientific but I know it is in the ball park...

As far as clicker type wrenches go, it seems the Craftsmutt breaks often - from what I here on the board. It may just be that more of them are sold but who knows for sure...

If I ever buy another wrench, I may try a Kobalt. Snap-on is great but they too high-priced for me.
Old 12-08-2004, 06:57 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
 
jlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This is worth a read: http://www.team.net/www/morgan/tech/whotools.html
Old 12-09-2004, 11:12 AM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Xsta Z 28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 12,091
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I have the Husky 250 ft/lb torque wrench. Nice unit. Has done quite a few crank pullys!
Old 12-18-2004, 09:27 PM
  #29  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
SubVet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rising Sun, MD
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mech 1 is correct on those tool companies.

In addition to what he said, Williams Tools was bought up by Snap-On.

Danaher owns/makes tools for: Armstrong, Matco, Craftsman, AllenTM, KD-Tools, Holo-Krome, NAPA, and SATA.

Stanley owns/makes Husky, Mac, and Proto Tools (a very expensive industrial brand), Proto is unique because it goes through addtional testing and certification because it is used by NASA, the military, and industrial customers (including General Motors).

As Mentioned SK is owned by Facom....which is a French Company.
Old 12-18-2004, 11:02 PM
  #30  
TECH Regular
 
jlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Quoting directly from that page I linked, eh SubVet?

You guys should really take a look. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the information there, but it's quite interesting, and contradicts some of what Mech is saying.

Example:
From: "Peronto, Daniel J."
To: "John T. Blair"
Subject: Hand tools
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:44:50 -0500


I just wanted to add my 2 cents. Well a nickle really, considering that I work for Snap-on and we over charge for everything : )

I was reading on your site about 'who makes what tools' http://www.team.net/www/morgan/tech/whotools.html. One part explians that the various manufactures use 'the exact same forgings' for all the various brands they sell. This is NOT true for Snap-on tools. Our retail brand Kobalt sold through Lowe's stores, shares very little if any traits with our traditional Snap-on line. They are made in the same plants, but most of the manufacturing tooling is different. They are made by the same UNION skilled machinists useing the same tried and true processes. The designs for these tools are completly different. They use different material and are heat treated differently.

I hope this clears things up slightly
Dan Peronto
Tool Designer
Snap-on Tools
Kenosha Mfg Plant
Old 12-19-2004, 02:58 PM
  #31  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
SubVet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rising Sun, MD
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlaw
Quoting directly from that page I linked, eh SubVet?

Example:
Actually, yes & no. I some was quoted from the web site for Danaher and Stanley.

http://www.danaher.com/business/stra...ail.asp?key=12
http://www.stanleyworks.com/bu_handtools.asp

I just when to that link....and I have WP file of that from a forum I had come a cross a thread that had that listed a while back. I think it was either in Altimas.net or Tractorsbynet.
Old 12-19-2004, 03:09 PM
  #32  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
SubVet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rising Sun, MD
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlaw
Quoting directly from that page I linked, eh SubVet?

Example:
Here where I originally ran into the Article.

http://bricklin.org/TechCentral/TCAr...me.htm#GEN-TOC
Old 12-19-2004, 08:43 PM
  #33  
TECH Regular
 
jlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ah. Interesting stuff.
Old 12-21-2004, 05:12 PM
  #34  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
SubVet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rising Sun, MD
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Big tool companies how they market and make big $$$$
is amazing.
Old 12-25-2004, 11:24 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
LS1 Sounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've been a Calibration Technician for almost 8 year now. During that time I've verified the accuracy of and repaired/adjusted hundreds of torque wrenches in both the military and civilian sectors. Here are my comments based on what I've experienced:

Snap-On makes a very durable torque wrench that can be accurate and remain so after it is adjusted correctly. They tend to be reliable over time, but I would not trust the accuracy of the wrench when it is first purchased. Most of the wrenches that we cal'd for the Air Force were spec'd at +/-4% CW and +/-6% CCW, and I would say that only about 50% of them met this spec out of the box. After we adjusted them initially to our CDI standard, they held the adjustment great and performed accurately. Almost all of these were the click-type.

Craftsman wrenches, especially the type with the setting window were absolute junk. Not only did most of them not meet their specs out of the box, but they would not adjust within specs on the high and low end of the scale. They were typically non-linear (low on the low setting, and high on the high setting) which resulted in having to send them back to Sears for replacement.

I don't remember having too many problems with Proto wrenches... nothing that stands out in my mind anyways.

I have only dealt with two Husky wrenches, both were 250# click-types. I bought one and my brother-in-law bought one from Home Depot at the same time. I checked the accuracy of both of them before use, and they were both within 2% CW, I didn't check either of them CCW since we weren't going to use them in that direction. I pulled my wrench out of the shed where it had been sitting for 2 years without being used, and took it in to work to make sure it was still accurate and found that the handle retaining nuts had come loose so the handle was spinning freely instead of adjusting the torque setting. The fix was as simple as jamming a flat-headed screwdriver inside the back of the handle to hold the nut in place, then back the Allen head adjustment screw out against it. This tightened it back up so I could set the torque, so I checked the accuracy and it is still within +/-2%!. I think we paid $40 each for these wrenches, and they're one of the best values I have found yet.

The beam style wrenches are usually very accurate throughout their useable lives, but are not always the easiest to use. No wrench can be expected to be more accurate than its manufacturer's specifications though, even though some of them are.

For storage purposes with all torque wrenches, you should return the wrench to its lowest setting before putting it away. There is a spring inside that can get damaged if you don't.

Never use your torque wrench to loosen a bolt, that's not what it was designed for. Even if the wrench is designed to be used in the CCW direction, it will cause excess wear on the internals. Why not use a cheap breaker bar that has no accuracy requirements instead?

Originally Posted by Cheatin' Chad
I personally will never again use a Husky TQ wrech due to the awful accuracy of the units I have personally handled.
Out of curiosity, how did you verify the accuracy of your Husky torque wrenches? Based on their constuction and the readings that I've taken with mine and my brother-in-law's torque wrench, they should be pretty reliable and accurate.

There are several factors related to the way it is used that can influence the accuracy of a torque wrench. If you aren't holding the handle level while trying to tighten the fastener, I've seen it throw off readings by 10-15%. Also if you hold the wrench by a part other than the center of the handle (like the metal body, or if you are for some reason using a pipe to extend the handle) it can throw off the accuracy greatly. Any kind of extension will reduce the applied torque value due to flex, and also extreme cold and hot temperatures will throw off their accuracy.

Torque wrenches should definitely have their accuracy verified on a regular interval though. Most of our customers use a 12 month interval, people who use them very often might use a 6 month interval, and most of the Air Force departments sent theirs in every 3 months! Verifying accuracy is important for all measuring tools though, torque wrenches, DMMs, oscilloscopes, etc.

Let me know if you have any other questions! I covered everything that came to the top of my mind.



Quick Reply: Torque wrench dilemma



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.