the new evo is out
02-16-2008, 05:16 PM
#22
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Evo X's are actually slower than the 9's. They are heavier cars all together.
Car and Driver did a road course and Drag comparo and the 9 beat the X in every race. In the drag race it was slower by .3 secs
Car and Driver did a road course and Drag comparo and the 9 beat the X in every race. In the drag race it was slower by .3 secs
02-16-2008, 08:59 PM
#31
C&Ds chart:
http://caranddriver.com/content/down...Powertrain.pdf
02-16-2008, 09:39 PM
#32
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Almost... the 0-100 in 12.5 was with the 13.4 1/4 (which was at 103).
C&Ds chart:
http://caranddriver.com/content/down...Powertrain.pdf
C&Ds chart:
http://caranddriver.com/content/down...Powertrain.pdf
02-16-2008, 09:53 PM
#33
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVO 8 RS's and MR's are high 12 second cars, not bad from a dig but I refuse to even race them from a roll, there slowwww.....stock...but modded is a different story of course.
02-17-2008, 08:15 AM
#35
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kingdom of Bahrain
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the new EVO sucks if you ask me, I used to like the evo for what it is, a light curve hugging 4 pot, they had to ruin it.
and yeah, when moded they are a defrent animal, some of the local boys here are doing some nice stuff with them lil buggers.
and yeah, when moded they are a defrent animal, some of the local boys here are doing some nice stuff with them lil buggers.