christang15

iTrader: (1)

i think they look awesome...srt models are sexy on the inside

RPD_Vette84

iTrader: (30)

yup AWD.

01SuperSport

iTrader: (7)

I REALLY like the new rear of these cars. They look pretty mean and the Charger Redline SEMA car is beautiful

ConElite

iTrader: (6)

Front is horrible, Back is Nice

Manny Said it best

allblacksrt4

iTrader: (3)

gm did same thing with camaro. ford was the only one not to make a tank.

IT_SS

iTrader: (5)

they look like ***, I'd take the older one in a heart beat

gm02ceta

iTrader: (9)

The 2012 SRT8 version of the Charger is the ****! It's got a lots of improved features and performance upgrades than the previous one.

The downside is it's probably still a heavy weight and will sticker in $45K+ range.

s/c'd cav

iTrader: (10)

if you have ever paid attention to any chrysler product , weight doesnt seam to hurt them like it does the others

some of their best muscle cars weighed over 2 tons

mannyman84

iTrader: (2)

Be real now. Of course they are hurting in weight. I would spank srt's left and right because of their weight issue

gm02ceta

iTrader: (9)

Coming from someone who owned a 07 SRT Charger I can validate your statement!

Stock off the line they're not as quick but with a good tune from a 30 to 60 mph roll they become beasty in there torque range. I've personally seen the high side of 150 mph in mine a few times and it reached that speed quickly.

Not too many Detroit production sedans in its price range can do that without dropping in some proven bolt-ons.

s/c'd cav

iTrader: (10)

their weight cant make up for the LSballs

lmao


the newer stuff has way to much tq management built in to them

mannyman84

iTrader: (2)

Ok! Ok! I agree on this one haha

I still like the car, it's not bad looking.

20TA02

iTrader: (5)

Its a damn nice car... me pesonally, ill take that over a 5th gen camaro.

0235SS

iTrader: (23)

i thought Dodge own part Mitsubishi ?