2004 Pontiac GTO M6 IBM - 513 HP, 483 LB/FT TQ
08-04-2008, 08:55 PM
#50
On The Tree
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lebanon,Ohio
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so, even though the dyno graph says 431"engine" power it is really 431 Rear wheel horse power? If so, on a dynojet in the same conditions it would be @ 40-50 rearwheel horse power higher? Correct?
BTW, looking foward to checking out the car this week,Crissy.
BTW, looking foward to checking out the car this week,Crissy.
08-05-2008, 11:01 AM
#51
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as Dynojets are concerned, they do traditionally read higher numbers. Mustang numbers are supposed to be a more realistic reading of the power the car is putting out, since they can load the whole vehicles weight. However, there are so many variables from Dyno to dyno, atmospheric condition, etc. it's hard to compare the two.
