MAXXLIMIT

iTrader: (16)

I hate turning on ESPN and reporters talking so much **** on the NFC is garbage and weak. So i did a little researching and take a look at this stat I came up with!!!!



In Superbowls played from 2000-2010 The NFC WEST has had the most teams in the super bowl for the NFC since 2000. Here are the stats.



NFC WEST: 4

NFC EAST: 3

NFC SOUTH: 3

NFC NORTH: 1



Rams 2000 (won), Rams 2002 (lost), Seahawks 2006 (lost), Cardinals 2009 (lost)



So why so much **** talking on the divison that has produced the most NFC apperances in the Super Bowl since 2000.



To me it seems as the NFC WEST is the DIVISON OF THE DECADE FOR THE NFC 2000-2010

Dan

iTrader: (1)

That was then, this is now..Those teams all suck *** at this point. One of these teams will make the playoffs with a losing record.

93Z28rare

iTrader: (11)

Well NFC as a whole will produce 11 appearances in the Super Bowl because it is always an AFC team versus an NFC team.

ESPN calling the whole NFC garbage I can't comment on. But the NFC west this season seems like garbage. The top two teams in that division are 5-6. If Dallas or the Vikings were in that division, they would still have hope.

IT_SS

iTrader: (5)

Please note the victors of the 2005/6 and 2008/9 super bowls >=)

slayer performance

iTrader: (4)

give it time.... west is coming back lol RAMS baby...

IT_SS

iTrader: (5)

and further more, the Division of the decade would the AFC East, followed by the North (GO STEELERS)

AFC East (Ne - 3)
AFC North (Pitt - 2, Bal -1)
AFC South ( Ind - 1)

All Victories might I add

Nemesis350

iTrader: (11)

lol no, you can't argue with that too much. Although it's pretty gay to defend a division in my opinion. Why would you support your team's rivals?

IT_SS

iTrader: (5)

I just really hate the NFC