Thanks Strictly Performance
08-07-2009, 07:52 PM
#41
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
08-07-2009, 08:02 PM
#42
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
"6. Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired"
....Just making a point.
08-08-2009, 04:22 PM
#43
08-08-2009, 04:24 PM
#44
his name was givven to the da and he had to provide a trail of where it was purchased from ,it was weird because he was going through the sheriffs accadamy at the time.
08-08-2009, 06:04 PM
#46
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats what i got in trouble for ,recieving stollen property ,one of the thing i got hit with is a core supplier that goes by the name (david white ) supposedly unknowingly sold me numerous stollen and questionable core blocks ,as there was to many things in my possesion that were iether unexplainable or stollen i was charged and it took a ton of time and money to get it straightend out with the courts.needless to say that is just the start ,now i have to deal with all the customers that think and feal that i did this intentionally. this is what happend and i have to pay for it.i could be just like some of the other shops that closed and just said **** everybody and kept everything,just something to keep in mind when you are so quick to say ,I am ******* these guy's.
Sorry, I'm just trolling these threads, but keep in mind what is public record with regards to LA Superior Court. I am not involved in any of this, but I am now concerned about facts.
According to public records, there were 7 counts filed 11/2008
count #1 was 10801 VC OWN/OPERATE A "CHOP SHOP" and the disposition (final judgement) was GUILTY/CONVICTED. Disposition date was 02/18/2009
Counts #2-#7 496(A) PC RECEIVNG/CONCEAL STOLEN PROPTY disposition was Dismissed or Not Prosecuted as of 03/25/2009
Mind you, this is all public record and ANYONE can go to the LA Superior Court website and pull this up.
It is common to use such records to research things like babysitters and live-in help.
Here's a direct screenshot.
08-08-2009, 06:32 PM
#47
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Court records state that the defendant was found guilty of operating a chop shop and that the charges of receiving stolen property were dismissed.
Sorry, I'm just trolling these threads, but keep in mind what is public record with regards to LA Superior Court. I am not involved in any of this, but I am now concerned about facts.
According to public records, there were 7 counts filed 11/2008
count #1 was 10801 VC OWN/OPERATE A "CHOP SHOP" and the disposition (final judgement) was GUILTY/CONVICTED. Disposition date was 02/18/2009
Counts #2-#7 496(A) PC RECEIVNG/CONCEAL STOLEN PROPTY disposition was Dismissed or Not Prosecuted as of 03/25/2009
Mind you, this is all public record and ANYONE can go to the LA Superior Court website and pull this up.
It is common to use such records to research things like babysitters and live-in help.
Here's a direct screenshot.
Sorry, I'm just trolling these threads, but keep in mind what is public record with regards to LA Superior Court. I am not involved in any of this, but I am now concerned about facts.
According to public records, there were 7 counts filed 11/2008
count #1 was 10801 VC OWN/OPERATE A "CHOP SHOP" and the disposition (final judgement) was GUILTY/CONVICTED. Disposition date was 02/18/2009
Counts #2-#7 496(A) PC RECEIVNG/CONCEAL STOLEN PROPTY disposition was Dismissed or Not Prosecuted as of 03/25/2009
Mind you, this is all public record and ANYONE can go to the LA Superior Court website and pull this up.
It is common to use such records to research things like babysitters and live-in help.
Here's a direct screenshot.
08-08-2009, 07:13 PM
#51
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is from the California Vehicle Code.
10801. Any person who knowingly and intentionally owns or operates
a chop shop is guilty of a public offense and, upon conviction, shall
be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or
four years, or by a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars
($50,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment, or by up to one year
in the county jail, or by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($1,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment.
10801. Any person who knowingly and intentionally owns or operates
a chop shop is guilty of a public offense and, upon conviction, shall
be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or
four years, or by a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars
($50,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment, or by up to one year
in the county jail, or by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($1,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment.
08-08-2009, 08:04 PM
#53
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Court records state that the defendant was found guilty of operating a chop shop and that the charges of receiving stolen property were dismissed.
Sorry, I'm just trolling these threads, but keep in mind what is public record with regards to LA Superior Court. I am not involved in any of this, but I am now concerned about facts.
According to public records, there were 7 counts filed 11/2008
count #1 was 10801 VC OWN/OPERATE A "CHOP SHOP" and the disposition (final judgement) was GUILTY/CONVICTED. Disposition date was 02/18/2009
Counts #2-#7 496(A) PC RECEIVNG/CONCEAL STOLEN PROPTY disposition was Dismissed or Not Prosecuted as of 03/25/2009
Mind you, this is all public record and ANYONE can go to the LA Superior Court website and pull this up.
It is common to use such records to research things like babysitters and live-in help.
Here's a direct screenshot.
Sorry, I'm just trolling these threads, but keep in mind what is public record with regards to LA Superior Court. I am not involved in any of this, but I am now concerned about facts.
According to public records, there were 7 counts filed 11/2008
count #1 was 10801 VC OWN/OPERATE A "CHOP SHOP" and the disposition (final judgement) was GUILTY/CONVICTED. Disposition date was 02/18/2009
Counts #2-#7 496(A) PC RECEIVNG/CONCEAL STOLEN PROPTY disposition was Dismissed or Not Prosecuted as of 03/25/2009
Mind you, this is all public record and ANYONE can go to the LA Superior Court website and pull this up.
It is common to use such records to research things like babysitters and live-in help.
Here's a direct screenshot.
