Error 503 with Firefox only

FF is definitely a better browser than IE, you can't blame it for the faults of some crapware ****-stealing or warez plugins you were trying to run

FF is definitely a better browser than IE, you can't blame it for the faults of some crapware ****-stealing or warez plugins you were trying to run

that ff was stutering on either. It was just common interactions. If you've never had an issue with one product and nothing but issues with the other then you form an opinion of it. I've never had an issue with IE.
Thats not to say others havent, I just havent, but FF on my friends computers sucks *****. Maybe their pc's have issues, that I dont know, but the internet is a nightmare when I use it and try and look at vids or open a site with a plug-in.. like the magnaflow site with interactive sounds.. stuff like that, not warez or ****.. LMAO!!! I've got all the **** I need on my pc and it runs fine
There CAN be a little more effort involved in getting various things to play, when certain websites decide to use a microsoft-only codec or something of the sort. Even then, I use FF exclusively, not even in the Windows environment (Ubuntu Linux, mostly), and I can play anything you can. My browser never crashes, it doesn't get spyware, I don't get viruses, etc. Heck, I can TRY to open a typical virus sent to all these windows machines, and it won't DO anything on Linux
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Honestly, I'd be willing to wager some of you guys are surfing sites and/or installing software that do their best to "crack" systems and exploit their weaknesses. You should EXPECT your system to catch something when you're hanging out in the gutter
Many **** sites, warez sites, peer-to-peer software packages, etc. are in the popular list. Honestly, I'd be willing to wager some of you guys are surfing sites and/or installing software that do their best to "crack" systems and exploit their weaknesses. You should EXPECT your system to catch something when you're hanging out in the gutter
Many **** sites, warez sites, peer-to-peer software packages, etc. are in the popular list.
Actually, this is a vanilla install. The only thing I've added was the useragent switcher which I added to see if it was a useragent problem only (because IE worked when FF didn't). This box was blown away about 3 weeks ago. Unless the error was customized, 503 generally means the server took too long to respond. The interesting thing is it's an error page returned by the server. I'm guessing there is a server side script that handles firefox differently or something that isn't rendering well within firefox. It doesn't happen all the time but when it does, it's pretty steady. I'll see if I can collect some information. Hell it might have something to do with your permissions on the board. Maybe create and surf from a normal user account try that for a while?
The two boxes I've noticed it on is my wife's Dell running SP2 and Firefox (unsure of version but I think it's a couple revisions old) and my IBM T42 laptop also running SP2 running Firefox v2.0.0.4. I seen .5 came out so I am going to upgrade to that and see if it makes any difference. Anyway, hope this helps.
The actual description for the 503 is:
Description: Specifies the maximum time the web server waits for the external application to respond to the first request over a new established connection. If the web server does not receive any data from the external application within this timeout limit, it will mark this connection as bad. This helps to identify communication problem with external application as quickly as possible. If some requests take longer time to process, increase this limit to avoid "503" error messages.
FF is still the best browser I've used though. IE7 is a steaming pile of cow dung.
I get a lot of errors on Netscape and IE on my work computer, but that has to do with my craptastic internet connection. I don't recall getting a 503 on either browser through while trying to surf 'tech.
The actual description for the 503 is:
So, the next question is, are you seeing this message after 60 seconds (the timeout value) or immediately?
When it happens to me, it returns very nearly immediately. I am with cyphur in that I haven't seen it on any of my Xix boxes running firefox. But the error page is definately being returned by the server (Lightspeed webserver as it appears in this case). It's not local.
I agree that it is strange that it is only affecting one family of browsers (and ironically, it's not IE this time). It 'feels' like something in the server side scripts is puking on the the request from a firefox client? I can't imagine what but is there any major delineation between browsers when checks are performed? I honestly haven't noted anything special I was doing that is different than any other time. I will say I seem to notice it more when clicking on posts in the classifieds. The forum will render fine but clicking on individual threads is where the error always occurs for me.
Tech is the only vbulletin board I've noticed it on. Is there a ton of custom code running?
argue what you may, this has nothing to do with cache...it doesn't even make sense how the hell it would even be in conjunction with cache. Firefox, IE...hell, Opera or ANY browser can return this message.
The 503 is a server busy message...nothing more, nothing less. Nothing fancy.
I know for a fact when I'm on the site at crunch (usually around 6-10PM EST) it dogs like crazy as everyone else is on which can throw this at any given moment.
I have received 408's - timeouts. That's when the site is slowing to a crawl and things go down the tubes. That's when "Speeddial - Brains" on my cellphone comes in handy.

http://s117.photobucket.com/albums/o...rent=error.jpg



